首页|期刊导航|教育与教学研究|中国特殊教育质性研究方法应用的图景呈现与特征描述

中国特殊教育质性研究方法应用的图景呈现与特征描述OACHSSCD

The Landscape and Characteristics of the Application of Qualitative Research Methods in Special Education in China

中文摘要英文摘要

在建构中国特殊教育自主知识体系的时代命题下,对《中国特殊教育》1994-2024年发表的质性研究论文进行综述,反映质性研究范式在我国特殊教育研究中的图景呈现与特征,揭示我国特殊教育知识生产的内在逻辑.中国特殊教育质性研究的萌芽期表现为"前科学"的定性研究,过渡期表现为从定性研究向质性研究迈入,成长期表现为质性研究逐步规范化应用,成熟期表现为本土理论反思与应用研究成果并重,强化期表现为规划纲要实施以来的丰硕成果,新时期表现为新教育政策引领特殊教育学科知识生产.其应用特征表现为:在总体表现上,研究设计、抽样方式、数据获取、数据分析、研究信效度与研究伦理等方面存在不同程度的规范性问题;具体方法方面,个案研究、话语分析、行动研究分别约占58.57%、23.81%、13.33%;主题分布方面,特殊教育课程改革与学校实践、融合教育政策与本土化、特殊教育教师队伍建设成为当前的核心知识.我国特殊教育质性研究论文质量有待提升,但其本土化演进逻辑与扎根实践的改革经验共同昭示,该范式在本土教育生态中蕴藏着极强的理论解释力与实践生命力.基于大数据的质性研究方法的行动路径和后思潮催化的后质性研究也终将为传统质性研究的完善提供愈加丰富的养料.

Under the contemporary proposition of constructing China's autonomous knowledge system in special edu-cation,this paper reviews qualitative research papers published in Chinese Journal of Special Education from 1994 to 2024,reflecting the landscape and characteristics of the qualitative research paradigm in China's special education stud-ies,and revealing the internal logic of knowledge production in China's special education.The development of qualitative research in Chinese special education can be divided into several stages:the embryonic stage,characterized by "pre-scien-tific" qualitative inquiry;the transitional stage,marked by a shift from traditional qualitative approaches to modern qualita-tive research;the growth stage,featuring the gradual standardization of qualitative methods;the maturation stage,where lo-cal theoretical reflection and applied research findings are equally emphasized;the intensification stage,showcasing prolif-ic outcomes following the implementation of national planning outlines;and the new era,driven by recent education poli-cies guiding knowledge production in special education.In terms of its application characteristics,the overall performance reveals varying degrees of normative issues in research design,sampling methods,data collection,data analysis,research validity and reliability,and ethical considerations.Regarding specific methods,case studies,discourse analysis,and action research account for 58.57%,23.80%,and 13.33%of the studies,respectively.Thematic distribution indicates that curriculum reform and school practices in special education,inclusive education policies and localization,and the develop-ment of special education teacher teams have emerged as core knowledge areas.While the quality of qualitative research papers in China's special education requires improvement,their localized evolutionary logic and practical reform experi-ences collectively indicate that this paradigm harbors strong theoretical explanatory power and practical vitality within the local educational ecosystem.The action paths of qualitative research methods based on big data and the post-qualitative research catalyzed by post-thought trends will ultimately provide increasingly rich nourishment for the improvement of tra-ditional qualitative research.

刘永维

西北师范大学教育科学学院 甘肃 兰州 730070

社会科学

《中国特殊教育》质性研究方法论反思文献综述

Chinese Journal of Special Educationqualitative researchmethodological reflectionliterature review

《教育与教学研究》 2026 (8)

99-128,30

河北省社会科学发展研究课题"高质量发展视域下特殊儿童社会情感能力发展特征及培养路径研究"(编号:202403182)西北师范大学研究生科研资助项目"跨学科融合教学背景下中小学教师合作机制的探索"(编号:2024CXZX-LXB005).

评论