首页|期刊导航|食品科学技术学报|不同气味物质对辣感刺激的感官调节作用

不同气味物质对辣感刺激的感官调节作用OA

Sensory Modulatory Effects of Different Odorants on Chemesthesis

中文摘要英文摘要

为探究不同类型气味物质对辣感刺激的感官调节作用及其偏好性关系,以烟碱作为引起小鼠辣感刺激的代表性物质,通过对小鼠呼吸系统指标的检测,评估了15 种典型食品气味物质对辣感刺激暴露后小鼠呼吸系统的调节作用;然后,通过双侧气味偏好性测试,测定小鼠对15 种不同气味物质的嗅觉偏好性;最后构建气味物质多维评价坐标系,阐述不同气味物质的小鼠嗅觉偏好性、生理刺激性及其对代表性刺激物质诱导下的呼吸抑制效应的缓解能力.采用全身体积描记法,建立了不同质量浓度烟碱气溶胶暴露模型,发现随着烟碱质量浓度的升高,小鼠呼吸频率显著变化,并呈现剂量依赖性特征.随后,在确定20 mg/mL烟碱作为代表性的强刺激剂量基础上,将其分别与15 种典型食品气味物质联合暴露,评估不同气味物质对辣感刺激性物质诱导呼吸抑制的调节能力.结果显示,多数气味物质可不同程度缓解烟碱引起的呼吸频率下降,其中乙基麦芽酚、薄荷醇、香芹酚和百里香酚等使呼吸频率由281.45 次/min 显著恢复并最高升至约460 次/min,最高缓解幅度超过60%,部分气味的调节百分比超过170%,提示其不仅能抵消呼吸抑制效应,甚至可诱发一定程度的呼吸兴奋反应;相反,个别气味物质(如呋喃酮),则进一步加重呼吸抑制,显示气味调节具有方向性差异和化学特异性.在此基础上,通过双侧气味偏好性测试,筛选出小鼠对不同气味物质的先天嗅觉偏好等级.结合全身体积描记法测定气味物质本身的支气管狭窄指数以评价气味本身刺激性,并进一步计算气味物质与烟碱联合暴露下呼吸频率的缓解百分比.结果发现,多数偏好性较高的气味物质可有效缓解烟碱诱导的呼吸抑制;部分气味物质虽偏好性较低,但依然表现出较强缓解作用,提示气味的调节效应可能涉及情绪路径外的其他感官通路.最终,基于偏好性、调节作用及刺激性3 项指标构建了气味物质的多维评价坐标系,实现了对气味调节能力的系统分类并构建了一套分析方法.希望研究可在动物模型层面揭示食品来源气味物质对辣感刺激的差异化调节特征,为气味物质在食品多感官体验设计及舒适度优化中的应用提供理论依据.

To investigate the sensory modulatory effects of different types of odorants on chemesthesis and their relationship with odor preference,first,nicotine was used as a representative substance to induce pungent stimulation in mice,and by detecting respiratory system indices in mice,the modulatory effects of 15 typical food-derived odorants on the mouse respiratory system after pungent-stimulation exposure were evaluated.Then,a bilateral olfactory preference test was performed to determine the olfactory preference of mice for 15 different odorants.Finally,a multidimensional evaluation coordinate system of odorants was constructed to elaborate the olfactory preference,physiological irritancy,and the ability to alleviate respiratory suppression induced by the representative irritant substance of different odorants in mice.Whole-body plethysmography was used to establish an exposure model of nicotine aerosol at different mass concentrations,and it was found that with increasing nicotine mass concentration,the respiratory frequency of mice changed significantly and exhibited a dose-dependent characteristic.Subsequently,on the basis of determining 20 mg/mL nicotine as a representative strongly irritant dose,it was co-exposed with 15 typical food-derived odorants,respectively,to evaluate the modulatory capacity of different odorants on respiratory suppression induced by pungent irritant substances.The results showed that most odorants alleviated the nicotine-induced decrease in respiratory frequency to varying degrees.For example,ethyl maltol,menthol,carvacrol and thymol significantly increased respiratory frequency from 281.45 breaths/min under nicotine alone to approximately 460 breaths/min under combined exposure,corresponding to a relief rate of more than 60%,and the modulation percentage exceeded 170%for some odorants,indicating that they not only counteracted the suppressive effect but even induced a certain degree of respiratory excitation.In contrast,individual odorants such as furaneol further aggravated respiratory suppression,demonstrating directional differences and chemical specificity in odor-dependent modulation.On this basis,a bilateral olfactory preference test was used to determine the innate olfactory preference levels of mice for different odorants.Combined with whole-body plethysmography measurements of the bronchoconstriction index(Penh)under odorant-only exposure to evaluate the intrinsic irritancy of each odorant,the percentage relief of respiratory frequency under combined exposure of odorants with nicotine was further calculated.The results showed that most highly preferred odorants effectively alleviated nicotine-induced respiratory suppression,whereas some odorants with relatively low preference still exhibited strong alleviating effects,suggesting that odor-mediated modulation might involve sensory pathways beyond emotional valence.A multidimensional evaluation coordinate system for odorants was constructed based on three indices—preference,modulatory effect,and irritancy—to achieve a systematic classification of odorant modulatory capacity and to establish an analytical framework.It was expected that this study could reveal,at the level of animal model,the differential modulatory characteristics of food-derived odorants on pungent stimulation,and provide a theoretical basis for the application of odorants in the design of multisensory food experiences and the optimization of comfort.

王涵玉;毛健;谢剑平;刘富强;郭露露;裴文豪;范武;柴国璧;崔琨;邓其馨;张启东

北京工商大学 食品与健康学院,北京 100048||北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209||中国农业大学 营养与健康系,北京 100193北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209||中国农业大学 营养与健康系,北京 100193北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209||中国农业大学 营养与健康系,北京 100193中国烟草总公司 郑州烟草研究院,河南 郑州 450001中国烟草总公司 郑州烟草研究院,河南 郑州 450001北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209北京生命科技研究院 风味科学实验室,北京 102209中国烟草总公司 郑州烟草研究院,河南 郑州 450001

轻工纺织

气味辣感感官调节嗅觉偏好评价模型

odorchemesthesissensory modulationolfactory preferenceevaluation model

《食品科学技术学报》 2026 (2)

42-53,12

国家自然科学基金资助项目(32272455、32500864)北京生命科技研究院科技项目(2024300CC0160、2023000CB0010、2024301QPIA01). National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC)(32272455,32500864)Scientific Project of Beijing Life Science Academy(2024300CC0160,2023000CB0010,2024301QPIA01).

10.12301/spxb202500524

评论