首页|期刊导航|肉类研究|高效液相色谱指纹图谱结合化学模式识别在肉类掺伪鉴别中的应用

高效液相色谱指纹图谱结合化学模式识别在肉类掺伪鉴别中的应用OA

High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Fingerprinting Combined with Chemical Pattern Recognition for Meat Adulteration Identification

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:基于高效液相色谱(high performance liquid chromatography,HPLC)技术构建肉类的呈味核苷酸指纹图谱,并结合化学模式识别对羊肉中猪肉掺伪、牛肉中鸭肉掺伪进行鉴别.方法:采用HPLC法分别建立羊肉和猪肉体系、牛肉和鸭肉体系的呈味核苷酸指纹图谱,标定共有峰,并进行相似度评价;对共有峰数据进行化学模式识别分析,包括聚类分析(hierarchical clustering analysis,HCA)和主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA);建立掺伪模型,通过拟合相似度和掺伪量之间的关系获得拟合方程.结果:羊肉和猪肉、牛肉和鸭肉建立的呈味核苷酸指纹图谱均标定了19 个共有峰,包括5'-鸟苷酸、5'-肌苷酸、次黄嘌呤、5'-腺苷酸和肌苷;相似度评价、HCA和PCA结果显示,羊肉和猪肉、牛肉和鸭肉的呈味核苷酸成分差异均较大;掺伪模型结果显示,相似度与掺伪量之间呈负相关,相关系数≥0.99;实际未知市售样品检测结果显示,本研究与实时荧光聚合酶链式反应法检测结果相比,掺伪肉源定性结果一致.结论:通过建立呈味核苷酸指纹图谱,进行相似度分析及化学模式识别分析,并结合相似度与掺伪量之间的拟合方程,可对肉类掺伪进行鉴别和量化.

Objective:Based on high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC),fingerprinting of flavor nucleotides in meat was combined with chemical pattern recognition to identify the adulteration of pork in mutton and the adulteration of duck in beef.Methods:HPLC fingerprints of flavor nucleotides in mutton-pork systems and beef-duck systems were established respectively.Common peaks were identified and similarity evaluation was carried out.The data of the common peaks were analyzed by two pattern recognition algorithms,hierarchical clustering analysis(HCA)and principal component analysis(PCA).A regression equation describing the relationship between similarity and the amount of adulteration was fitted.Results:A total of 19 common peaks between the flavor nucleotide fingerprints of mutton and pork were found including 5'-guanosine monophosphate,5'-inosine monophosphate,hypoxanthine,5'-adenosine monophosphate,and inosine,and the same result was observed between the flavor nucleotide fingerprints of beef and duck.The results of similarity evaluation,HCA and PCA showed that there were significant differences in the flavor nucleotide components between mutton and pork,and between beef and duck.The developed model showed the negative correlation between similarity and adulteration amount with a correlation coefficient≥0.99.This study and real-time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction gave consistent qualitative results for commercial unknown samples.Conclusion:By fingerprinting of flavor nucleotides,similarity analysis and chemical pattern recognition analysis,and regression equation fitting between similarity and adulteration amount,meat adulteration could be identified and quantified.

张雅莉;陈修红;刘佳;李一;谢云峰;王凤香;杨丹;常冬

国贸食品科学研究院有限公司,国家副食品质量检验检测中心,北京 102209中粮营养健康研究院有限公司,营养健康与食品安全北京市重点实验室,北京 102209国贸食品科学研究院有限公司,国家副食品质量检验检测中心,北京 102209中粮营养健康研究院有限公司,营养健康与食品安全北京市重点实验室,北京 102209国贸食品科学研究院有限公司,国家副食品质量检验检测中心,北京 102209中粮营养健康研究院有限公司,营养健康与食品安全北京市重点实验室,北京 102209国贸食品科学研究院有限公司,国家副食品质量检验检测中心,北京 102209中粮营养健康研究院有限公司,营养健康与食品安全北京市重点实验室,北京 102209

轻工纺织

肉类掺伪鉴别高效液相色谱核苷酸指纹图谱

meatadulteration identificationhigh performance liquid chromatographynucleotidesfingerprint

《肉类研究》 2026 (4)

69-75,7

10.7506/rlyj1001-8123-20250429-129

评论