推进皮瓣与旋转皮瓣个性化修复面颊部中等面积创面临床总结OA
Clinical Summary of Individualized Advancement Flap and Rotation Flap for Medium-Sized Cheek Defects Reconstruction
目的:总结推进皮瓣与旋转皮瓣修复术在修复面颊部中等面积缺损中的临床疗效.方法:选取2020年1月-2025年8月笔者医院收治的60例皮肤肿物切除术后面颊部中等面积缺损患者,根据术中缺损形态与局部条件进行个体化术式选择:对形状规则、周围皮肤松弛的32例患者行推进皮瓣修复(推进皮瓣组),对形状不规则或需较大旋转覆盖的28例患者行旋转皮瓣修复(旋转皮瓣组).总结分析两组手术相关指标、皮瓣成活率、一期愈合率、并发症、远期皮瓣相关畸形、患者满意度、客观瘢痕评分及肿瘤学结局.结果:与旋转皮瓣组相比,推进皮瓣组手术时间与术中出血量数值较低(P<0.05).两组拆线时间、术后皮瓣成活率、一期愈合率、术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).皮瓣相关畸形(猫耳畸形、皮瓣臃肿)仅见于旋转皮瓣组,发生率为7.14%(2/28).推进皮瓣组患者主观满意度视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scales,VAS)评分相对较高,温哥华瘢痕量表(Vancouver Scar Scale,VSS)评分相对较低(P<0.05).两组手术切缘病理检查均为阴性,随访期间无1例复发或转移.结论:对于面颊部中等面积缺损,推进皮瓣与旋转皮瓣修复术在皮瓣成活、一期愈合及肿瘤安全性方面均效果确切.推进皮瓣在修复规则缺损时表现出较高的效率与满意度;而旋转皮瓣是复杂缺损的可靠解决方案,但需对其固有的猫耳畸形风险有所预判与管理.临床中应根据缺损形态与局部条件进行个体化术式选择,以优化修复效果.
Objective To summarize the clinical efficacy of advancement flap and rotation flap in the repair of medium-sized defects in the cheek region,providing reference for individualized clinical decision-making.Methods 60 patients with medium-sized cheek defects following skin tumor resection from January 2020 to August 2025 were included and individually assigned to surgical procedures based on intraoperative defect morphology and local tissue conditions.32 patients with regular-shaped defects and suffcient surrounding skin laxity underwent repair with an advancement flap(advancement flap group),while 28 patients with irregularly shaped defects or those requiring greater rotational coverage were treated with a rotation flap(rotation flap group).Operative parameters,flap survival rate,primary healing rate,complications,long-term flap-related deformities,patient satisfaction,objective scar assessment,and oncological outcomes were summarized and analyzed to support individualized clinical application.Results Compared with the rotation flap group,the operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the advancement flap group were relatively low(P<0.05).The two groups showed comparable outcomes in time to suture removal,postoperative flap survival rate,primary healing rate,and incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05).Flap-related deformities(dog-ear deformity and flap bulkiness)were observed only in the rotation flap group,with an incidence of 7.14%(2/28).The advancement flap group showed relatively higher patient satisfaction scores on the visual analogue scale(VAS)and relatively lower scores on the vancouver scar scale(VSS)(P<0.05).Surgical margins were negative for all patients,and no recurrence or metastasis was observed during the follow-up period.Conclusion For medium-sized cheek defects,both advancement flap and rotation flap provide reliable outcomes in terms of flap survival,primary healing,and oncological safety.The advancement flap demonstrates high effciency and favorable aesthetic results for repairing regular defects,while the rotation flap serves as a reliable solution for complex defects,though its inherent risk of dog-ear deformity requires anticipation and management.Individualized surgical selection based on defect morphology and local tissue conditions is recommended to optimize reconstructive outcomes.
章若画;刘岩;申朝霞;郭嵩;张健烽;吉津
江苏省中医院(南京中医药大学附属医院)皮肤科 江苏 南京 210000江苏省中医院(南京中医药大学附属医院)皮肤科 江苏 南京 210000江苏省中医院连云港医院皮肤科 江苏 连云港 222006江苏省中医院(南京中医药大学附属医院)普外科 江苏 南京 210000江苏省中医院(南京中医药大学附属医院)皮肤科 江苏 南京 210000江苏省中医院(南京中医药大学附属医院)皮肤科 江苏 南京 210000
医药卫生
面颊部皮肤缺损推进皮瓣旋转皮瓣皮瓣修复术创面修复
cheekskin defectadvancement flaprotation flapflap reconstructionwound healing
《中国美容医学》 2026 (10)
34-38,5
江苏省科技项目(编号:BE2022819)
评论