基于抖音平台前列腺癌健康科普类短视频信息质量评价OA
Evaluation of the Information Quality of Prostate Cancer Educational Videos on the Tiktok Platform
目的 评价抖音平台内的前列腺癌相关科普视频的信息质量.方法 2025年6月,使用"前列腺癌"关键词,通过抖音平台的默认"综合检索"筛选并提取视频基本信息,最终纳入171条视频.采用内容完整性评估工具和DISCERN视频质量评估工具对视频进行综合质量评估,并分析视频特征与视频质量之间的相关性.结果 171个有效视频共获得122 086次点赞、19 417条评论、32 266次收藏和142 590次转发.视频发布者中,87.72%为实名认证医生,5.85%为个人科普传播者,6.43%为医院官方媒体.内容完整性评分结果显示76.60%的视频在"危险因素"和67.20%的视频在"症状"维度得分为0.DISCERN评分显示得分在16~26分和27~38分的视频分别占38.01%和45.03%.结论 在抖音平台上前列腺癌的科普视频普遍质量不高,因此不推荐将其作为获取前列腺癌科普教育信息的主要来源.
Objective To evaluate the information quality of prostate cancer-related educational videos published on the Ticktock platform.Methods In June 2025,the keyword"prostate cancer"was used to filter and extract basic video information through Ticktock's default"Comprehensive Search"function,resulting in the inclusion of 171 videos.The videos were evaluated using a content completeness assessment tool and the DISCERN video quality assessment tool.The relationship between video characteristics and video quality was analyzed.Results A total of 122 086 likes,19 417 comments,32 266 collections and 142 590 retweets were obtained from 171 valid videos.Among the video publishers,87.72%were real-name certified doctors,5.85%were personal science communicators,and 6.43%were hospital official media.The content integrity score showed that 76.60%of the videos scored 0 in the"risk factors"and 67.20%of the videos scored 0 in the"symptoms"dimension.DISCERN score showed that 38.01%and 45.03%of the videos scored 16-26 and 27-38,respectively.Conclusion The quality of prostate cancer educational videos on the Ticktock platform is generally low.Therefore,these videos are not recommended as a primary source for prostate cancer educational information.
张怀侠;张铭;张小林
扬州大学附属苏北人民医院泌尿外科,江苏扬州 225000扬州大学附属苏北人民医院泌尿外科,江苏扬州 225000扬州大学附属苏北人民医院泌尿外科,江苏扬州 225000
社会科学
抖音前列腺癌科普视频视频质量健康教育
TiktokProstate cancerEducational videoVideo qualityHealth education
《医学信息》 2026 (18)
48-54,7
苏北人民医院院级课题(编号:YGL202422)
评论