著作权视野下学术访谈文章的作者署名规范:双重主体与贡献优先OACHSSCD
Authorship Norms for Academic Interview Articles from Perspective of Copyright:Dual Subjects and Contribution Priority
学术访谈作为承载学术思想碰撞的特殊文体,其作者署名存在形式杂乱、顺序随意等乱象,既模糊了著作权归属边界,也影响了学术贡献的公正认定.依据《中华人民共和国著作权法》相关规定,学术访谈属于访谈者与被访谈者共同创作的合作作品,被访谈者的口述内容构成作品核心学术价值,访谈者的创造性劳动同样不可或缺,双方均享有合法署名权.署名应遵循"贡献优先"原则与著作权法立法精神,采用"被访谈人+访谈人"的双重署名模式,且被访谈人应位列署名首位,这是尊重创作本质、平衡双方权益的必然选择.规范学术访谈署名,需要依托法律指引、期刊规范与学界共识协同推进,以终结署名乱象,保障著作权权益,推动学术访谈回归学术本质、实现健康发展.
As a special genre carrying the collision of academic ideas,academic interviews are plagued by chaotic authorship phenomena such as disorganized forms and arbitrary ordering.This not only obscures the boundary of copyright ownership but also affects the fair recognition of academic contributions.According to the relevant provisions of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China,academic interviews are collaborative works co-created by interviewers and interviewees.The interviewees'oral content constitutes the core academic value of the works,while the interviewers'creative labor is equally indispensable,and both parties enjoy legitimate authorship rights.Authorship should follow the principle of"contribution priority"and the legislative spirit of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China,adopting a dual-authorship model of"interviewee+interviewer"with the interviewee listed first.This is an inevitable choice to respect the essence of creation and balance the rights and interests of both parties.Standardizing the authorship of academic interviews requires the joint advancement of legal guidance,journal norms,and academic consensus,so as to put an end to chaotic authorship,protect copyright rights and interests,and promote the return of academic interviews to their academic essence for healthy development.
刘炎
西北政法大学 国家安全学院,陕西 西安 710063
社会科学
学术访谈署名规范著作权双重主体贡献优先
academic interviewsauthorship normscopyrightdual subjectscontribution priority
《湖北文理学院学报》 2026 (9)
28-33,6
国家社科基金一般项目(22BFX051)
评论