首页|期刊导航|上海国土资源|海域空间利用经济效率衡量及其规划治理研究动态

海域空间利用经济效率衡量及其规划治理研究动态OACHSSCD

Research trends on economic efficiency measurement and planning governance of marine spatial utilization

中文摘要英文摘要

海域是国土的重要组成部分,建设用海的规模快速增长与利用低效矛盾日益凸显,项目用海立体重叠问题显现,海域使用效率的权衡亟待廓清.采用文献计量软件分析国内外海域使用主题下养殖、航运、旅游、石油等矿产开采、风电的研究文献,判识国内外海域空间利用经济效率研究动向.研究发现:(1)海域空间利用经济效率成为海域管控关键指标,多选用数据包络分析和随机前沿分析测算经济效率,分析范式局限于投入-产出、改进期望与非期望产出或综合评价等路径;鲜见从海域利用结构、海域管控要素视角分析海洋空间利用效率的内生因素.(2)海洋空间利用治理以海洋空间规划为主体工具,重点关注海域功能分区与海洋"双评价"内生关系,细化海域利用(弹性)准入清单与标准,亦鼓励各地优化区域用海规划以提升海域利用效率.(3)海洋空间规划方案编制过程的海洋功能分区、海域分层兼容利用、空间弹性准入、集约用海管控等环节所需的衡量指标均指向海域使用效率.未来应重点探索不同功能情景设置约束性、期望产出的效率规则,提出更具操作性且考虑立体分层的海域管控逻辑链及指标簇.

Marine space is an important component of national territory.The rapid expansion of construction-related sea use and its increasingly prominent contradiction with low utilization efficiency have become evident,while issues of three-dimensional overlapping of sea use projects have emerged,urgently requiring clarification of the trade-offs in sea use efficiency.Using bibliometric software,this study analyzes domestic and international research literature on aquaculture,shipping,tourism,mineral extraction,and offshore wind power under the theme of sea use,identifying research trends in the economic efficiency of marine spatial utilization.The findings reveal that:(1)Economic efficiency of marine spatial utilization has become a key indicator for sea management and control.Stochastic Frontier Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis are commonly methods for measuring economic efficiency.However,analytical paradigms remain limited to logic paths based on input-output models,improving desirable outputs or establishing comprehensive evaluation indices.Rarely have studies examined endogenous factors of marine economic efficiency from the perspectives of marine spatial utilization structure and sea control elements.(2)Marine spatial planning primarily focuses on the endogenous relationship between sea functional zoning and marine"dual evaluation(carrying capacity evaluation of resources and environment and suitability evaluation of territorial space development)",refining access lists and standards for(elastic)sea use while encouraging regional optimization of sea use planning to enhance use efficiency.(3)The marine functional zoning,three-dimensional compatible utilization of sea areas,spatial elastic access,and intensive sea use control required in the marine spatial planning formulation process all point to sea area use efficiency as a measurement indicator.Future research should prioritize exploring efficiency rules with binding and expected characteristics under different functional zone scenarios,and propose more operational control logic chains and indicator clusters for sea area management that consider three-dimensional stratification.

梁贤军;马静武;朱少杰;程誉娴;马仁锋

宁波大学东海研究院、地理科学与遥感技术学院,浙江 宁波 315211自然资源部海洋空间资源管理技术重点实验室(浙江省海洋科学研究院),浙江 杭州 310012||温州市国土整治中心,浙江 温州 325027宁波创源土地规划设计有限公司,浙江 宁波 315211宁波大学东海研究院、地理科学与遥感技术学院,浙江 宁波 315211宁波大学东海研究院、地理科学与遥感技术学院,浙江 宁波 315211

海洋科学

海域空间利用国土空间规划管控效率衡量环境规制陆海统筹

marine spatial utilizationplanning control and managementefficiency measurementenvironmental regulationland-sea coordination

《上海国土资源》 2026 (3)

92-100,9

国家社科基金研究专项研究项目(24VHQ008)自然资源部海洋空间资源管理技术重点实验室开放基金课题(KF-2023-103)温州市基础性科研项目(R20240108)

10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2026.03.010

评论