培育新质生产力导向的产业空间政策"地方创新"OACHSSCD

Fostering new-quality productive forces imposes new requirements on the governance of urban industrial spaces and the provision of industrial-land institutions.This study investigates the logic and formative mechanisms behind local-level innovations in China's industrial-space policies by examining six representative cities(Beijing,Shanghai,Guangzhou,Shenzhen,Hangzhou,and Suzhou)that have piloted industrial-land-system reforms.Drawing on policy-text analysis,this paper unpacks local innovations along two dimensions:discrepancies in the fine-grained rules of shared policy instruments,and city-tailored policy schemes.It further uncovers intrinsic linkages between policy practices and local developmental contexts.Results indicate that these six cities have adopted overlapping policy instruments to reduce industrial-land costs,roll out flexible land-supply regimes,encourage mixed land-use functions,and regulate property-right transfers.Pronounced divergences,however,persist in their detailed institutional designs.Each city has meanwhile developed distinct policy approaches.Beijing orchestrates mixed-use land development through planning cascading mechanisms,Shanghai delivers differentiated support for leading firms and industrial-park operators,Guangzhou prioritizes space guarantees for small-and medium-sized enterprises,Shenzhen advances market-oriented land-element reforms via sophisticated pricing frameworks,Hangzhou experiments with adaptive short-term land-use arrangements,and Suzhou pursues vertical industrial-space development together with consolidated supporting-facility provision.Such policy disparities are strongly associated with each city's market-agent composition,prioritized industrial sectors,spatial-resource endowments,and pre-existing governance frameworks.The findings offer practical insights for Chinese cities seeking to refine industrial-space policy systems in light of their unique developmental endowments.