首页|期刊导航|热带地理|中国三大城市群社会空间结构与模式比较

中国三大城市群社会空间结构与模式比较OA

Comparison of Socio-Spatial Structures and Patterns among China's Three Major Urban Agglomerations

中文摘要英文摘要

在城市群一体化发展的背景下,社会空间分异研究成为揭示城市群内部发展差异与空间不均衡的重要切入点.文章以京津冀、长三角、粤港澳三大城市群为研究对象,基于2023年百度慧眼人口画像数据,刻画城市群内部人口分布及其社会经济属性的空间格局,并系统解析三大城市群的社会空间层级结构、空间分布特征及分异模式.研究发现:三大城市群的人口及各项社会经济属性均呈现不同程度的核心城市集聚特征,社会空间层级均以中间层级为主体,但结构形态存在差异.三大城市群形成差异化社会空间分异模式:京津冀为"核心集聚、断层落差",长三角为"多核支撑、轴带延展",粤港澳为"环湾集聚、高位均衡",城市群社会空间分异受多维因素共同影响.在区域一体化持续推进的背景下,城市群内部社会空间分异仍存在,未来区域治理应更加重视教育、就业、住房和公共服务等生活机会的均衡配置.

In China,urban agglomerations are key spatial carriers of new urbanization and coordinated regional development.Existing studies on urban agglomerations have mainly focused on morphological structure,functional linkage,economic networks,and transportation connectivity,leaving the socio-spatial dimension relatively unattended.Studies on socio-spatial differentiation have also failed to address the cross-city distribution and hierarchical differentiation of socioeconomic groups within large urban agglomerations,mostly because these studies have largely concentrated on individual cities or neighborhoods.To address this gap,this paper takes the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(BTH)region,the Yangtze River Delta(YRD),and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area(GBA)as comparative cases.Based on the 2023 Baidu Huiyan population profile data,this study constructs a Socioeconomic Status Index(SESI)that integrates four indicators,namely,the proportions of high-income,highly educated,white-collar occupational,and high-consumption groups.Using standardized grid units,entropy weighting,natural breaks classification,and spatial visualization,this study compares the socio-spatial hierarchy,spatial distribution characteristics,and differentiation patterns of the three major urban agglomerations.The results show that socioeconomic attributes in all three agglomerations are concentrated in core cities,but their concentration patterns differ.The BTH features a high concentration of high-value groups in Beijing,the YRD exhibits a polycentric distribution,and the GBA is characterized by concentration around the Pearl River Estuary.The socio-spatial hierarchy also varies across the three regions.The BTH features a"middle-raised and two-end asymmetric"structure dominated by the middle level and with relatively prominent high and low levels,depicting a relatively strong degree of differentiation.The YRD forms an"olive-shaped"structure dominated by middle-level social spaces,reflecting relatively smoother hierarchical transitions.The GBA shows a structure dominated by high-level social spaces and a very small proportion of low-level spaces.This paper identifies three differentiated patterns:"Core Concentration and Stratified Disparity"in the BTH,"Multi-core Support and Axial Extension"in the YRD,and"Bay-area Concentration and High-level Equilibrium"in the GBA.It also develops a multidimensional explanatory framework that includes administrative resources and urban hierarchy,industrial division and employment opportunities,housing costs and livelihood opportunities,transport accessibility and spatial foundations,and openness and institutional coordination.This study extends socio-spatial research from the intra-urban scale to the urban agglomeration scale,integrates population big data with socioeconomic indicators,and offers policy implications for identifying socially disadvantaged spaces,stabilizing the middle strata,and promoting more equitable access to education,employment,housing,healthcare,and public services.

袁海雯;谢子涵;宋俊熙;吴威;宋伟轩;于凯

中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,南京 211135||中国科学院大学,北京 100049中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京 100872鲁东大学资源与环境工程学院,山东烟台 264025中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,南京 211135河海大学地理与遥感学院,流域水土过程省高校重点实验室,南京 211100中国城市规划设计研究院,北京 100044

社会科学

社会空间百度慧眼城市群区域一体化京津冀长三角粤港澳

social spaceBaidu Huiyanurban agglomerationsregional integrationBeijing-Tianjin-HebeiYangtze River DeltaGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

《热带地理》 2026 (10)

1973-1990,18

国家自然科学基金项目(4257128842171234)

10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20260181

评论