非名录乡村建筑遗产的价值研判与活化路径OACHSSCD

Non-listed rural architectural heritage that is not included in the statutory protection list has long been confronted with the practical dilemma of insufficient value recognition.Governed by the Outstanding Universal Value criterion and the triple standards of historical,artistic,and scientific value,the official identification system fails to effectively capture its quotidian public and living values.The Living Heritage Approach(LHA)advocates granting discursive agency to core communities,targeted precisely at daily heritage sites that are insufficiently acknowledged by elite narratives yet maintain living connections with local communities.The non-listed rural architectural heritage constitutes a tangible manifestation of living heritage within rural settings.Nevertheless,LHA is mainly a philosophical concept and governance framework at this stage,and it faces the urgent need to be translated into a participatory,accessible value assessment tool. This study conceptualizes"participatory evaluation"as an operational instrument of LHA.Based on the public value theory,a participatory value evaluation system encompassing five dimensions—cultural identity and memory,social equity and governance,living practice and inheritance,ecological wisdom and sustainability,and economic inclusiveness and revitalization—was established.It transforms the"discursive power of core communities"into implementable evaluation systems and procedures.In this study,a participatory value evaluation on non-listed rural architectural heritage in Chang'an District,Xi'an was carried out by constructing a comprehensive regional database and detailed description of typical cases. The research found that the value of non-listed rural architectural heritage is a dynamically constructed process built during community practices,and it is constantly produced,accumulated,and reconfigured through negotiation and interaction among various stakeholders.This agrees with the core connotations of LHA.The essence of architectural heritage lies not merely in the physical conservation of buildings but,more crucially,in the continuity of cultural processes.The formation of value consensus is co-determined by five interrelated key factors:1)higher levels of community organization facilitate smoother value negotiation;2)more intensive daily use sustains living values more effectively;3)the greater complexity of collective memory necessitates structured negotiation platforms;4)external interventions must adapt to local community contexts;and 5)cultural identity is the core mechanism to integrate diverse value demands and realize the cohesion of conservation awareness.These five influencing factors run through the progressive stages of value identification,value negotiation,consensus formation,and revitalization practice,and they exert distinct moderating effects at each phase.Based on the empirical results,four value typologies and corresponding revitalization strategies were put forward:1)memory-ecology dual-dominant heritage employs memory activation and hierarchical display;2)socially dominant heritage gives primacy to everyday public functions and endogenous governance;3)economy-memory co-dominant heritage seeks memory coexistence and benefit sharing;and 4)holistically balanced heritage adopts systematic conservation and cultural integration.According to the correspondence between these four value categories and revitalization strategies,the dominant dimensions on the value consensus map serve as anchor points requiring priority safeguards for heritage conservation,whereas underdeveloped dimensions provide references for risk management and targeted external intervention. The participatory value evaluation proposed in this study complements the evaluation system for listed heritage rather than negating its merits.It implements the philosophical concept of the"discursive power of core communities"in LHA into structured and replicable methodological instruments.It solves the gap between theory and practice,and it provides some methodological support for the integrated conservation of rural heritage.