BRAF V600E在甲状腺乳头状癌FNA与FFPE样本中检测一致性及诊断价值OA
Consistency and diagnostic value of BRAF V600E detection between FNA and FFPE samples in thyroid papillary carcinoma
目的 评估超声引导下细针穿刺(fine needle aspiration,FNA)样本与术后福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(forma⁃lin fixed paraffin embedded,FFPE)样本BRAF V600E突变检测在甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)中的一致性,并探讨其诊断价值.方法 收集119例行甲状腺手术且经病理证实的PTC,患者术前均行超声引导FNA,术后留取FFPE标本.FNA与FFPE样本均采用荧光PCR法检测BRAF V600E突变,应用统计学分析BRAF V600E突变与PTC临床病理特征的关系,探讨其诊断价值并比较FNA与FFPE样本检测的一致性.结果 患者年龄21~70岁,男女比为1∶3.1.肿瘤最大径≥1.0 cm 22例(18.5%),<1.0 cm 97例(81.5%);单灶肿块92例(77.3%),多灶肿块27例(22.7%);有淋巴结转移55例(46.2%).FNA与FFPE样本中BRAF V600E突变总体一致率为75.6%.FNA细胞学诊断Ⅱ-Ⅳ类的44例中,FNA BRAF V600E突变型36例(81.8%),FNA BRAF V600E野生型8例,且8例FNA BRAF V600E野生型术后FFPE检出结果均为FFPE BRAF V600E野生型,与FNA结果一致;FNA细胞学诊断Ⅴ-Ⅵ类的75例中,FNA BRAF V600E突变型65例(86.7%);余10例为FNA BRAF V600E野生型,且10例中有6例术后FFPE检出结果证实为FFPE BRAF V600E突变型.结论 FNA细胞学诊断在BRAF状态上的分布存在显著差异,但FNA与FFPE样本在BRAF V600E突变状态判断上的一致性有限,可能与多种原因有关;对于细胞学不确定病例,阴性结果仍建议结合临床高危特征综合评估,必要时手术后组织复核,以减少漏诊.
Objective To evaluate the concordance of BRAF V600E mutation detection between ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(FNA)samples and postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded(FFPE)samples in papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC)and to explore its diagnostic value.Methods A total of 119 patients with patho⁃logically confirmed PTC who underwent thyroid surgery were enrolled.All patients underwent ultrasound-guided FNA preoperatively,and FFPE specimens were collected postoperatively.BRAF V600E mutations were detected in both FNA and FFPE samples using fluorescence PCR.The relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and the clinico⁃pathological characteristics of PTC was statistically analyzed to explore its diagnostic value,and the concordance of de⁃tection between FNA and FFPE samples was compared.Results The patients'ages ranged from 21 to 70 years,with a male-to-female ratio of 1∶3.1.There were 22 cases(18.5%)with a maximum tumor diameter≥1.0 cm and 97 cases(81.5%)with a diameter<1.0 cm;92 cases(77.3%)had a single focal mass,and 27 cases(22.7%)had multifocal masses;lymph node metastasis was present in 55 cases(46.2%).The overall concordance rate for BRAF V600E mutation between FNA and FFPE samples was 75.6%.Among the 44 cases with FNA cytology diagnosis cat⁃egories Ⅱ-Ⅳ,36 cases(81.8%)were FNA BRAF V600E mutant,and 8 cases were FNA BRAF V600E wild-type.All 8 FNA BRAF V600E wild-type cases were confirmed as FFPE BRAF V600E wild-type postoperatively,consistent with the FNA results.Among the 75 cases with FNA cytology diagnosis categories Ⅴ-Ⅵ,65 cases(86.7%)were FNA BRAF V600E mutant;the remaining 10 cases were FNA BRAF V600E wild-type,and 6 of these 10 cases were confirmed as FFPE BRAF V600E mutant upon postoperative testing.Conclusion There is a significant difference in the distribution of BRAF status based on FNA cytology diagnosis.However,the concordance between FNA and FFPE samples in determining BRAF V600E mutation status is limited,which may be related to various factors.For cytologi⁃cally indeterminate cases,a negative result should still be evaluated in conjunction with clinical high-risk features.If necessary,postoperative tissue review is recommended to reduce missed diagnoses.
杨苗苗;宋雪雪;张玉莲;程一初;孟刚;章俊生
安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002安徽医科大学第一附属医院病理中心,合肥 230030||安徽省公共卫生临床中心临床病理中心,合肥 230002
医药卫生
甲状腺肿瘤乳头状癌BRAF V600E细针穿刺石蜡包埋组织
thyroid neoplasmspapillary carcinomaBRAF V600Efine-needle aspirationformalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
《临床与实验病理学杂志》 2026 (9)
1159-1164,6
安徽省公共卫生临床中心、安徽医科大学第一附属医院北区科研培育基金(2024YKJ02) The Scientific Research Cultivation Fund of Anhui Public Health Clinical Center(Northern Compus,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University)(2024YKJ02)
评论