《针灸甲乙经》与现行国家标准定位差异的比较研究OA

To clarify the differences in acupoint localization between classical literature and the current national standard,and to facilitate the transition of acupuncture from experience-based practice to standardized development,a comparative analysis was conducted between the Zhenjiu Jiayi Jing and Name and Location of Acupoints(GB/T 12346-2021).The study focused on 11 acupuncture points along the Hand-Taiyin lung meridian,examining differences in reference points,descriptive methods,and structural formats.The results indicated that Zhenjiu Jiayi Jing primarily relies on palpation,relative surface distances,and meridian pathways,emphasizing clinical experience.In contrast,the current national standard quantified and standardized acupuncture point localization based on modern anatomy,surface landmarks,and bone measurements,highlighting consistency and repeatability.These differences reflected the development of acupuncture from empirical practice to standardized methodology,influencing clinical point selection.This article argued that current acupoint localisation could be divided into textual localisation,standard localisation and operational localisation:in clinical practice,the current national standard should be used as a basis,referencing classical experience to achieve a synthesis,which facilitates rapid adaptation to clinical contexts and thereby forms operational localisation,thereby improving the precision and reliability of acupoint localisation.