首页|期刊导航|电工技术学报|弹性体增韧聚丙烯高压直流绝缘材料的电-力耦合机制与界面陷阱特性

弹性体增韧聚丙烯高压直流绝缘材料的电-力耦合机制与界面陷阱特性OA

Electrokinetic Coupling Mechanism and Interface Trap Characterization of Elastomer-Toughened Polypropylene for HVDC Insulation Materials

中文摘要英文摘要

为兼顾聚丙烯(PP)的低温韧性与高压直流(HVDC)的绝缘性能需求,该文以抗冲共聚聚丙烯(IPC)为基体,系统地对比了等质量分数的聚烯烃塑性体(POP)、聚烯烃弹性体(POE)及苯乙烯-乙烯/丁二烯-苯乙烯嵌段共聚物(SEBS)对 IPC 力学性能与直流电气特性的影响,并且深入地揭示了微观相态结构、结晶行为与电荷输运特性对界面陷阱介导的电-力耦合关联机制,阐明了界面相容性、相态形貌、陷阱分布、电荷输运、力学响应的跨尺度物理过程.研究结果表明,POP 与 POE 因与 IPC 相容性较差,其共混体系中弹性体相与基体间界面清晰分明,两相界面结合薄弱.这种界面缺陷状态在受力时易引发应力集中,从而导致共混体系力学性能显著降低.热刺激去极化电流(TSDC)测试进一步表明,POP 与 POE 共混体系中引入了大量且明显的浅陷阱,严重诱发了空间电荷积聚与局部电场畸变,进而致使材料的电气性能劣化.相比之下,SEBS 与IPC 展现出最优的相容性,分散相尺寸最小且界面致密无缺陷,共混体系结晶度最高,兼具最低的弯曲模量与最大的断裂伸长率,韧性表现最佳.尤为重要的是,SEBS 分子链中的苯环结构引入深能级陷阱,并在电极‑材料界面处形成极性屏蔽层,有效抑制了电极载流子注入,使体系电导电流最低,高温(80℃)下空间电荷积聚量最少,直流击穿场强虽略低于纯 IPC,但仍显著优于POP/IPC、POE/IPC 体系.综合电-力学协同性能与绝缘可靠性考量,SEBS 是高压直流电缆用可回收 PP 基绝缘材料的首选增韧改性剂.

To address the dual requirements of low-temperature toughness and high-voltage direct current(HVDC)insulating performance of polypropylene,impact copolymer polypropylene(IPC)was used as the matrix,and 30%of polyolefin plastomer(POP),polyolefin elastomer(POE),and styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene block copolymer(SEBS)were separately incorporated.A systematic comparison of their effects on microstructure,crystallization behavior,mechanical properties,and DC electrical characteristics was conducted,aiming to elucidate the electrical-mechanical coupling mechanism mediated by interfacial traps. The results show that POP and POE exhibit poor compatibility with IPC,presenting a coarse phase-separated morphology with sharp and distinct interfaces that act as stress concentration sites,leading to significant decreases in elongation at break and tensile strength.Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that both POP and POE promote the transformation from β-crystals to α-crystals:the crystallinity of the β(300)crystal plane decreases from 4.51%for pure IPC to 1.01%and 2.22%,respectively;correspondingly,the crystallinity determined by differential scanning calorimetry(DSC)drops from 40.97%to 32.40%(POP)and 23.49%(POE).The DSC curves further indicate that POP exhibits a viscous flow transition peak at 102.3℃,and POE at 35.3℃,implying insufficient thermodynamic stability.Thermally stimulated depolarization current(TSDC)measurements reveal that both blend systems introduce a large number of shallow traps with an energy level of approximately 0.95 eV at the interfaces.In particular,the IPC/POE system,owing to the highest interfacial defect concentration,exhibits a shallow trap density as high as 20.88×1021 eV-1·m-3.These shallow traps intensify carrier detrapping and charge injection,resulting in severe space charge accumulation and local electric field distortion,which ultimately cause a reduction of approximately 21%in the DC breakdown strength of both blends at 80℃compared with pure IPC. In striking contrast,SEBS demonstrates the best compatibility with IPC,featuring a dense and blurred interface,the smallest and most uniform dispersed phase domains.The polystyrene hard segments of SEBS act as heterogeneous nucleation agents,effectively inducing β-crystal formation and raising the β(300)crystallinity to 6.19%,while the DSC crystallinity remains at a relatively high level of 33.94%.No viscous flow transition is detected in this system.Dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA)confirms that the storage modulus decreases in the order of IPC>POP>POE>SEBS,and no abnormal increase in the loss factor is observed in the high-temperature region.Mechanical tests show that the IPC/SEBS blend exhibits the lowest flexural modulus,an elongation at break comparable to that of pure IPC,and nearly complete elastic recovery with minimal residual deformation in creep-recovery tests at 90℃.With regard to electrical performance,the phenyl groups in the SEBS segments introduce deep electron traps with an energy level of approximately 1.06 eV,while simultaneously forming a polar shielding layer at the electrode-dielectric interface,which effectively suppresses carrier injection and bulk transport.This dual mechanism endows the IPC/SEBS system with the lowest conduction current density over the entire electric field range of 5~40 kV/mm at both 30℃and 80℃,after polarization at 80℃,the residual space charge density is only 0.63 C/m3.the DC breakdown strength at 30℃is 2.2%higher than that of pure IPC,and although a slight decrease occurs at 80℃,it still significantly outperforms the POP and POE systems. The above results delineate an interfacial compatibility-mediated electrical-mechanical coupling mechanism:poor interfaces simultaneously act as mechanical stress concentrators and electrical shallow trap sources,synergistically degrading the toughness and insulating properties of the material;conversely,excellent interfacial bonding combined with intrinsic deep trap functionality can simultaneously achieve toughening and charge suppression.Therefore,SEBS can be considered a preferential toughening modifier for recyclable polypropylene-based insulating materials for HVDC cable applications.

赵新东;罗东旭;王凯;杨佳明;杨旭;赵洪

高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080高效能特种电缆技术全国重点实验室(哈尔滨理工大学) 哈尔滨 150080

信息技术与安全科学

高压直流(HVDC)聚丙烯弹性体增韧界面陷阱

High-voltage direct current(HVDC)polypropyleneelastomer tougheninginterface traps

《电工技术学报》 2026 (19)

6476-6490,15

黑龙江省自然科学基金研究团队资助项目(TD2025E003).

10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.260615

评论