TPO受体激动剂对比白细胞介素-11治疗血液肿瘤化疗后血小板减少症的单中心数据分析OA
A single-center data analysis comparing thrombopoietin receptor agonists with interleukin-11 for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in hematologic malignancies
目的:比较促血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs)与重组人白细胞介素-11(rhIL-11)治疗血液肿瘤化疗所致血小板减少症(CIT)的疗效、安全性及药物经济学差异.方法:纳入87例血液肿瘤CIT患者为研究对象,按用药方案不同将患者分为TPO-RAs组(n=43)和rhIL-11组(n=44).比较两组患者血小板恢复时间、应答率、不良事件发生情况及治疗成本.结果:两组患者血小板计数均随治疗时间增加(P<0.05),但组间无统计学差异(P>0.05).治疗后各时间点两组血小板计数差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).TPO-RAs组血小板恢复至>50 × 109/L、>75×109/L及>100× 109/L的达标率分别为83.7%、76.7%及60.5%,rhIL-11组分别为75.0%、65.9%及52.3%,两组达标率及中位恢复时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).多因素Cox回归分析显示,基线血小板水平是血小板恢复的独立影响因素(P<0.05),治疗组别未显示出与血小板恢复的统计学差异(P>0.05).TPO-RAs组不良事件发生率低于rhIL-11组(P<0.05).成本分析中,两组总成本无统计学差异(P>0.05),但艾曲泊帕亚组总成本在数值上最低.结论:TPO-RAs与rhIL-11治疗血液肿瘤CIT疗效相当,但TPO-RAs安全性更优.艾曲泊帕在成本数值上具有一定优势.基线血小板水平可作为评估恢复潜力的参考指标.
Objective:To compare the efficacy,safety,and pharmacoeconomic profiles of thrombopoietin receptor agonists(TPO-RAs)versus recombinant human interleukin-11(rhIL-11)in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia(CIT)in patients with hematologic malignancies.Methods:A total of 87 patients with CIT secondary to hematologic malignancies were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a TPO-RAs group(n=43)and an rhIL-11 group(n=44)according to treatment regimen.Platelet recovery time,response rate,adverse events,and treatment costs were compared between the two groups.Results:Platelet counts increased with treatment time in both groups,and there was no statistically significant difference in the trend of change between the groups(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in platelet counts between the two groups at each time point after treatment(P>0.05).The attainment rates of platelet count recovery to>50 × 109/L,>75 × 109/L,and>100 × 109/L in the TPO-RAs group were 83.7%,76.7%,and 60.5%,respectively,while those in the rhIL-11 group were 75.0%,65.9%,and 52.3%,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in attainment rate and median recovery time between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate Cox regression showed that baseline platelet level was an independent influencing factor for platelet recovery(P<0.05),while treatment group did not show statistical significance with platelet recovery(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse events in the TPO-RAs group was lower than that in the rhIL-11 group(P<0.05).In the cost analysis,there was no statistically significant difference in total cost between the two groups(P>0.05),but the total cost of the eltrombopag subgroup was the lowest in value.Conclusion:TPO-RAs and rhIL-11 demonstrate comparable efficacy in treating CIT in hematologic malignancies,whereas TPO-RAs offer a superior safety profile.Eltrombopag shows a numerical advantage in treatment cost.Baseline platelet level may serve as a reference indicator for assessing recovery potential.
万九超;管圣文;徐秋萍;王萧雅;赵攀
川北医学院附属医院血液内科,四川南充 637000川北医学院附属医院血液内科,四川南充 637000川北医学院附属医院血液内科,四川南充 637000川北医学院附属医院血液内科,四川南充 637000川北医学院附属医院血液内科,四川南充 637000
医药卫生
化疗所致血小板减少促血小板生成素受体激动剂重组人白细胞介素-11疗效安全性药物经济学分析
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopeniaThrombopoietin receptor agonistsRecombinant human interleukin-11EfficacySafetyPharmacoeconomic analysis
《川北医学院学报》 2026 (9)
1048-1053,6
四川省自然科学基金项目(2022NSFSC1416)
评论