首页|期刊导航|中国医院用药评价与分析|基于DRG的冠心病中成药临床用药路径构建与应用成效分析

基于DRG的冠心病中成药临床用药路径构建与应用成效分析OA

Construction and Application Effect Analysis of Clinical Pathway for Chinese Patent Medicines in Coronary Heart Disease Based on DRG

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的冠心病中成药临床用药路径对临床疗效、安全性及经济性的影响.方法:通过循证医学方法制定辨证用药路径,选取 2024 年 1-10 月该院心血管内科收治的冠心病患者,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各 140 例,最终纳入分析病例为观察组 136 例、对照组 134 例.观察组采用基于 DRG 与中医辨证分型制定的中成药临床用药路径,对照组采用常规治疗方案.比较两组患者的疗效性指标(死亡率、心血管事件发生率)、安全性指标(不合理医嘱、用药不良事件)及经济性指标(医保支付盈亏、住院天数、费用构成).结果:两组在死亡率及心血管事件发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组不合理医嘱发生率(0.74%vs.5.22%,P=0.040)和住院天数[6.00(4.00,7.00)d vs.6.00(5.00,8.00)d]均显著低于对照组(P<0.05).观察组药品总费用[1 957.38(1 199.51,2 606.58)元 vs.1 909.47(1 386.23,3 100.53)元]低于对照组(P=0.05).两组医保结余均增加(239 159.16 元 vs.187 508.26 元),差异无统计学意义(U=8 416.5,Z=-1.084,P=0.279).但观察组存在盈余更多的趋势,观察组平均盈余比对照组多 359.21 元,中位盈余较对照组多 533.34 元.住院总费用、中成药总费用与集采药品使用费用的组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:基于 DRG 的冠心病中成药临床用药路径可提升医嘱合理性,降低医疗成本,实现医保基金结余,在不影响临床安全性的前提下具有良好的经济性,适于在临床管理中推广应用.

OBJECTIVE:To explore the effects of clinical pathway for Chinese patent medicines in coronary heart disease(CHD)based on diagnosis-related groups(DRG)on clinical efficacy,safety,and cost-effectiveness.METHODS:An evidence-based approach was used to develop a pathway integrating syndrome differentiation.CHD patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology of the hospital from January to October 2024 were selected and randomly assigned into observation group and control group,with 140 cases in each group.Finally,136 cases in the observation group and 134 cases in the control group were included for analysis.The observation group followed the clinical pathway for Chinese patent medicines formulated based on DRGs and TCM syndrome differentiation,while the control group received conventional treatment.Efficacy indexes(mortality,the incidence of cardiovascular events),safety indexes(inappropriate medication orders,adverse drug events),and economic indexes(medical insurance balance,length of hospitalization stay,cost composition)were compared between 2 groups.RESULTS:There were no statistically significant difference in mortality or the incidence of cardiovascular events between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of irrational medical orders(0.74%vs.5.22%,P=0.040)and the length of hospital stay[6.00(4.00,7.00)d vs.6.00(5.00,8.00)d]in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The total drug costs in the observation group[1 957.38(1 199.51,2 606.58)yuan vs.1 909.47(1 386.23,3 100.53)yuan]were lower than those in the control group(P=0.05).The medical insurance surplus increased in both groups(239 159.16 yuan vs.187 508.26 yuan),with no statistically significant difference(U=8 416.5,Z=-1.084,P=0.279).However,there was a trend toward a greater surplus in the observation group:the mean surplus was 359.21 yuan higher and the median surplus was 533.34 yuan higher than those in the control group.There was no statistically significant difference in total hospitalization cost,total cost of Chinese patent medicines and the cost of centralized procurement drugs between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS:The DRG-based clinical pathway for Chinese patent medicines in CHD improves medication rationality,reduces medical costs,achieves a positive medical insurance balance,and has good cost-effectiveness on the premise of not affecting clinical safety,which is suitable for promotion and application in clinical management.

陈安;赵焕佳;全楚杰;潘敏;张家豪;彭淼浩

肇庆市第二人民医院临床药学科,广东 肇庆 526060肇庆市第二人民医院心血管内科,广东 肇庆 526060肇庆市第二人民医院心血管内科,广东 肇庆 526060肇庆市第二人民医院临床药学科,广东 肇庆 526060肇庆市第二人民医院临床药学科,广东 肇庆 526060肇庆市第二人民医院临床药学科,广东 肇庆 526060

医药卫生

疾病诊断相关分组冠心病中成药用药路径临床疗效

Diagnosis-related groupCoronary heart diseaseChinese patent medicineClinical pathwayClinical efficacy

《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2026 (9)

1103-1107,5

2024年度广东省中医药局中医药科研项目立项资助项目(No.20241384)

10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2026.09.017

评论