动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血血管内治疗院内结局的影响因素OA
Factors Associated with In-Hospital Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
目的 分析动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage,aSAH)血管内治疗患者院内结局的相关因素,并重点探讨破裂至介入穿刺时间(rupture-to-puncture time,RPT)与院内结局的关联. 方法 回顾性纳入2014年1月—2023年12月贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科收治的行血管内治疗的aSAH患者,按RPT≤6 h与RPT>6 h分组,比较两组基线临床及影像学特征、院内结局和并发症.采用多因素logistic回归分析院内死亡的相关因素,并采用倾向评分匹配和重叠加权进行敏感性分析. 结果 共纳入aSAH患者1053例,中位年龄55(48~63)岁,男性474例(45%).其中RPT≤6 h组41例,RPT>6 h组1012例.与RPT>6 h组相比,RPT≤6 h组入院GCS评分(P<0.001)、出院mRS评分0~2分的比例(P<0.001)和致密栓塞率(P=0.029)均较低,Hunt-Hess分级Ⅳ~Ⅴ级的比例、改良Fisher分级3~4级的比例和院内死亡率均较高(均P<0.001).多因素logistic回归分析显示,Hunt-Hess分级Ⅳ~Ⅴ级(OR 6.00,95%CI 2.96~12.17,P<0.001)、改良Fisher分级3~4级(OR 2.36,95%CI 1.21~4.60,P=0.012)、年龄每增加1岁(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.01~1.06,P=0.020)、RPT≤6 h(OR 5.26,95%CI 2.23~12.42,P<0.001)是导致院内死亡的独立危险因素.倾向评分匹配后,与RPT>6 h相比,RPT≤6 h与院内死亡仍相关(P=0.026).重叠加权分析显示,与RPT>6 h相比,RPT≤6 h仍与院内死亡相关(P=0.007),其余变量间的差异均无统计学意义. 结论 aSAH血管内治疗患者院内死亡与年龄、临床病情严重程度、影像学出血负荷及RPT等因素相关.RPT≤6 h患者多为重症高危人群,RPT可作为救治流程时效性的评价指标,但不宜脱离患者临床及影像学严重程度单独用于院内结局评估.
Objective To analyze factors associated with in-hospital outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage(aSAH)who underwent endovascular treatment,with particular emphasis on the association between rupture-to-puncture time(RPT)and in-hospital outcomes. Methods Patients with aSAH who underwent endovascular treatment at the Department of Neurosurgery,the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University between January 2014 and December 2023 were retrospectively included.Patients were divided into the RPT≤6 h group and the RPT>6 h group.Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics,in-hospital outcomes,and complications were compared between the two groups.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality,and propensity score matching and overlap weighting were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results A total of 1053 patients with aSAH were included,with a median age of 55(48-63)years,of whom 474(45%)were male.41 patients were in the RPT≤6 h group and 1012 patients were in the RPT>6 h group.Compared with the RPT>6 h group,the RPT≤6 h group had lower admission GCS scores(P<0.001),a lower proportion of patients with a discharge mRS score of 0-2(P<0.001),and a lower rate of dense embolization(P=0.029),whereas the proportions of Hunt-Hess grade Ⅳ-Ⅴ and modified Fisher grade 3-4 were higher,and the in-hospital mortality rate was higher(all P<0.001).Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that Hunt-Hess grade Ⅳ-Ⅴ(OR 6.00,95%CI 2.96-12.17,P<0.001),modified Fisher grade 3-4(OR 2.36,95%CI 1.21-4.60,P=0.012),each 1-year increase in age(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.01-1.06,P=0.020),and RPT≤6 h(OR 5.26,95%CI 2.23-12.42,P<0.001)were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.After propensity score matching,compared with RPT>6 h,RPT≤6 h remained associated with in-hospital mortality(P=0.026).Overlap weighting analysis showed that,compared with RPT>6 h,RPT≤6 h remained associated with in-hospital mortality(P=0.007),whereas no statistically significant differences were found for the remaining variables. Conclusions In-hospital mortality in patients with aSAH undergoing endovascular treatment is associated with age,clinical disease severity,radiographic hemorrhage burden,and RPT.Patients with RPT≤6 h are predominantly critically ill and at high risk.RPT may serve as an indicator for evaluating the timeliness of the treatment pathway,but assessment of in-hospital outcomes should not rely on RPT alone and should also incorporate clinical and radiographic severity.
石登帅;崔君拴;彭瀚;徐卡娅;向欣;杨华
贵阳 550004 贵州医科大学临床医学院贵阳 550002 贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科贵阳 550002 贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科贵阳 550002 贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科贵阳 550002 贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科贵阳 550002 贵州医科大学附属医院神经外科
医药卫生
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血血管内治疗破裂至介入穿刺时间院内死亡预后
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageEndovascular treatmentRupture-to-puncture timeIn-hospital mortalityPrognosis
《中国卒中杂志》 2026 (9)
1140-1147,8
国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(82560249)
评论