基于熵权TOPSIS和障碍度模型的我国创新药审评审批评价OA
Evaluation of innovative drug review and approval in China based on entropy-weighted TOPSIS and obstacle degree model
目的 评价2020至2024年我国创新药审评审批发展水平,识别主要障碍因素.方法 收集2020至2024年度药品审评报告和中国新药注册临床试验年度报告,从申请活跃度、审评审批产出、加快上市支持和临床试验支撑4个维度构建9项指标体系,采用熵权逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)和障碍度模型进行评价,并开展稳健性检验.结果 上市许可申请受理、优先审评审批和批准/建议批准创新药权重较高.2020至2024年综合得分分别为0.01、0.50、0.27、0.72和0.84,整体呈波动上升;等权TOPSIS和权重扰动分析排序与原结果一致.障碍因素由早期上市申报转化和批准产出不足,逐步转向附条件批准精准适用和Ⅲ期临床试验支撑不足.结论 2020至2024年我国创新药审评审批发展水平总体提升,但各环节改善并不同步,仍需加强上市申报辅导、加快上市程序适用和临床证据形成的协同.
Objective To evaluate the development level of innovative drug review and approval in China from 2020 to 2024 and identify major obstacle factors.Methods Data were collected from annual drug review reports and annual reports on new drug registration clinical trials from 2020 to 2024.A nine-index system was constructed from four dimensions,including application activity,review and approval output,accelerated marketing support,and clinical trial support.The entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)model and obstacle degree model were used,and robustness tests were performed.Results Marketing authorization application acceptance,priority review and approval,and approved or recommended innovative drugs had relatively high weights.The comprehensive scores from 2020 to 2024 were 0.01,0.50,0.27,0.72 and 0.84,respectively,showing a fluctuating upward trend.The rankings obtained from equal-weight TOPSIS and weight perturbation analysis were consistent with the original results.The obstacle factors gradually shifted from insufficient marketing application transformation and approval output in the early stage to the precise application of conditional approval and insufficient phase Ⅲ clinical trial support.Conclusion From 2020 to 2024,the development level of innovative drug review and approval in China improved overall,but improvements across different links were not synchronous.Coordination among marketing application guidance,application of accelerated marketing procedures,and clinical evidence generation still needs to be strengthened.
梁绍忠;石荣丽;崔洪瑞
广东药科大学 医药商学院,广东 广州 510006||广东省药品监管科学研究基地,广东 广州 510006||国家药品监督管理局药物警戒技术研究与评价重点实验室,广东 广州 510006广东药科大学 医药商学院,广东 广州 510006||广东省药品监管科学研究基地,广东 广州 510006||国家药品监督管理局药物警戒技术研究与评价重点实验室,广东 广州 510006广东药科大学 医药商学院,广东 广州 510006||广东省药品监管科学研究基地,广东 广州 510006||国家药品监督管理局药物警戒技术研究与评价重点实验室,广东 广州 510006
医药卫生
创新药审评审批熵权逼近理想解排序模型障碍度模型障碍因素
innovative drugreview and approvalentropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution modelobstacle degree modelobstacle factor
《中国临床药理学杂志》 2026 (16)
2382-2388,7
广州市哲学社会科学发展"十四五"规划2023年度共建课题(2023GZGJ68)
评论