学术发明人的界定、制度逻辑与识别框架研究OACHSSCD

[Purpose/Significance]In the current era,the boundaries between science and technology have become increasingly blurred.Academic inventors,who possess the dual identities of scholar and inventor,play a critical bridge role between science and technology.This study addresses research gaps by exploring the concept,institutional motiva-tions,and identification frameworks of academic inventors.[Method/Process]The study was conducted through a three-dimensional analysis involving conceptual,institutional,and methodological perspectives.Firstly,the study grounded the definition of academic inventors in the theories of Mode 2 knowledge production,the Triple Helix innovation model,and academic capitalism to explain their boundary-spanning nature.Secondly,an analytical framework based on multiple insti-tutional logics was constructed,incorporating regulative,normative,and cultural-cognitive dimensions to reveal the envi-ronmental drivers behind the emergence of this group.This framework explained how external policies,organizational norms,and internal cognitive schemas interacted to support sustainable cross-boundary practices.Methodologically,the study proposed a multidimensional identification system focusing on participation,duality,and bridge.The identification process utilized a multi-level matching mechanism—encompassing subject,name,and institution—across patent and pub-lication databases.To enable precise categorization,the"Pasteur's Quadrant"model was introduced to generate fine-grained feature profiles of academic inventors across four distinct types:star,liaison,potential,and focused.Finally,the study analyzed practical application scenarios to ensure the framework's utility in real-world policy and management con-texts.[Result/Conclusion]The findings demonstrate that the study of academic inventors must evolve from simple binary matching of patents and papers toward deep feature profiling.The results show that academic inventors effectively resolve the logical conflicts between scientific discovery and technological application through identity bridging,organizational mediation,and the hybridization of outputs.The proposed framework provides robust tools for resolving evaluation dile-mmas in academic institutions and offers a scientific basis for implementing differentiated talent cultivation strategies and strategic regional innovation layouts.While the current framework emphasizes"paper-patent"duality,future research could further explore the dynamic evolution of academic inventors across their careers and integrate emerging data forms,such as open-source code and AI-driven outputs,to enhance the framework's predictive capabilities.