首页|期刊导航|心理科学进展|心理治疗的忠实度测量:现状与改进

心理治疗的忠实度测量:现状与改进OACHSSCD

Fidelity measurement in psychotherapy:Current status and improvements

中文摘要英文摘要

心理治疗的忠实度(fidelity)指心理治疗按预定方案实施的程度,是保障临床实践质量,验证疗效可靠性的关键指标.为填补国内学界在心理治疗过程质量评估中忠实度研究的空白,本文系统梳理了其概念构成与测量必要性,比较了常用测量方法的优势与局限,并评述了现有改进策略的贡献与不足.综述现有研究发现:观察性编码、书面调查法和行为排练等方法虽各有特点,但存在耗时耗力、适用范围有限及评分一致性不足等问题;近年来,围绕测量框架建设、干预措施的精确描述和计算机辅助评估的探索,在一定程度上提升了忠实度测量的规范性与效率,但仍难以同时解决长期存在的"高成本"与"评估不一致"问题.未来研究需进一步完善忠实度测量框架,建立统一知识库,并持续推进自动化评估工具(如大语言模型)在心理治疗情境中的实证检验,从而推动心理治疗过程质量评估从理论倡议走向标准化实践.

Fidelity in psychotherapy refers to the extent to which treatment is delivered as intended,serving as a key indicator of clinical quality and the reliability of therapeutic outcomes.Given the limited domestic research on fidelity in the evaluation of psychotherapy processes,this article reviews its conceptual structure and the rationale for its assessment,compares common assessment methods,and discusses current strategies for improvement.Existing studies indicate that observational coding,written surveys,and behavioral rehearsals each have distinct features and limitations.Across current approaches,major challenges include substantial demands on time and labor,limited applicability,and low scoring consistency.Recent efforts to develop assessment frameworks,specify intervention procedures,and introduce computer-assisted assessment have improved standardization and efficiency to some extent.However,the persistent issues of high costs and inconsistent assessment remain unresolved.Future research may further refine the assessment framework,establish a more systematic knowledge base,and continue exploring and validating automated tools such as large language models in psychotherapy settings,thereby advancing the quality assessment of psychotherapy processes from theoretical advocacy to standardized practice.

杨浩然;孙焕翔;刘晓明

东北师范大学心理学院,长春 130024东北师范大学心理学院,长春 130024东北师范大学心理学院,长春 130024

医药卫生

忠实度心理治疗心理咨询测量方法评估框架

fidelitypsychotherapypsychological counselingmeasurement methodsevaluation framework

《心理科学进展》 2026 (10)

1843-1861,19

10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1843

评论