首页|期刊导航|西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)|算法权力的政治张力:去政治化与再政治化

算法权力的政治张力:去政治化与再政治化OACHSSCD

The Political Tension of Algorithmic Power:Depoliticization and Repoliticization

中文摘要英文摘要

随着数字技术的蓬勃发展,算法已超越工具范畴而演变为塑造秩序与规训行为的新兴权力形态.透过辩证视角探察算法权力的运作逻辑,揭示其去政治化与再政治化的悖反张力.去政治化倾向提高了技术效率,但侵蚀了公民社会的自治空间与政治主体性.当代民主的悖论在于,民主制度为维系自身正当性,必然回应公民诉求、关注社会正义,但民主运作又极可能将社会矛盾与不确定性简化为程序性规则,以致政治实践陷入形式化困境.算法权力的认知操纵、主体异化、空间封闭与权力僭越等去政治化效应,正是这一悖论在数字时代的呈现,其呼唤认知觉醒、主体重塑、空间正义与权力驾驭等再政治化的价值理性复归.据此,在反思算法政治悖论的基础上,以差异哲学为底色,探寻价值引领、协同共治、普惠共享以及法治约束等技术向善的政治张力消解出路.由是拓展了算法政治的批判性理论视野,为具有中国特色的算法治理与数字政治文明建设提供学理支撑与实践启示.

The integration of digital technology into social development has transformed algorithms from mere tools into a new form of power that reshapes societal order and influences behavior.This power,often presented as technologically neutral,employs political strategies as data metrics,resulting in the dominance of technological rationality over value rationality.Consequently,this shift has precipitated a crisis of depoliticization in algorithmic power,manifesting in issues such as technological reverse-taming,depersonalization,social segmentation,and erosion of legal authority.In an era characterized by technological advancement and social change,a dialectical examination of this tension is both a theoretical necessity for addressing the governance of technological risks and a practical imperative for navigating the process of Chinese-style modernization,which seeks to harness the logic of capital and promote the benefits of science and technology.From a theoretical perspective,the existing algorithmic research focuses on the collusion between algorithmic techniques and capital logic in the acquisition of ideological power,as well as the reconfiguration of the orderliness of the network value ecosystem by intelligent algorithms.However,it lacks the revelation of the paradoxical political logic of algorithmic power operation.Therefore,analyzing the dialectical tension inherent in algorithmic power emerges as a critical topic within the field of algorithmic politics research. The depoliticization of algorithmic power supplants public affairs characterized by value conflicts with incontrovertible data computation,thereby constructing an illusion of a de-ideologized technological governance.Cognitively,this illusion erodes public rational deliberation through technological reverse-taming.At an ontological level,it transforms political subjects into disciplined individuals functioning as data nodes,a phenomenon described as Digital Taylorism.Furthermore,the unequal distribution of flow constrains the openness of public spaces,while the replacement of algorithmic rules for legal authority results in the ethical suspension of administrative power and a lack of responsibility. The repoliticization of algorithmic power requires awakening public awareness,breaking the"black box"of algorithms through transparency and openness to reach social consensus.In terms of the subjects,it aims to confirm digital rights to transform workers from objects of algorithmic systems into political subjects.At the same time,it strives to bridge the digital divide caused by flow distribution within the space by following the concepts of fairness and justice.Ultimately,it relies on the modernization of state capabilities and legal regulations to achieve the control of algorithmic power. In conclusion,this paper presents a framework for alleviating the political tensions associated with algorithmic power.It is essential to establish the leading role of mainstream ideology and to internalize ethical norms as the foundational logic of algorithms.Within production relations,it is crucial to enhance multi-party collaborative governance,protect the rights and interests of digital labor,and stimulate individual initiative to achieve a political equilibrium between employers and employees.In terms of social structure,it adheres to the principle of common prosperity and adopts inclusive digital inclusion measures to care for diverse groups.By leveraging the modernization of national governance capacity,a comprehensive legal framework must be developed to regulate the algorithmic power.

高进;黄种兴

东北大学 文法学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169东北大学 文法学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169

信息技术与安全科学

算法权力政治张力去政治化再政治化数字技术权力运作算法治理

algorithmic powerpolitical tensiondepoliticizationrepoliticizationdigital technologypower operationalgorithmic governance

《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (5)

145-154,10

国家社会科学基金项目(22BZZ028)中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目(N25BSS061).

10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.202605013

评论