首页|期刊导航|实验技术与管理|基于Pathfinder的高校宿舍楼应急疏散仿真分析

基于Pathfinder的高校宿舍楼应急疏散仿真分析OA

Simulation analysis of emergency evacuation in university dormitory buildings using Pathfinder

中文摘要英文摘要

为探究大学校园人员疏散过程中的关键影响因素,并为大学校园疏散管理提供科学依据和优化建议,文章采用 Pathfinder 行人疏散仿真软件,针对典型高校宿舍楼场景进行多因素仿真分析,重点研究人员比例、人员载荷率、建筑设计等因素对疏散效率的影响.研究表明:当人员载荷率不超过 60%时,宿舍楼道出口位置对疏散时间影响较小;随着载荷率的增加,楼道出口位置的影响逐渐显著.楼道出口位于楼梯对面时效率最高,位于建筑正中心时楼梯拥堵程度最低,而位于宿舍楼两侧时易引发拥堵.当人员载荷率>60%时,在宿舍内每张床中间设置一组爬梯可达到最高疏散效率,而在两张床中间设置一组爬梯则效率最低.

[Objective]University dormitories have high occupant density and complex internal layouts,which create serious challenges for evacuation during fires or other emergencies.Traditional evacuation drills are costly,difficult to repeat,and involve safety risks.Mathematical models often ignore real pedestrian behavior and building features.Therefore,computer simulation is necessary to study evacuation across occupancy and design conditions.This study uses the Pathfinder software to analyze how pedestrian density,exit locations,and internal stairway designs affect evacuation time in a typical six-story women's dormitory.The goal is to provide clear design recommendations to improve campus safety management and emergency planning.[Methods]The evacuation process was simulated using the Pathfinder pedestrian evacuation software.The building model was built using exact architectural data:each floor measures 75.6 m×12.6 m,is 3 m in height,and contains standard four-person rooms.All simulated pedestrians were assigned identical physical traits and walking speeds(1.45 m/s,height 1.599 m,shoulder width 35.4 cm)to represent female college students.Five occupancy levels were tested:20%,40%,60%,80%,and 100%.The simulation systematically evaluated two primary architectural variables:exit placement and internal dormitory staircase configuration.Three exit layouts were tested:exits positioned opposite the staircases,at the building's central axis,and along the lateral sides.Additionally,four internal staircase arrangements within the dorm rooms were examined,varying in location(between paired beds,adjacent to each bed,or near the room exit)and width.Key performance indicators,including total evacuation time,average staircase congestion duration,and dynamic pedestrian flow rates at exits,were quantitatively analyzed.[Results]The results show that building occupancy largely determines how building design affects evacuation.When the occupancy rate is 60%or lower,changing exit locations or stairway layouts has little effect on total evacuation time because low crowd density naturally prevents serious delays.However,when the rate exceeds 60%,design choices become crucial.For exit locations,placing exits directly opposite the main stairways gives the shortest evacuation time and the most stable pedestrian flow.Placing exits in the center of the building reduces the time that stairways remain crowded,making the evacuation process more stable.Placing exits on the sides causes uneven crowds and local blockages.For internal room stairways,the layout matters most when the building is full.Putting one small stairway between each bed gives the fastest room evacuation.The common design of sharing one stairway between two beds is the slowest.Adding width to the stairways helps at medium occupancy levels,but placing the stairways in better positions is more effective than only widening them.[Conclusions]This study shows that the dormitory evacuation rate depends on crowd density and building design.In crowded conditions,placing exits opposite the main stairways reduces total evacuation time and keeps pedestrian flow steady.Center exits help prevent stairway blockages.Inside dorm rooms,giving each bed its own small stairway works better than the traditional shared design.These results provide practical guidance for architects and campus safety managers on improving exit placement,avoiding bottlenecks,and updating emergency plans.Future studies should incorporate realistic human behaviors,such as panic and group movement,to improve simulation accuracy and support the development of more effective evacuation systems for university buildings.

李娜;赵小川;秦胜慧

内蒙古工业大学 理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010051内蒙古工业大学 理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010051内蒙古工业大学 理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010051

信息技术与安全科学

高校宿舍楼人员载荷率人员疏散疏散仿真Pathfinder仿真软件

university dormitory buildingsperson load factorevacuation of personnelevacuation simulationPathfinder simulation software

《实验技术与管理》 2026 (9)

137-143,7

内蒙古自治区自然科学基金面上项目(2024MS07002)内蒙古自治区重点研发和成果转化计划项目(2025YFHH0215)

10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.09.017

评论