经皮耳穴电刺激对减药或不减药的慢性精神分裂症患者的阴性症状及认知功能的影响OA
Effect of transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture on negative symp-toms and cognitive function in chronic schizophrenia patients with or without medication reduction
目的 探讨经皮耳穴电刺激对减药或不减药慢性精神分裂症患者阴性症状及认知功能的影响.方法 选取2025年1月至6月中山市第三人民医院收治的60例慢性精神分裂症患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为减药+假刺激组(15例)、不减药+假刺激组(15例)、减药+真刺激组(15例)和不减药+真刺激组(15例).最终56例完成研究并纳入统计分析,其中减药+假刺激组14例、不减药+假刺激组14例、减药+真刺激组15例、不减药+真刺激组13例.减药+假刺激组给予抗精神病药物减量25%联合经皮耳穴假刺激干预,不减药+假刺激组给予维持原抗精神病药物剂量联合经皮耳穴假刺激干预,减药+真刺激组给予抗精神病药物减量25%联合经皮耳穴电刺激干预,不减药+真刺激组给予维持原抗精神病药物剂量联合经皮耳穴电刺激干预.比较四组患者干预前后阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分及威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)各指标.结果 干预后,四组患者PANSS阴性量表评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预后,减药+真刺激组PANSS阴性量表评分低于不减药+假刺激组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,四组患者一般精神病理量表评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预后,减药+真刺激组一般精神病理量表评分低于减药+假刺激组和不减药+假刺激组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,四组患者阳性量表评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).干预后,四组患者WCST总应答数、完成分类数、错误应答数及持续性错误数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预后,减药+真刺激组总应答数和持续性错误数低于减药+假刺激组,错误应答数低于减药+假刺激组和不减药+假刺激组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).四组正确应答数、持续应答数及非持续性错误数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在抗精神病药物减量基础上联合经皮耳穴电刺激,可改善慢性精神分裂症患者的阴性症状及认知功能;单纯减药或单纯经皮耳穴电刺激均未显示明确获益.
Objective To investigate the effects of transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture on negative symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia with or without medication reduction.Methods Sixty patients with chronic schizophrenia admitted to Zhongshan Third People's Hospital from January 2025 to June 2025 were enrolled and randomly assigned to four groups:medication reduction+sham stimulation(n=15),no medication reduction+sham stimu-lation(n=15),medication reduction+real stimulation(n=15),and no medication reduction+real stimulation(n=15).Fifty-six patients completed the study and were included in the final analysis:14 in the medication reduction+sham stimulation group,14 in the no medication reduction+sham stimulation group,15 in the medication reduction+real stimulation group,and 13 in the no medication reduction+real stimulation group.The medication reduction+sham stimulation group received a 25%reduction in the baseline antipsychotic dose combined with transcutaneous auricular sham stimulation.The no medication reduction+sham stimula-tion group received the original antipsychotic dose com-bined with sham stimulation.The medication reduction+real stim ulation group received a 25%dose reduction combined with transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture.The no medication reduction+real stimulation group received the original antipsychotic dose combined with transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture.Positive and negative syndrome scale(PANSS)scores and Wisconsin card sorting test(WCST)indices were assessed before and after intervention.Results After intervention,the comparison of PANSS negative scale scores among the four groups showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Among them,the PANSS negative scale score of the medication reduction+real stimulation group was lower than that of the no medication reduction+sham stimulation group,and the difference was statistically significant(ad-justed P<0.05).After intervention,the comparison of general psychopathological scale scores among the four groups showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Among them,the general psychopathological scale score of the medication re-duction+real stimulation group was lower than that of the medication reduction+sham stimulation group and the no medication reduction+sham stimulation group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the comparison of positive scale scores among the four groups showed no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).After intervention,the comparison of total responses,completed classifications,error responses,and persistent error numbers of the WCST among the four groups showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Among them,the total responses and persistent error numbers of the medication reduction+real stimulation group were lower than those of the medication reduction+sham stimulation group,and the error responses were lower than those of the medication reduction+sham stimulation group and the no medication reduction+sham stimulation group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The comparison of correct responses,continuous responses,and non-persistent errors among the four groups showed no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion Transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture com-bined with antipsychotic dose reduction may improve negative symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia,whereas medication reduction alone or transcutaneous auricular electroacupuncture alone did not show clear benefits.
卢惠鹏;伍思健;辛静丽;谭振昆;黄银樱;包海琳;李奕浪
广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院防保科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451广东省中山市第三人民医院精神康复科,广东中山 528451
医药卫生
精神分裂症经皮耳穴电刺激减药阴性症状认知功能
SchizophreniaTranscutaneous auricular electroacupunctureMedication reductionNegative symptomsCog-nitive function
《中国当代医药》 2026 (24)
42-47,6
广东省中山市中医药传承创新发展科研专项项目(2024B3049).
评论