首页|期刊导航|中国当代医药|雾化吸入联合体位引流对急性支气管炎患者的应用效果

雾化吸入联合体位引流对急性支气管炎患者的应用效果OA

Effect of atomization inhalation combined with postural drainage on pa-tients with acute bronchitis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨雾化吸入联合体位引流对急性支气管炎患者的应用效果.方法 选取2023年5月至2025年4月大连大学附属中山医院收治的80例急性支气管炎患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为引流组(n=40)与雾化组(n=40).引流组采用常规治疗+体位引流,雾化组采用常规治疗+雾化吸入联合体位引流.比较两组患者临床症状改善、咳嗽缓解程度、肺功能、气道阻力指标.结果 雾化组患者的剧烈咳嗽消失时间、咳嗽完全消失时间、咳痰困难消失时间、肺部啰音消失时间、胸闷/气促消失时间短于引流组,排痰效果高于引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,雾化组患者的莱塞斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)评分高于引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,雾化组患者的肺活量(VC)、肺总量(TLC)、每分钟最大通气量(MVV)高于引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,雾化组患者的气道黏性阻力(R20)、气道总黏性阻力(R5)、气道总阻抗(Z5)低于引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 在急性支气管炎治疗中,雾化吸入联合体位引流的方案,相较于单纯体位引流联合常规药物治疗优势显著,能更快速缓解患者咳嗽、咳痰困难、胸闷气促症状,缩短肺部啰音消失时间;同时可更有效改善患者生活质量,优化肺功能,降低气道阻力.

Objective To explore the application effect of aerosol inhalation combined with postural drainage in patients with acute bronchitis.Methods A total of 80 patients with acute bronchitis admitted to the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from May 2023 to April 2025 were selected as the research subjects and they were divided into the drainage group(n=40)and the nebulization group(n=40)according to the random number table method.The drainage group received conventional treatment combined with postural drainage,while the nebulization group received conventional treatment combined with nebulization inhalation and postural drainage.The clinical symptom improvement,degree of cough relief,lung function,and airway resistance indicators of the two groups were compared.Results The time for severe cough to disappear,the time for complete cough to cease,the time for difficulty in expectoration to subside,the time for lung rales to disappear,and the time for chest tightness/shortness of breath to resolve were shorter in the nebulization group than in the drainage group.The expectoration effect of the nebulization group was better than that of the drainage group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the Leicester cough questionnaire(LCQ)score of patients in the nebulization group was higher than that of the drainage group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the vital capacity(VC),total lung capacity(TLC),and maximum voluntary ventilation(MVV)of patients in the nebulization group were higher than those in the drainage group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the airway viscous resistance(R20),total airway viscous resistance(R5),and total air-way impedance(Z5)of patients in the nebulization group were lower than those in the drainage group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of acute bronchitis,the combined use of aerosol inhala-tion and postural drainage has significant advantages over simple postural drainage combined with conventional drug therapy.It can more quickly relieve symptoms such as coughing,difficulty in expectoration,chest tightness and shortness of breath in patients,shorten the time for disappearance of pulmonary rales;at the same time,it can more effectively improve the quality of life of patients,optimize lung function and reduce airway resistance.

贾小嫚;吴少华;刘琳琳;金丽英;陈丹

大连大学附属中山医院发热门诊,辽宁大连 116001大连大学附属中山医院发热门诊,辽宁大连 116001大连大学附属中山医院发热门诊,辽宁大连 116001大连大学附属中山医院发热门诊,辽宁大连 116001大连大学附属中山医院发热门诊,辽宁大连 116001

医药卫生

雾化吸入体位引流急性支气管炎咳嗽缓解痰液排出

Nebulized inhalationPostural drainageAcute bronchitisCough reliefSputum excretion

《中国当代医药》 2026 (24)

19-23,5

10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2026.24.04

评论