首页|期刊导航|中国当代医药|雾化吸入多黏菌素治疗儿童耐药菌感染有效性和安全性的meta分析

雾化吸入多黏菌素治疗儿童耐药菌感染有效性和安全性的meta分析OA

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of nebulized inhalation of polymyxin in the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections in children

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 通过meta分析系统评价雾化吸入多黏菌素治疗儿童耐药菌感染的有效性和安全性.方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据知识服务平台和维普中文科技期刊数据库等中英文数据库,检索时限为各数据库建库至2025年12月31日.由两名研究员对检索的所有文献进行独立筛选,对符合纳入标准的研究进行文献质量评价和数据提取,并采用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析.结果 最终共纳入7篇文献,包括387例患儿.结果显示雾化吸入多黏菌素组机械通气时长短于非雾化多黏菌素组[MD=-4.22,95%CI(-5.96~-2.47)],肾功能损伤发生率低于非雾化吸入多黏菌素组[RD=-0.08,95%CI(-0.15~-0.01)];支气管痉挛发生率高于非雾化吸入多黏菌素组[OR=4.95,95%CI(1.09~22.39)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组患儿的临床治愈率、微生物清除率、住院时长和神经毒性发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 雾化吸入多黏菌素能缩短机械通气时长.在安全性方面,其肾功能损伤发生率更低,但支气管痉挛发生风险相对更高.雾化吸入多黏菌素在儿童耐药菌感染中的有效性和安全性仍需更多高质量的研究来进一步证实.

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized inhalation of polymyxin in the treat-ment of drug-resistant bacterial infections in children by meta-analysis.Methods The computer was used to search various Chinese and English databases such as PubMed,Embase,Ovid,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,China Biomedical Literature database,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal database.The search period covered the entire period from the establishment of each database to December 31,2025.Two researchers independently screened all the retrieved literature,evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data.Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.Results A total of 7 studies were included,in-volving 387 children.The results showed that the duration of mechanical ventilation in the polymyxin group was shorter than that in the non-humidified polymyxin group(MD=-4.22,95%CI[-5.96--2.47]),and the incidence of renal function im-pairment was lower in the group receiving nebulized inhalation than in the group without nebulization(RD=-0.08,95%CI[-0.15--0.01]),the incidence of bronchospasm was higher in the group receiving nebulized inhalation than in the group without nebulization(OR=4.95,95%CI[1.09-22.39]),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in clinical cure rate,microbial clearance rate,hospital stay,and incidence of neurotoxicity between the two groups of children(P>0.05).Conclusion Nebulized inhalation can shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation.In terms of safety,the incidence of renal function impairment is lower,but the risk of bronchospasm is relatively higher.The effectiveness and safety of nebu-lized inhalation in children with drug-resistant bacterial infections still require more high-quality studies to further confirm.

李国庆;张杜娟;焦萍;李国辉

山东第一医科大学附属济南妇幼保健院药剂科,山东济南 250000山东第一医科大学附属济南妇幼保健院药剂科,山东济南 250000山东第一医科大学附属济南妇幼保健院药剂科,山东济南 250000山东第一医科大学附属济南妇幼保健院药剂科,山东济南 250000

医药卫生

雾化吸入多黏菌素儿童耐药有效性安全性Meta分析

Nebulized inhalationPolymyxinChildrenDrug resistanceEfficacySafetyMeta-analysis

《中国当代医药》 2026 (22)

20-26,7

山东省济南市卫生健康委员会科技发展计划项目(2024304004).

10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2026.22.04

评论