两种微创术式治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的疗效对比研究OA
Comparative study on the efficacy of two minimally invasive surgical approaches in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis
目的:对比分析腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术(LCBDE)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)联合 LC 治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的临床疗效.方法:选取 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 9 月收治的 104 例胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者作为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为观察组(行 LCBDE+LC)与对照组(行 ERCP+LC),每组 52 例.对比两组手术相关指标、并发症发生率、胆道括约肌功能、生活质量、短期复发率.结果:两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组手术时间长于对照组,术后肛门排气时间、首次下床活动时间、住院时间短于对照组,术后 24 h 评痛评分、住院费用、术后并发症发生率低于对照组;术后 6 个月,观察组 Oddi 括约肌基础压、胆总管基础压下降幅度、括约肌松弛率上升幅度小于对照组,生活质量综合评定问卷评分上升幅度大于对照组;术后 12 个月,观察组结石复发率、再次手术率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:与 ERCP+LC 相比,LCBDE+LC 治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的临床疗效更好,可提高结石清除率与患者生活质量,缩短住院时间,减少住院费用,降低并发症发生率与复发率,对胆道括约肌有保护作用.
Objective:To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE)combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)combined with LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis.Methods:A total of 104 patients with choledocholithiasis and cholecysto-lithiasis who were admitted from Sep.2023 to Sep.2024 were enrolled.All patients were assigned to the observation group(treated with LCBDE+LC)and the control group(treated with ERCP+LC)by the random number table method,with 52 patients in each group.The surgery-related indicators,incidence of complications,biliary sphincter function,quality of life and short-term recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).The observation group had longer operative time,shorter postoperative anal exhaust time,first ambulation time and hospital stay,as well as lower 24 h postoperative pain score,hospitalization cost and incidence of postoperative complications compared with the control group.At 6 months after surgery,the decreased amplitude of Oddi sphincter pressure and basal common bile duct pres-sure,and the increased amplitude of the sphincter relaxation rate in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,while the increase in generic quality of life inventory score was higher in the observation group.At 12 months after surgery,the stone re-currence rate and reoperation rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and all the differences were statis-tically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Compared with ERCP+LC,LCBDE+LC has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of cho-ledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis.It can improve the stone clearance rate and patients′ quality of life,shorten hospital stay,re-duce hospitalization costs,lower the incidence of complications and stone recurrence rate,and exert a protective effect on biliary sphincter.
周继;刘辉;孙跃明
江阴市中医院普外科,江苏 江阴,214400江阴市中医院普外科,江苏 江阴,214400南京医科大学第一附属医院结直肠外科
医药卫生
胆总管结石病胆囊结石病胆总管探查术胆囊切除术,腹腔镜胰胆管造影术,内窥镜逆行
CholedocholithiasisCholecystolithiasisCommon bile duct explorationCholecystectomy,laparoscopicCholan-giopancreatography,endoscopic retrograde
《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2026 (9)
677-683,7
评论