3种膀胱引流策略对脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱的影响OA
Comparative Effects of Three Catheterization Strategies on Neurogenic Bladder after Spinal Cord Injury
目的 观察留置导尿持续开放、留置导尿间断夹闭及清洁间歇导尿对脊髓损伤(SCI)后神经源性膀胱(NB)患者的影响,为临床导尿决策提供循证依据.方法 选取2023年6月—2025年6月于空军军医大学第一附属医院康复医学科住院治疗的SCI后NB患者47例,采用随机数字表法分为留置导尿持续开放组16例、留置导尿间断夹闭组15例、清洁间歇导尿组16例.干预期间,留置导尿持续开放组1例、清洁间歇导尿组1例因提前出院退出研究,3组各15例纳入最终数据分析.3组均接受基础治疗,留置导尿持续开放组采用乳胶材质留置尿管持续开放引流;留置导尿间断夹闭组采用乳胶材质留置尿管,根据出入量调整夹闭时间;清洁间歇导尿组采用聚氨酯材质亲水涂层导尿管间歇导尿.分别于治疗前及治疗2周后采用神经源性膀胱症状评分(NBSS)评估患者相关NB症状,采用简易版NB患者生活质量测评量表(SF-Qualiveen)评估患者生活质量与治疗满意度,采用膀胱压力容量评定系统测量残余尿量及膀胱安全容量;分别于治疗前、治疗后1周、治疗后2周,以及治疗期间患者出现疑似尿路感染临床症状时采集尿液标本进行定量细菌培养与药敏试验.结果 与治疗前比较,治疗后清洁间歇导尿组NBSS明显升高(P<0.05),留置导尿持续开放组和间断夹闭组NBSS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后3组NBSS比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).与治疗前比较,治疗后留置导尿持续开放组SF-Qualiveen评分明显升高(P<0.05);治疗后留置导尿间断夹闭组和清洁间歇导尿组SF-Qualiveen评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).与留置导尿持续开放组比较,治疗后留置导尿间断夹闭组和清洁间歇导尿组SF-Qualiveen评分均较低(P<0.05).与治疗前比较,治疗后3组残余尿量及膀胱安全容量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后3组残余尿量及膀胱安全容量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗期间留置导尿持续开放组、留置导尿间断夹闭组及清洁间歇导尿组尿路感染发生率分别为20.00%(3/15)、33.33%(5/15)和33.33%(5/15),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在SCI后NB患者的短期住院管理中,留置导尿持续开放、间断夹闭和清洁间歇导尿在客观膀胱功能保护方面总体效果相当,但清洁间歇导尿可能加重症状,留置导尿持续开放可能对生活质量产生不利影响.
Objective To investigate the effects of indwelling catheterization with free drainage,intermittent urinary catheter clamping,and clean intermittent catheterization on patients with neurogenic bladder(NB)after spinal cord injury(SCI),so as to provie evidence-based support for clinical catheterization decision-making.Methods A total of 47 patients with NB after SCI who were hospitalized in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,from June 2023 to June 2025 were recruited.Patients were randomly assigned using a random number table into the indwelling catheteriza‐tion with free drainage group(n=16),the intermittent urinary catheter clamping group(n=15),and the clean intermittent catheteriza‐tion group(n=16).During the intervention period,one patient in the indwelling catheterization with free drainage group and one patient in the clean intermittent catheterization group withdrew due to early discharge,and 15 patients in each group were included in the final analysis.All groups received basic treatment.The indwelling catheterization with free drainage group used latex indwell‐ing catheters for continuous drainage;the intermittent urinary catheter clamping group used latex indwelling catheters with clamping intervals adjusted according to fluid intake and output;and the clean intermittent catheterization group used hydrophilic-coated poly‐urethane catheters for intermittent catheterization.Before treatment and after 2 weeks of intervention,the Neurogenic Bladder Symp‐tom Score(NBSS)was used to evaluate NB-related symptoms,the Short-Form Health Survey Qualiveen(SF-Qualiveen)scores was adopted to assess quality of life and treatment satisfaction,and a bladder pressure‑volume assessment system was applied to measure residual urine volume and bladder safe capacity.Urine specimens were collected before treatment,at 1 weeks and 2 weeks after treat‐ment,and when patients presented clinical symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection during the intervention for quantitative bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Results Compared with that before treatment,NBSS increased significantly in the clean intermittent catheterization group after treatment(P<0.05),whereas no significant differences were observed in the in‐dwelling catheterization with free drainage group or the intermittent urinary catheter clamping group(P>0.05).No significant differ‐ences were found in NBSS among the three groups after treatment(P>0.05).Compared with those before treatment,SF-Qualiveen scores increased significantly in the indwelling catheterization with free drainage group after treatment(P<0.05),whereas no signifi‐cant differences were observed in the intermittent urinary catheter clamping group or clean intermittent catheterization group(P>0.05).Compared with the indwelling catheterization with free drainage group,the SF-Qualiveen scores in both the intermittent urinaty catheter clamping group and the clean intermittent catheterization group were lower after treatment(P<0.05).No significant within-group differences were found in residual urine volume or bladder safe capacity in the three groups after treatment(P>0.05),and no inter-group differences were observed among the three groups after treatment(P>0.05).During treatment,the incidence of urinary tract infection was 20.00%(3/15),33.33%(5/15),and 33.33%(5/15)in the indwelling catheterization with free drainage group,in‐termittent urinary catheter clamping group,and clean intermittent catheterization group,respectively,with no significant difference among groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For short-term management of patients with NB after SCI,indwelling catheterization with free drainage,intermittent urinary catheter clamping,and clean intermittent catheterization showed comparable overall effects on ob‐jective bladder function protection.However,clean intermittent catheterization may exacerbate bladder-related symptoms,whereas indwelling catheterization with free drainage may negatively affect quality of life.
谢继强;刘新禹;田飞;杜霞;曹辉;袁华;刘慧琳
空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032||联勤保障部队第940医院,甘肃 兰州 730070空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032空军军医大学第一附属医院,陕西 西安 710032
脊髓损伤神经源性膀胱导尿膀胱功能尿路感染
spinal cord injuryneurogenic bladdercatheter drainagebladder functionurinary tract infection
《康复学报》 2026 (9)
646-653,8
国家自然科学基金项目(82472593)陕西省重点研发计划项目(2025SF-YBXM-189)西京医院医护人才培养助推项目(XJZT24LY11)
评论