首页|期刊导航|西部中医药|中西医治疗紧张性头痛临床研究的有效率定义及其判定标准差异:一项概况性评价

中西医治疗紧张性头痛临床研究的有效率定义及其判定标准差异:一项概况性评价OA

Definitions and Criteria for Effective Rate in Clinical Studies of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Tension-Type Headache:A Scoping Review

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨中西医治疗紧张性头痛研究中有效率这一复合结局指标的应用现状,为研究合理选择紧张性头痛复合结局指标提供参考.方法:计算机检索PubMed、EMBase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库发表的中西医治疗紧张性头痛临床研究文献,应用Excel 2016、CiteSpace 16.0、Cytoscape 3.7.2软件,对文献关键词、研究机构、疾病分型、疗程、有效率评价定义及疗效标准、疗效判定分级、指标使用频次与频率等进行描述性分析.结果:共纳入132篇文献,其中92篇明确表述了有效率的参考标准或自定义评判标准,引用文献说明最多(34篇);其次为不同版本《中药新药临床研究指导原则》(29篇).复合结局指标包含21项具体指标,指标组合方式共39种,排名前3的组合分别为视觉模拟量表、头痛发作频率与持续时间(7项),头痛程度/症状与复发(6项),以及头痛程度/症状、发作频率与持续时间(6项);据此形成了四级、三级乃至二级疗效评判标准.结论:中西医治疗紧张性头痛的有效率评定存在诸多问题,需对有效率这一复合结局指标进行规范以指导临床应用,从而提升相关临床研究的质量与价值.

Objective:To investigate the current application status of effective rate as a composite outcome measure in clinical studies of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for tension-type headache,and to provide a reference for the rational selection of composite outcome indicators in future tension-type headache research.Methods:Computer-based searches were conducted in PubMed,EMBase,Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database,and Wanfang Database to identify clinical studies on tension-type headache treated with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine.Descriptive analyses were performed using Excel 2016,CiteSpace 16.0,and Cytoscape 3.7.2 software,covering keywords,research institutions,disease classification,treatment course,definitions and criteria for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness,grading of efficacy assessment,and the frequency and utilization rates of outcome indicators.Results:A total of 132 studies were included,of which 92 explicitly stated the reference standards or self-defined criteria for effective rate.The most frequently cited reference was the literature source(34 studies),followed by different versions of the Guiding Principles for Clinical Research of New Chinese Medicines(29 studies).The composite outcome measures comprised 21 specific indicators,with a total of 39 combination patterns.The top three combinations were:Visual Analogue Scale,combined with headache attack frequency and duration(7 studies),headache severity/symptoms combined with recurrence(6 studies),and headache severity/symptoms combined with attack frequency and duration(6 studies).Accordingly,four-level,three-level,and even two-level grading systems for efficacy evaluation were established.Conclusion:There are numerous problems in the evaluation of effective rate in the treatment of tension-type headache with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine.It is necessary to standardize effective rate as a composite outcome measure to guide clinical application,thereby improving the quality and value of relevant clinical research.

刘娅;王君实;王海腾;王金贵;李华南;房纬

天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193天津中医药大学第一附属医院/中医国家临床医学研究中心/国家中医药管理局推拿手法生物效应三级实验室/天津市卫生健康委员会中医推拿研究所,天津 300193

医药卫生

紧张性头痛中西医结合疗法有效率复合结局指标概况性评价

tension-type headacheintegrated traditional Chinese and Western medicineeffective ratecomposite outcome measuresscoping review

《西部中医药》 2026 (10)

71-75,5

国家自然科学基金(81373761)国家中医药管理局中医药传承与创新"百千万"人才工程(岐黄工程)岐黄学者(国中医药人教函[2021]203号)国家中医药管理局推拿学高水平重点学科-推拿学(2024ZDK002)国家区域中医(推拿)诊疗中心项目(963042).

10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2026.10.13

评论