首页|期刊导航|重庆大学学报(社会科学版)|个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的法理基础与制度构造

个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的法理基础与制度构造OACHSSCD

Jurisprudential basis and institutional structure of punitive damages for personal information infringement

中文摘要英文摘要

基于数字社会背景下个人信息的私益和公益双重属性、个人信息侵权的新型特征、对个人信息权益进行周延保护的制度需求以及惩罚性赔偿的制度旨趣,应当通过引入个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的方式完善个人信息保护的制度体系.在理论层面,尽管学界既有研究表明,个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的制度建构对于完善个人信息保护制度体系具有理论上的必要性和正当性,但相关的理论建构或处于缺位状态,或存在进一步完善的空间.在规范层面,尽管《民法典》和《个人信息保护法》就个人信息保护进行了必要的规范体系建构,但惩罚性赔偿制度适用的法定主义和个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的规范缺失,导致司法实践中难以为信息主体提供周延的制度保障.面对个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿理论与规范样态之缺陷,应当结合惩罚性赔偿的功能主义价值取向和既有制度体系,择取个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿制度构造之路径,进行个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的制度构造,进而为引入个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿提供理论支撑.基于惩罚性赔偿制度与损害赔偿制度之间的同质性与异质性,在个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿主观要件上,应当在强调侵权行为人主观恶意程度的基础之上,择取侵权过错谱系内的"故意"和"重大过失"作为个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的主观要件.在客观损害层面,个人信息侵权行为除对信息主体造成严重的财产或精神损害外,对于"风险性损害"和"大规模微型侵权"等新型个人信息侵权损害形态,应当以个人信息处理者的法定义务为损害后果的认定标准.在此视域内,"风险性损害""大规模微型侵权"等个人信息侵权形态亦符合侵权行为和损害后果情节严重的评价标准.因此,应当将侵害个人信息造成严重后果和侵害个人信息情节严重均纳入个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿的客观要件之中.在请求权主体上,应当以既有惩罚性赔偿制度体系、规范体系和法律实践为基础,除个人信息主体可作为惩罚性赔偿的请求主体外,亦应当将个人信息公益诉讼主体纳入其中,在扩大个人信息主体救济渠道的同时,弥补个人信息主体诉讼能力不足的缺陷.

Based on the dual attributes of private and public interests of personal information in the context of digital society,the new features of personal information infringement,the systematic demand for extended protection of personal information rights and interests,as well as the systematic interest of punitive damages,the systematic system of personal information protection should be perfected through the introduction of the system of punitive damages for personal information infringement.At the theoretical level,although the existing research in the academic circle shows that the construction of the system of punitive damages for personal information infringement is theoretically necessary and justified for the improvement of the system of personal information protection,the relevant theoretical construction is either in a state of absence,or there is room for further improvement.At the level of legal norms,although the Civil Code and the Personal Information Protection Law have necessary norms on the protection of personal information,the legalism of the application of the punitive compensation system and the lack of norms on the punitive damages for personal information infringement have made it difficult to provide the information subject with a comprehensive system of protection in judicial practice.In the face of the defects in theory and normative patterns of punitive damages for personal information infringement,the functionalism value orientation of punitive damages and the existing system should be combined to choose the construction path,and thus provide theoretical support for the introduction of punitive damages for personal information infringement.Based on the homogeneity and heterogeneity between the punitive damages system and the damages system,in the subjective elements of punitive damages for personal information infringement,emphasizing the degree of subjective malice of the tortfeasor,intent and gross negligence within the spectrum of infringement fault should be selected as the subjective elements.For objective damage,in addition to the serious property or moral damage caused to the subject of information by the infringement of personal information,in the case of forms of damage such as risk-based damage and mass micro-aggression,the legal obligations of the processor of personal information should be the criterion for determining the consequences of damage.In this context,risk-based damage and mass micro-aggression are also in line with the evaluation criteria of the seriousness of the infringement and the consequences of the damage.Therefore,the serious consequences of the infringement of personal information and the seriousness of the infringement of personal information should be included in the objective elements of punitive damages for personal information infringement.For the subject of claim,based on the existing punitive damages system,norms and legal practice,personal information subject,as well as personal information public interest litigation subject should be the subject of punitive damages claim,to expand the relief channels and make up for the litigation capacity deficiencies of personal information subject.

谢潇;张玉海

重庆大学 法学院,重庆 400044重庆大学 法学院,重庆 400044

社会科学

数字社会个人信息侵权损害赔偿惩罚性赔偿预防功能

digital societypersonal informationtort damagespunitive damagespreventive function

《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (4)

225-238,14

国家社会科学基金青年项目"民法典编纂视野下的民法拟制条款研究"(19CFX057)教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目"法律行为的罗马私法基础研究"(22JHQ071)

10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.fx.2026.04.003

评论