中成药治疗功能性消化不良随机对照临床研究的证据图分析OA
Proprietary Chinese medicine for functional dyspepsia:a randomized controlled clinical literature research with figure-based evidence analysis
目的:系统收集、分析和评价中成药治疗功能性消化不良的随机对照试验研究文献,总结临床证据,为合理用药、优化治疗及后续研究提供参考.方法:检索2020 年 1 月-2025 年 4 月中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase 数据库中收录的中成药治疗功能性消化不良的文献,对其进行统计分析,以图文结合的方式展示临床研究证据分布及证据质量.结果:最终纳入中成药治疗功能性消化不良随机对照试验文献169篇(中文文献166篇,英文文献3篇),涉及中成药55种,样本量以<100例最多,绝大多数研究的疗程集中在14~30 d,干预/对照措施以中成药+西药 vs.西药为主.共应用结局指标100 个,各项结局指标共计使用903 次.CONSORT 声明(2025)分析中,42个条目中仅有7个条目为完全报告,且有6个条目为均未报告;方法学质量整体不高,仅9篇文献提及双盲、安慰剂、模拟剂,3 篇文献在中国临床试验注册中心注册.结论:中成药在临床功能性消化不良治疗中应用广泛,具有一定的疗效,目前已开展的研究多为单中心、小样本的临床研究,且在试验注册、样本量估算、分配隐藏等方法学质量方面普遍存在不足,今后应开展大样本、多中心、高质量的临床研究,为中成药治疗功能性消化不良提供可靠的循证医学证据.
Objective:To systematically collect,analyze and evaluate the literature of randomized controlled trials(RCTS)of Proprietary Chinese medicines in the treatment of functional dyspepsia(FD),and summarize the clinical evidence.The aim is to provide references for rational drug use,optimize treatment strategies and inform subsequent research.Methods:Eight Chinese and English databases(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,VIP Network,China Biomedical Literature Database,PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Embase Database)from January 2020 to April 2025 were retrieved.The literature on the treatment of FD with Proprietary Chinese medicines included in the databases was statistically analyzed,and the distribution and quality of clinical research evidence were presented through a combination of text and images.Results:A total of 169 RCT studies(166 in Chinese and 3 in English)on the treatment of FD with Proprietary Chinese medicines were finally included,involving 55 kinds of Proprietary Chinese medicines.The sample size was the largest with less than 100 cases,and the treatment courses of the vast majority of studies were concentrated in 14-30 days.The intervention/control measures were mainly proprietary Chinese medicines combined with Western medicines vs.Western medicine alone.A total of 100 outcome measures were applied,with a cumulative usage frequency of 903 times.In the CONSORT declaration(2025)analysis,among the 42 entries,only 7 entries were fully reported,and 6 entries were not reported at all.The overall methodological quality was not high:Only 9 studies mentioned double-blinding,placebo,and simulants,and 3 studies were registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.Conclusion:Proprietary Chinese medicines are widely used in the clinical treatment of FD and demonstrated certain therapeutic effects.However,most existing studies are single-center,small-sample clinical trials,with general methodological limitations in areas such as trial registration,sample size estimation,and allocation concealment.In the future,large-sample,multicenter,and high-quality clinical studies should be conducted to provide reliable evidence for the use of Proprietary Chinese medicines in the treatment of FD.
唐湘;闫幸;杨应芩;王晶;冀建斌;王红霞;王威
天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381天津中医药大学循证医学中心,天津,301617天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津,300381||国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,天津,300381
医药卫生
功能性消化不良中成药随机对照研究证据图方法学质量评价
Functional dyspepsiaProprietary Chinese medicineRandomized controlled trialEvidence diagramMethodological quality evaluation
《中医临床研究》 2026 (17)
76-88,13
天津市卫生健康委员会中医中西医结合科研课题(2023133).
评论