首页|期刊导航|浙江医学|急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层撕裂进入肠系膜上动脉时的治疗策略及疗效研究

急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层撕裂进入肠系膜上动脉时的治疗策略及疗效研究OA

Treatment strategy and efficacy analysis of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection involving superior mesenteric artery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 基于急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层撕裂进入肠系膜上动脉(SMA)时形态学改变的特征,探讨其治疗策略选择并进行疗效分析.方法 回顾性收集2020年1月至2024年12月浙江省台州医院血管外科收治的急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层撕裂进入SMA并行胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的患者31例,结合Nagamine分型,根据患者SMA的形态学特点分为真假腔沟通组5例、真腔通畅组18例、真腔塌陷组8例,比较3组患者TEVAR术前和术后6个月SMA相关形态学参数的变化情况,探讨治疗策略选择,结合围手术期及随访结果分析疗效.结果 真腔塌陷组患者腹痛发生率高于真假腔沟通组和真腔通畅组(均P<0.05),同时急诊手术、SMA重建发生率亦均高于真假腔沟通组和真腔通畅组(均P<0.05).3组患者技术成功率均为100.0%.与术前比较,TEVAR术后6个月真假腔沟通组SMA水平主动脉真腔面积(SAATL)增大(P<0.05);真腔通畅组SAATL、主动脉真腔面积占比、SMA真腔最小直径均增加(均P<0.05),而SMA起始部假腔面积(SSMAFL)、真腔最狭窄率均减小(均P<0.05);真腔塌陷组主动脉真腔面积占比、SMA真腔最小直径等均增加(均P<0.05),而SSMAFL、真腔最狭窄率等均减小(均P<0.05).随访结果显示,3组患者均无因SMA夹层导致肠缺血而再干预者.结论 TEVAR或TEVAR联合SMA腔内重建可作为急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层撕裂进入SMA时的治疗策略选择,疗效良好.对于SMA夹层真腔闭塞或重度狭窄者多数需要急诊TEVAR联合SMA支架植入术以改善肠组织血供.

Objective To investigate treatment strategies and analyze clinical outcomes based on the characteristics of morphological changes of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection extending into the superior mesenteric artery(SMA).Methods A total of 31 patients with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection extending into the SMA who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)in the Department of Vascular Surgery,Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province between January 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled.According to the Nagamine classification and morphological features of the SMA,patients were divided into three groups:true-false lumen communication group(5 cases),patent true lumen group(18 cases),and collapsed true lumen group(8 cases).Changes in SMA-related morphological parameters before TEVAR and at 6 months after the procedure were compared among the three groups.Treatment strategies were explored,and efficacy was analyzed based on perioperative and follow-up outcomes.Results The incidence of abdominal pain in the collapsed true lumen group was significantly higher than that in the true-false lumen communication group and patent true lumen group(all P<0.05).Meanwhile,the rates of emergency surgery and SMA reconstruction in the collapsed true lumen group were also higher than those of the true-false lumen communication group and patent true lumen group(all P<0.05).The technical success rate reached 100.0%in all three groups.Compared with baseline,true lumen area of aorta at SMA level(SAATL)increased in the true-false lumen communication group 6 months after TEVAR(P<0.05);in the patent true lumen group,SAATL,the proportion of aortic true lumen area,and the minimum SMA true lumen diameter all increased(all P<0.05),whereas false lumen area at the origin of SMA(SSMAFL)and the true lumen stenosis rate both decreased(both P<0.05);in the collapsed true lumen group,the proportion of aortic true lumen area and minimum SMA true lumen diameter increased(all P<0.05),whereas SSMAFL and true lumen stenosis rate decreased(all P<0.05).No reintervention related to intestinal ischemia secondary to SMA dissection was observed during follow-up in all three groups.Conclusion TEVAR or TEVAR combined with endovascular SMA reconstruction is an effective therapeutic option for acute Stanford type B aortic dissection extending into the SMA.For patients with occluded or severely stenosed SMA true lumen caused by dissection,emergency TEVAR combined with SMA stenting is mostly required to improve intestinal blood supply.

胡斌;褚海伟;赵文军;陈光;李栋林

317000 浙江省台州医院血管外科317000 浙江省台州医院血管外科317000 浙江省台州医院血管外科317000 浙江省台州医院血管外科浙江大学医学院附属第一医院血管外科

Stanford B型主动脉夹层肠系膜上动脉形态学治疗策略疗效

Stanford type B aortic dissectionSuperior mesenteric arteryMorphologyTreatment strategyTherapeutic effect

《浙江医学》 2026 (17)

1818-1824,1831,8

浙江省基础公益计划研究项目(LGF20H020007)

10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2026.48.17.2025-1777

评论