脉冲电磁场对原发性骨质疏松症患者疼痛和骨密度的影响:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析OA
Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy on pain and bone mineral density in patients with primary osteoporosis:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
目的 评估脉冲电磁场(pulsed electromagnetic fields,PEMFs)治疗原发性骨质疏松症(osteopo-rosis,OP)的疗效,为其临床应用提供科学依据.方法 系统检索建库至 2025 年 4 月 11 日的 MEDLINE、EM-BASE、中国知网等中英文数据库,纳入符合标准的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCTs).通过物理治疗证据数据库(physiotherapy evidence database,PEDro)量表(≥6分)评估文献质量,提取腰椎/股骨颈/全髋骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)及疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)数据,采用RevMan 5.3进行 Meta 分析.结果 共纳入 29 项 RCTs.Meta 分析显示,PEMFs 组腰椎 BMD[标准化均数差(standardized mean difference,SMD)=0.49,95%CI:0.29~0.69,P<0.000 01]与全髋 BMD(SMD=1.30,95%CI:0.03~2.57,P=0.04)较对照组(安慰剂或其他疗法)显著提高,且随访期间效果持续.治疗后PEMFs组股骨颈 BMD 较对照组差异无统计学意义(SMD=0.06,95%CI:-0.07~0.20,P=0.35),但随访期间(3~9个月)差异有统计学意义(SMD=0.91,95%CI:0.23~1.60,P=0.009).PEMFs 显著降低 VAS 评分[1周~20周;均数差(mean difference,MD)=-1.64,95%CI:-2.00~-1.27,P<0.000 01],亚组分析显示各时间点疼痛均缓解.敏感性分析证实结果稳健,仅治疗1个月后的 VAS 评分存在潜在发表偏倚,其余指标无显著偏倚.结论 PEMFs 可有效改善原发性 OP 患者的腰椎与全髋 BMD 并缓解疼痛,但对股骨颈 BMD 无显著作用.其疗效随治疗时间延长持续显现,为临床非药物治疗提供了可靠证据.未来需规范 PEMFs 参数设置并扩大高质量 RCT 以验证长期效果.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields(PEMFs)on primary osteopo-rosis(OP)and provide scientific evidence for clinical application.Methods A systematic search of Chinese and English databases such as MEDLINE,EMBASE,CNKI was conducted from inception to April 11,2025.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)meeting predefined criteria were included.Literature quality was assessed using the physiotherapy evidence database(PEDro)scale(score≥6).Bone mineral density(BMD)at lumbar spine,femoral neck and total hip and visual analogue scale(VAS)pain scores were extracted.Meta-analysis was performed using Rev-Man 5.3 software.Results Twenty-nine RCTs were included.Meta-analysis revealed that PEMFs significantly improved lumbar spine BMD(SMD=0.49,95%CI:0.29-0.69,P<0.000 01)and total hip BMD(SMD=1.30,95%CI:0.03-2.57,P=0.04)compared to the controls(placebo or other therapies),with sustained effects during follow-up.No significant difference in BMD at femoral neck was observed immediately post-treatment(SMD=0.06,95%CI:-0.07-0.20,P=0.35),but a significant improvement emerged during the follow-up(3-6 months:SMD=0.91,95%CI:0.23-1.60,P=0.009).PEMFs significantly reduced VAS scores(1-20 weeks:MD=-1.64,95%CI:-2.00--1.27,P<0.000 01),with subgroup analysis demonstrating pain relief at all time points.The results were robust confirmed by sensitivity analysis,though potential publication bias was detected for 1-month post-treatment VAS scores.Other outcomes showed no significant bias.Conclusion PEMFs can effectively enhance lumbar spine and total hip BMD while alleviating pain in primary OP patients,though no immediate benefit is observed for femoral neck BMD.Ther-apeutic effects persisted over time,providing reliable evidence for non-pharmacological clinical management.Future stud-ies should standardize PEMFs parameters and carry out high-quality RCTs to validate long-term efficacy.
杨建成;冯燕;潘明明;车茂红;师杰;商澎;曾玉红
710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科518057 广东深圳,西北工业大学深圳研究院||710072 西安,西北工业大学生命学院710054 西安,西安交通大学附属西安市红会医院骨质疏松科
医药卫生
骨质疏松脉冲电磁场疼痛骨密度视觉模拟评分法
osteoporosispulsed electromagnetic fieldspainbone mineral densityvisual analogue scale
《中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志》 2026 (4)
490-503,14
国家自然科学基金(52037007)陕西省重点研发计划项目(2023-YBSF-360)西安市科技计划项目(22YXYJ0022)
评论