首页|期刊导航|中国中医骨伤科杂志|真实世界的复方南星止痛膏治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的用药规律研究

真实世界的复方南星止痛膏治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的用药规律研究OA

Real-World Study of Medication Use Patterns of Compound Nanxing Zhitong Plaster for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨真实世界复方南星止痛膏治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛人群的临床特征及用药规律,为临床慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛治疗合理用药提供客观依据.方法:采用多中心、前瞻性真实世界研究方法,于2021年11月至2022年12月在全国38家中西医院共收集1 921例采用复方南星治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者,将纳入的用药时间、用药频率、总用药量、疼痛部位以及联合用药资料(药物名称及类别)进行描述性分析,对单独使用复方南星止痛膏组(单用组)与治疗期间存在其他非复方南星药物的联合处方组(联用组)进行比较,利用Apriori算法对联合用药情况进行关联性分析,对复方南星止痛膏的用药规律进行研究.结果:入组1 921例患者中,单用组共1 625例(84.6%),联用组共296例(15.4%).患者特征方面,单用组患者的平均年龄为(52.04±15.74)岁,体重指数为(23.45±2.86)kg/m2,均高于联用组平均年龄(51.16±15.19)岁及平均体重指数(23.29±3.13)kg/m2,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);单用组男女比例为0.61∶1.00,联用组为0.60∶1.00,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).组间分析比较显示,治疗前单用组VAS评分(5.87±1.10)分与联用组(5.81±1.01)分间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而SF-12评分(单用组(30.36±2.30)分,联用组(30.76±2.41)分)、GPS评分(单用组(83.42±34.73)分,联用组(73.85±31.05)分)及中医证候/症状量表总分(单用组(10.82±2.50)分,联用组(11.00±2.40)分)方面,联用组与单用组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步分析具体中医证候/症状发现,两组在患处恶风畏寒、关节活动不利及疼痛部位僵硬等条目上差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05).临床用药结果显示,使用复方南星止痛膏的患者中,首次贴敷频率1次/d最多(80.4%);治疗疗程小于4周的患者占比最多,共1 349例(70.3%);其次为用药周期在8~12周的患者,共314例(16.4%);疗程大于12周的患者数量最少,共22例(1.1%).联合用药频次方面,总体来看,联合用药排名前3位的药物为盐酸氨基葡萄糖(93次,18.20%)、洛芬待因(67次,13.11%)、美洛昔康(32次,6.26%);疼痛部位上,颈肩部位、腰背部位和四肢部位联合药物排名第1的药物分别为酮洛芬凝胶(10次,18.18%)、美洛昔康(20次,21.98%)和盐酸氨基葡萄糖(82次,49.10%).联合用药关联度方面,全部患者中前3位的药物组合分别为"洛芬待因+盐酸氨基葡萄糖""醋氯芬酸+盐酸氨基葡萄糖""甲钴胺+酮洛芬凝胶";颈肩部位、腰背部位和四肢部位排名第1位的药物组合分别为"酮洛芬凝胶+盐酸乙哌立松""酮洛芬凝胶+甲钴胺"和"洛芬待因+盐酸氨基葡萄糖".结论:真实世界中使用复方南星止痛膏治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者女性多于男性,临床多用于VAS评分为5~6分的患者,单独用药比例达到80%.联合用药以"洛芬待因+盐酸氨基葡萄糖"为主.不同疼痛部位的高频药物组合存在明显不同,这提示临床应根据疼痛部位制定个体化联合用药方案,为优化复方南星止痛膏的临床应用方案提供了循证依据.

Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics and medication patterns of patients with chronic musculo-skeletal pain treated with Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster in a real-world setting objective evidence for rational drug use in clinical management of chronic musculoskeletal pain.Methods:A multicenter,prospective real-world study was con-ducted across 38 Chinese and Western medicine hospitals nationwide from November 2021 to December 2022,enrolling 1 921 patients treated with Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster for chronic musculoskeletal pain.Descriptive analyses were performed on the duration of use,frequency of use,total dosage,pain location,and concomitant medication data.Compari-sons were made between the Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster monotherapy group and the combination therapy group(Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs).Concomitant medication patterns were analyzed for associations using the Apriori algorithm.Results:Among 1 921 enrolled patients,1 625(84.6%)were in the monotherapy group and 296(15.4%)in the combination therapy group.Patient characteristics showed that the mean age in the monotherapy group was(52.04±15.74)years old and BMI was(23.45±2.86)kg/m2,both significantly higher than the mean age(51.16±15.19)years old and mean BMI(23.29±3.13)kg/m2 in the combination therapy group(P<0.05).The male-to-female ratio was 0.61∶1.00 in the monotherapy group and 0.60∶1.00 in the combination therapy group(P>0.05).Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in pre-treatment VAS scores between the monotherapy group(5.87±1.10)points and combination therapy group(5.81±1.01)points(P>0.05).However,significant differences were observed in SF-12 scores(monotherapy group(30.36±2.30)points,combination therapy group(30.76±2.41)points),GPS scores(monotherapy group(83.42±34.73)points,combination therapy group(73.85±31.05)points),and total traditional Chinese medicine syndrome/symptom scale scores(monotherapy group(10.82±2.50)points,combination therapy group(11.00±2.40)points)showed significant differences between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group(P<0.05).Further analysis of specific TCM syndromes/symp-toms revealed significant differences between groups in items such as aversion to wind and cold at the affected site,re-stricted joint mobility,and stiffness at the painful area(P<0.05).Clinical medication results showed that among patients using the Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster,the most common initial application frequency was once daily(80.4%);the largest proportion of patients(1 349 cases,70.3%)had treatment courses shorter than 4 weeks;followed by 314 patients(16.4%)with treatment cycles between 8 and 12 weeks;while the smallest group had treatment courses exceeding 12 weeks,totaling 22 cases(1.1%).Regarding combined medication frequency,the drugs overall were glucosamine hydro-chloride(93 instances,18.20%),lbuprofen and codeine(67 instances,13.11%),and meloxicam(32 instances,6.26%).For pain locations,the top combination drugs for the neck/shoulder region,lumbar/back region,and extremities were ke-toprofen gel(10 instances,18.18%),meloxicam(20 instances,21.98%),and glucosamine hydrochloride(82 instances,49.10%),respectively.Regarding combination drug associations,the top three drug combinations in the overall population were"Lbuprofen and Codeine+Glucosamine Hydrochloride","Aceclofenac+Glucosamine Hydrochloride",and"Methyl-cobalamin+Ketoprofen Gel".The top combinations for the neck/shoulder region,lumbar/back region,and extremities were"Ketoprofen gel+Eperisone Hydrochloride","Ketoprofen gel+methylcobalamin",and"Lbuprofen and Codeine+glucosamine hydrochloride",respectively.Conclusion:In real-world settings,Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster is clinically applied primarily to patients with VAS scores of 5-6 points,with monotherapy accounting for 80%of cases.Combination ther-apy predominantly features"Lofendine+Glucosamine Hydrochloride".Optimal drug combinations vary significantly across different pain locations,suggesting that individualized combination therapy should be tailored to the specific pain site.This provides evidence-based support for optimizing the clinical application of Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster.

马新豫;康鹏德;黄泽宇;郑玮;杨永奇;何利雷;周晓庆;张宝庆;杨政博;宓保宏;陈月峰;马玉峰;陈卫衡;梁志;史宇航;王宇坤;杨国智;白金山;王雪惠;吴卓耘

北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所四川大学华西医院四川大学华西医院邯郸市中医院新乡市中医院佛山市中医院宝鸡市高新医院陕西省中医院沈阳市骨科医院北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所

医药卫生

复方南星止痛膏慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛真实世界研究用药规律联合用药

Compound Nanxing Zhitong plasterchronic musculoskeletal painreal-world studymedication use patternsdrug combination

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 2026 (9)

67-74,8

首都卫生发展科研专项(首发2022-1-7032)中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2026-JYB-KYPT-07)

10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.260910

评论