首页|期刊导航|中国中医骨伤科杂志|真实世界复方南星止痛膏治疗肢体部位慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的临床疗效分析

真实世界复方南星止痛膏治疗肢体部位慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的临床疗效分析OA

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Compound Nanxing Zhitong Plaster in Treating Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Limb Areas in the Real World

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨真实世界复方南星止痛膏治疗肢体部位慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的临床疗效,为复方南星止痛膏的合理用药提供依据.方法:2021年11月至2022年12月,采用多中心、前瞻性真实世界研究方法,在全国38家中西医院共收集3 029例慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者,纳入肢体部位慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者1 091例,其中单用复方南星止痛膏者666例,单用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)者425例,将性别、年龄、体重指数进行描述性统计.采用1∶1倾向性评分匹配(卡钳值为0.05)共获得760例患者,匹配后将单用复方南星止痛膏设为试验组(3 80例),将单用非甾体抗炎药类药物设为对照组(380例).采用主要结局指标视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、次要结局指标整体疼痛量表(GPS)、健康调查简表(SF-12)、中医证候/症状量表评分等进行统计分析,随访节点为治疗后第2,4,8,12周.采用SPSS 27.0进行数据统计分析,正态分布数据采用独立样本t检验,非正态分布数据采用Mann-Whitney U检验.结果:全数据集中试验组患者平均年龄(55.94±14.50)岁高于对照组(51.43±15.02)岁,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).试验组VAS评分(5.74±0.95)分高于对照组(5.60±0.93)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).倾向性匹配后结果显示,试验组在第2,4,8周时VAS评分下降均值分别为(1.67±1.13)分、(2.84±1.31)分、(3.80±1.44)分,低于对照组(2.09±1.26)分、(3.29±1.41)分、(4.12±1.32)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),第12周时试验组VAS评分下降(4.72±1.52)分,与对照组下降(4.76±1.34)分相比,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).整体疼痛量表评分方面,第2周时试验组60.00(36.00,84.00)分与对照组59.00(38.75,78.00)分相比,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第12周时试验组整体疼痛量表评分为5.00(0.00,16.00)分,低于对照组6.00(0.00,22.00)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).健康调查简表中生理维度评分试验组在第2周时(48.79±8.14)分低于对照组第2周时(50.11±9.11)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);第12周时试验组生理维度评分(53.14±8.31)分与对照组(53.08±8.49)分相比,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).健康调查简表中心理维度评分试验组在第2周时(57.34±7.71)分高于对照组第2周时(56.25±7.00)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);第12周时试验组(60.16±7.97)分与对照组(59.29±7.44)分相比,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).中医证候/症状量表总分方面,在第2周时试验组11.00(8.00,13.00)分与对照组10.00(9.00,13.00)分相比,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第12周时试验组3.00(2.00,7.00)分较对照组5.00(2.00,7.00)分更优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).中医证候/症状量表中患处恶风畏寒改善评分方面,试验组在第2,4,8,12周改善均值分别为(1.03±1.30)分、(1.32±1.55)分、(1.78±1.44)分、(2.13±1.42)分,优于对照组(0.82±1.18)分、(1.02±1.49)分、(1.54±1.50)分、(1.76±1.59)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).中医证候/症状量表中患处关节活动不利改善评分方面,第2,4,12周时两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在第8周时,试验组关节活动不利改善均值为(1.24±0.79)分,优于对照组(1.12±0.66)分.中医证候/症状量表中患处僵硬改善评分方面,试验组第2,4,8,12周改善均值分别为(0.55±0.67)分、(0.92±0.68)分、(1.07±0.68)分、(1.15±0.62)分,优于对照组(0.42±0.60)分、(0.73±0.67)分、(0.89±0.72)分、(1.03±0.64)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:单用复方南星止痛膏与单用非甾体抗炎药类药物治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛肢体疼痛,在短时间内(第2,4,8周时)均有较显著的功效,且单用复方南星止痛膏在长时间药效(第12周时)镇痛效果与单用非甾体抗炎药类药物相当;复方南星止痛膏在整体疼痛量表和中医证候/症状方面与单用非甾体抗炎药类药物相比改善显著,尤其在改善患处局部寒证所带来的患处恶风畏寒、患处僵硬方面有明显的优势.

Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster in treating chronic musculo-skeletal pain in limb areas in the real world,and to provide a clinical reference for its standardized and rational application.Methods:A multicenter,prospective real-world study was conducted from November 2021 to December 2022 in 38 Chinese and Western hospitals across the country.A total of 3 029 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain were collected,and 1 091 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in limb areas were included.Among them,666 patients used Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster alone,and 425 patients used NSAIDs alone.Descriptive statistics were conducted on gender,age,and BMI.A 1∶1 propensity score matching(Caliper=0.05)was performed,and 380 patients using Com-pound Nanxing Zhitong plaster alone were assigned to the experimental group,and 380 patients using NSAIDs alone were assigned to the control group.The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale(VAS),and the secondary out-come measures were the global pain scale(GPS),the short form health survey(SF-12),and the traditional Chinese medi-cine(TCM)syndrome/symptom scale scores.Statistical analysis was conducted at 2,4,8,and 12 weeks after treat-ment.Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0.Independent sample t-tests were used for normally distributed data,and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for non-normally distributed data.Results:In the full dataset before matching,the aver-age age of the experimental group(55.94±14.50)years old was higher than that of the control group(51.43±15.02)years old(P<0.05);baseline VAS score of experimental group(5.74±0.95)points was higher than control group(5.60±0.93)points(P<0.05).After propensity score matching,all baseline indicators were balanced between two groups(P>0.05).At 2,4,and 8 weeks,the mean decrease in VAS scores in the experimental group was(1.67±1.13),(2.84±1.31),and(3.80±1.44)points,respectively,which was lower than that in the control group(2.09±1.26),(3.29±1.41),and(4.12±1.32)points(all P<0.05).At 12 weeks,the VAS scores reduction of experimental group(4.72±1.52)points showed no significant difference with control group(4.76±1.34)points(P>0.05).For GPS score,there was no intergroup difference at week 2(P>0.05);at week 12,GPS score of experimental group 5.00(0.00,16.00)points was lower than control group 6.00(0.00,22.00)points(P<0.05).In SF-12 PCS(physical component summary),experimental group score at week 2(48.79±8.14)points was lower than control group(50.11±9.11)points(P<0.05),while no difference was found at week 12(P>0.05).In MCS(mental component summary),experi-mental group score at week 2(57.34±7.71)points was higher than control group(56.25±7.00)points(P<0.05),with no difference at week 12(P>0.05).Total TCM syndrome score showed no difference at week 2(P>0.05);at week 12,experimental group 3.00(2.00,7.00)points was superior to control group 5.00(2.00,7.00)points(P<0.05).The improvement of aversion to wind and cold,local stiffness at all follow-up time points(week 2/4/8/12)in ex-perimental group were significantly better than control group(P<0.05).The improvement of joint movement limitation was only superior in experimental group at week 8(P<0.05),with no difference at week 2,4,12(P>0.05).Conclusion:The single use of Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster and the single use of NSAIDs drugs both have significant efficacy in treating chronic musculoskeletal pain in the limbs over short-term period of 2,4,and 8 weeks.Moreover,the analgesic effect of Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster is comparable to NSAIDs at 12 weeks long-term follow-up.Compound Nanxing Zhitong plaster shows significant improvement in overall pain(GPS)and TCM cold syndrome symptoms compared with oral NSAIDs,especially for local aversion to wind and cold and stiffness caused by cold pathogen.

王宇坤;康鹏德;黄泽宇;郑玮;杨永奇;何利雷;周晓庆;张宝庆;杨政博;陈月峰;宓保宏;马玉峰;陈卫衡;梁志;王雪惠;马新豫;白金山;杨国智;史宇航;吴卓耘

北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所四川大学华西医院四川大学华西医院邯郸市中医院新乡市中医院佛山市中医院宝鸡市高新医院陕西省中医院沈阳市骨科医院北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所北京中医药大学第三附属医院(北京,100029)||中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心||北京中医药大学骨伤科研究所

医药卫生

复方南星止痛膏肢体部位慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛真实世界研究临床疗效分析

Compound Nanxing Zhitong plasterlimb partschronic musculoskeletal painreal-world studyclinical efficacy analysis

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 2026 (9)

58-66,9

首都卫生发展科研专项(首发2022-1-7032)中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2026-JYB-KYPT-07)

10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.260909

评论