首页|期刊导航|中国中医骨伤科杂志|单髁置换术中不同股骨定位对术后假体力线及膝关节功能的影响

单髁置换术中不同股骨定位对术后假体力线及膝关节功能的影响OA

The Influence of Different Femoral Positioning on the Mechanical Axis of the Prosthesis and Knee Joint Function after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨膝骨关节炎患者单髁置换术(UKA)中机械对线(MA)与运动学对线(KA)对假体力线及膝关节功能的影响.方法:选择151例2021年1月至2024年1月行单侧单髁膝关节置换术的膝骨关节炎患者,按照手术方法不同分为机械对线组(n=77)和运动学对线组(n=74).为了平衡两组之间的潜在差异,采用倾向性评分匹配法,按照1∶1进行匹配,最终使得机械对线组和运动学对线组各包含68例.比较两组患者术中指标,采用重复方差分析两组患者手术前后下肢力线.比较两组患者手术前后膝关节功能,通过广义相加模型(GAM)分析下肢力线指标与膝关节功能评分的相关性.采用二元Log-binomial回归分析两组患者不良反应发生率.结果:机械对线组患者术后引流量、切口总长度、住院时间分别为(89.45±13.11)mL、(9.19±1.11)cm、(5.39±1.32)d均高于运动学对线组的(80.37±13.92)mL、(8.09±0.98)cm、(4.37±1.01)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).重复方差分析结果显示,髋-膝-踝角、股骨假体角、胫骨假体角、膝关节功能评分、膝关节稳定性、膝关节本体感觉的时间和组别的主效应及时间×组别的交互效应差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).膝关节功能评分结果显示,术后6个月机械对线组HSS评分、KSS关节评分、KSS功能评分、Lysholm评分分别为(82.13±17.44)分、(78.96±20.88)分、(82.19±20.88)分、(70.32±14.01)分,均低于运动学对线组的(88.46±18.01)分、(87.45±25.28)分、(90.59±22.32)分、(76.43±15.02)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).膝关节稳定性结果显示,术后6个月机械对线组患者步速、步幅分别为(0.70±0.16)m/s、(1.05±0.20)m,均低于运动学对线组的(0.81±0.20)m/s、(1.19±0.22)m,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).膝关节本体感觉结果显示,术后6个月30°/45°/60°机械对线组角度差值分别为3.52°±0.41°,2.76°±0.39°,3.09°±0.28°,均高于运动学对线组的3.15°±0.46°,2.31°±0.46°,2.64°±0.53°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).广义相加模型结果显示,髋-膝-踝角、股骨假体角、胫骨假体角与HSS评分、KSS关节评分、KSS功能评分和Lysholm评分存在直线关联关系.Log-binomial回归结果显示,运动学对线组发生术后并发症的风险与机械对线组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:单髁膝关节置换术经机械对线和运动学对线指导均能改善膝骨关节炎患者术后膝关节功能、恢复膝关节稳定,但运动学对线组对患者膝关节改善效果更优.

Objective:To explore the effects of mechanical alignment(MA)and kinematic alignment(KA)on femoral prosthesis mechanical axis and knee joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA)undergoing unicompartmen-tal knee arthroplasty(UKA).Methods:A total of 151 patients with KOA who underwent unilateral UKA from January 2021 to January 2024 were selected and divided into the MA group(n=77)and the KA group(n=74)accord-ing to surgical technique.To balance the potential differences between the two groups,propensity score matching was used to match them at a ratio of 1∶1,resulting in 68 cases in each group.Intraoperative indicators of the two groups were compared.Repeated variance analysis was used to compare the lower limb mechanical axis before and after surgery in the two groups.Knee joint function before and after surgery in the two groups was compared.The correlation between lower limb mechanical axis indicators and knee joint function scores was analyzed by generalized additive model(GAM).Binary Log-binomial regression was used to analyze the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups.Results:The postopera-tive drainage volume,total incision length,and length of hospital stay in the MA group were(89.45±13.11)mL,(9.19±1.11)cm,and(5.39±1.32)d,respectively,all higher than those in the KA group(80.37±13.92)mL,(8.09±0.98)cm,and(4.37±1.01)d,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The results of repeated measures ANOVA showed that the main effects of time and group,as well as the time × group interaction effect,were statistically significant for the hip-knee-ankle angle,femoral prosthesis angle,tibial prosthesis angle,knee joint function score,knee joint stability,and knee joint proprioception(P<0.05).The knee joint function score results showed that the HSS score,KSS joint score,KSS function score,and Lysholm score of the MA group at 6 months after surgery were(82.13±17.44),(78.96±20.88),(82.19±20.88),and(70.32±14.01)points,respectively-significantly lower than those of the KA group((88.46±18.01),(87.45±25.28),(90.59±22.32),and(76.43±15.02)points)(P<0.05).The results of knee joint stability showed that at 6 months after surgery,the walking speed and stride of patients in the MA group were(0.70±0.16)m/s and(1.05±0.20)m,respectively-both significantly lower than those in the KA group(0.81±0.20)m/s and(1.19±0.22)m,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The knee joint proprioception results showed that the 30°/45°/60° in the MA group at 6 months after surgery were 3.52°±0.41°,2.76°±0.39°,and 3.09°±0.28°,respectively,which were higher than those in the KA group(3.15°±0.46°,2.31°±0.46°,and 2.64°±0.53°),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).GAM results showed that the hip-knee-ankle angle,femoral prosthesis angle,and tibial prosthesis angle were linearly related to the HSS score,KSS joint score,KSS function score,and Lysholm score.Log-binomial regression showed no statistically significant difference in the risk of postoperative complications between the KA group and the MA group(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both MA and KA guidance in UK A can improve knee joint function and stability in KO A patients after surgery,but the KA group has a better improvement effect on knee joint function.

王胜勇;龚华惠;印红兵;戴瑜

泰州市中医院(江苏 泰州,225300)泰州市中医院(江苏 泰州,225300)泰州市中医院(江苏 泰州,225300)泰州市中医院(江苏 泰州,225300)

医药卫生

机械对线运动学对线股骨假体力线单髁置换术膝关节

mechanical alignmentkinematic alignmentfemoral prosthesis mechanical axisunicompartmental knee arthroplastyknee joint

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 2026 (9)

39-48,10

泰州市科技支撑计划(社会发展)项目(TSL202508)

10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.260907

评论