首页|期刊导航|中国中医骨伤科杂志|杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察

杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察OA

Observation of the Therapeutic Effect of Yang Tianpeng's Manipulation Combined with Circular Needle Knife on Knee Osteoarthritis Based on the Theory of Equal Emphasis on Muscles and Bones

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨基于"筋骨并重"理论的杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效.方法:选取2023年11月至2025年5月收治的98例膝骨关节炎患者,采用随机数字表法分为针刀组与联用手法组.采用单盲法,针刀组采用自主研发的圆针刀治疗,联用手法组在圆针刀治疗基础上联合杨天鹏手法干预,两组均干预4周.比较两组患者干预前和干预1,2,4周后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,干预前后中医证候评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、第2简化版关节炎生存质量测量量表(AIMS2-SF)评分、炎性因子(C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6))水平及临床疗效,并监测不良反应发生情况.结果:疼痛方面,治疗1,2,4周后联用手法组VAS评分均低于针刀组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);中医证候评分联用手法组疼痛、僵硬、肿胀、活动受限、腰膝酸软5项评分均低于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);关节功能、生存质量和炎性因子水平方面,联用手法组WOMAC评分和CRP、IL-6水平均低于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),AIMS2-SF评分两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);临床疗效联用手法组优于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.920,P<0.05),但总有效率两组差异无统计学意义(x2=3.161,P>0.05).不良反应发生率两组差异无统计学意义(x2=0.005,P>0.05).结论:杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗早中期肝肾亏虚证膝骨关节炎患者,可更有效缓解关节疼痛,改善关节功能与活动度,降低炎症因子(CRP、IL-6)水平,短期疗效优于单纯圆针刀治疗,其远期疗效需长期随访验证.

Objective:This study explores the clinical efficacy of Yang Tianpeng's manipulation combined with circular nee-dle knife based on the theory of equal emphasis on muscles and bones for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods:A total of 98 patients with KOA admitted from November 2023 to May 2025 were randomly divided into an cir-cular needle knife group and a combination therapy group using a random number table.The circular needle knife group adopts independently developed circular needle knife treatment;the combination therapy group was treated with circular needle knife combined with Yang Tianpeng's manipulation.Both groups received treatment for 4 consecutive weeks.Com-pare the visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores,Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index(WOMAC)scores,AIMS2-SF scores,inflammatory factors(C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)),and clinical efficacy before and after intervention,as well as monitor the occur-rence of adverse reactions between two groups.Results:In terms of pain,after 1,2,and 4 weeks of treatment,the VAS scores of the combination therapy group were lower than those of the circular needle knife group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores,the combination therapy group had lower scores in pain,stiffness,swelling,restricted mobility,and lumbar and knee soreness and weakness than the circular needle knife group(P<0.05).In terms of joint function,quality of life,and inflammatory factors,the combination therapy group had lower average levels of WOMAC scores,CRP,and IL-6 compared to the circular needle knife group(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference between the AIMS2-SF groups(P>0.05).In terms of clinical efficacy,the combination therapy group was higher than the circular needle knife group(Z=2.920,P<0.05).However,there was no statistically significant differ-ence in the total effective rate between the two groups(x2=3.161,P>0.05).There was no statistically significant differ-ence in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(x2=0.005,P>0.05).Conclusion:Yang Tianpeng's integrated approach-combining circular needle knife therapy with syndrome differentiation for early-to mid-stage KOA patients presenting liver-kidney deficiency syndrome-more effectively alleviate joint pain,improves joint function and range of motion,and reduce inflammatory factor levels.The short-term efficacy is superior to that of circular needle knife therapy alone,while its long-term outcomes require extended follow-up validation.

黄奎麟;周庭刚;唐军;蒋燕婷;陈荣廷

广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)

医药卫生

膝骨关节炎筋骨并重杨天鹏手法圆针刀疗效

knee osteoarthritisequal emphasis on muscles and bonesYang Tianpeng's manipulationcircular needle knifeefficacy

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 2026 (9)

32-38,7

四川省中医药管理局中医药科研专项课题面上项目(2023MS385)广汉市社会发展医疗卫生领域重点研发项目(GH2022SFY15)

10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.260906

评论