杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察OA
Observation of the Therapeutic Effect of Yang Tianpeng's Manipulation Combined with Circular Needle Knife on Knee Osteoarthritis Based on the Theory of Equal Emphasis on Muscles and Bones
目的:探讨基于"筋骨并重"理论的杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效.方法:选取2023年11月至2025年5月收治的98例膝骨关节炎患者,采用随机数字表法分为针刀组与联用手法组.采用单盲法,针刀组采用自主研发的圆针刀治疗,联用手法组在圆针刀治疗基础上联合杨天鹏手法干预,两组均干预4周.比较两组患者干预前和干预1,2,4周后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,干预前后中医证候评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、第2简化版关节炎生存质量测量量表(AIMS2-SF)评分、炎性因子(C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6))水平及临床疗效,并监测不良反应发生情况.结果:疼痛方面,治疗1,2,4周后联用手法组VAS评分均低于针刀组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);中医证候评分联用手法组疼痛、僵硬、肿胀、活动受限、腰膝酸软5项评分均低于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);关节功能、生存质量和炎性因子水平方面,联用手法组WOMAC评分和CRP、IL-6水平均低于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),AIMS2-SF评分两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);临床疗效联用手法组优于针刀组,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.920,P<0.05),但总有效率两组差异无统计学意义(x2=3.161,P>0.05).不良反应发生率两组差异无统计学意义(x2=0.005,P>0.05).结论:杨天鹏手法联合圆针刀治疗早中期肝肾亏虚证膝骨关节炎患者,可更有效缓解关节疼痛,改善关节功能与活动度,降低炎症因子(CRP、IL-6)水平,短期疗效优于单纯圆针刀治疗,其远期疗效需长期随访验证.
Objective:This study explores the clinical efficacy of Yang Tianpeng's manipulation combined with circular nee-dle knife based on the theory of equal emphasis on muscles and bones for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods:A total of 98 patients with KOA admitted from November 2023 to May 2025 were randomly divided into an cir-cular needle knife group and a combination therapy group using a random number table.The circular needle knife group adopts independently developed circular needle knife treatment;the combination therapy group was treated with circular needle knife combined with Yang Tianpeng's manipulation.Both groups received treatment for 4 consecutive weeks.Com-pare the visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores,Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index(WOMAC)scores,AIMS2-SF scores,inflammatory factors(C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)),and clinical efficacy before and after intervention,as well as monitor the occur-rence of adverse reactions between two groups.Results:In terms of pain,after 1,2,and 4 weeks of treatment,the VAS scores of the combination therapy group were lower than those of the circular needle knife group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores,the combination therapy group had lower scores in pain,stiffness,swelling,restricted mobility,and lumbar and knee soreness and weakness than the circular needle knife group(P<0.05).In terms of joint function,quality of life,and inflammatory factors,the combination therapy group had lower average levels of WOMAC scores,CRP,and IL-6 compared to the circular needle knife group(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference between the AIMS2-SF groups(P>0.05).In terms of clinical efficacy,the combination therapy group was higher than the circular needle knife group(Z=2.920,P<0.05).However,there was no statistically significant differ-ence in the total effective rate between the two groups(x2=3.161,P>0.05).There was no statistically significant differ-ence in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(x2=0.005,P>0.05).Conclusion:Yang Tianpeng's integrated approach-combining circular needle knife therapy with syndrome differentiation for early-to mid-stage KOA patients presenting liver-kidney deficiency syndrome-more effectively alleviate joint pain,improves joint function and range of motion,and reduce inflammatory factor levels.The short-term efficacy is superior to that of circular needle knife therapy alone,while its long-term outcomes require extended follow-up validation.
黄奎麟;周庭刚;唐军;蒋燕婷;陈荣廷
广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)广汉市中医医院(四川 广汉,618300)
医药卫生
膝骨关节炎筋骨并重杨天鹏手法圆针刀疗效
knee osteoarthritisequal emphasis on muscles and bonesYang Tianpeng's manipulationcircular needle knifeefficacy
《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 2026 (9)
32-38,7
四川省中医药管理局中医药科研专项课题面上项目(2023MS385)广汉市社会发展医疗卫生领域重点研发项目(GH2022SFY15)
评论