葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴对ICU患者院内获得性感染影响的Meta分析OA
Effect of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on healthcare-associated infections in intensive care unit patients:a Meta-analysis
目的 系统评价葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴对重症监护病房(ICU)患者院内获得性感染(HAI)发生率及临床结局的影响.方法 系统检索美国国立医学图书馆 PubMed 数据库、荷兰医学文摘 Embase 数据库、Cochrane 图书馆、科学网(Web of Science)、中国知网(CNKI)及万方数据库,收集 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年12 月 31 日发表的、比较葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴与常规擦浴的随机对照试验(RCT).由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价质量.采用 Meta 分析比较两组 HAI、血流感染、肺部感染、泌尿系感染发生率和住院病死率、ICU 住院时间及总住院时间的差异.结果 共纳入 12 篇 RCT,128 927 例 ICU 患者,其中葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴组 63 038 例,对照组 65 889 例.与对照组比较,葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴组HAI发生率[1.93%(1 219/63 038)比 2.26%(1 490/65 889),优势比(OR)=0.72,95%可信区间(95%CI)为 0.62~0.83,P<0.000 01]及血流感染发生率[1.30%(476/36 573)比 1.54%(648/41 968),OR=0.70,95%CI 为 0.62~0.79,P<0.000 01]均显著降低;肺部感染、泌尿系感染、住院病死率和总住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05).葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴组 ICU 住院时间较对照组略长[均数差(MD)=0.17,95%CI 为 0.06~0.28,P=0.004],但绝对差异较小.结论 葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴可降低 ICU 患者 HAI 和血流感染发生率,对其他感染结局、病死率及住院时间的影响仍需更多高质量研究验证.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on healthcare-associated infection(HAI)and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit(ICU)patients.Methods A literature search was conducted across PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Library,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),and Wanfang Data for randomized controlled trial(RCT)comparing chlorhexidine gluconate sponge baths with conventional sponge baths,published from January 1,2000 to December 31,2022.Two investigators independently screened studies,extracted data,and assessed study quality.Meta-analysis was used to compare the differences in the incidence of HAI,bloodstream infection,lung infection,urinary tract infection,as well as the in-hospital mortality,ICU length of stay,and total hospital length of stay between the two groups.Results Twelve RCTs involving 128 927 ICU patients were included:63 038 in the chlorhexidine gluconate bathing group and 65 889 in the control group.Compared with the control group,chlorhexidine gluconate bathing group showed significantly lower incidence of HAI[1.93%(1 219/63 038)vs.2.26%(1 490/65 889);odds ratio(OR)=0.72,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 0.62-0.83,P<0.000 01]and bloodstream infections[1.30%(476/36 573)vs.1.54%(648/41 968);OR=0.70,95%CI was 0.62-0.79,P<0.000 01].No significant differences between groups were found in lung infection,urinary tract infection,in-hospital mortality,or total hospital length of stay(all P>0.05).ICU length of stay was slightly longer in the chlorhexidine gluconate bathing group[mean difference(MD)=0.17 days,95%CI was 0.06-0.28,P=0.004],although the absolute difference was small.Conclusions Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing reduces HAI and bloodstream infections in ICU patients.Its effects on other infection outcomes,mortality,and length of stay require confirmation in further high-quality studies.
赵加贵;钱淑媛;张瑶;王静;王伟;张学超;王乐
东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,江苏 南京 210009
葡萄糖酸氯己定擦浴院内获得性感染血流感染重症监护病房Meta分析
Chlorhexidine gluconateBathingHealthcare-associated infectionBloodstream infectionIntensive care unitMeta-analysis
《中国中西医结合急救杂志》 2026 (4)
419-424,6
东南大学附属中大医院护理科研基金项目(KJZC-HL-202325) Nursing Research Fund Project of Zhongda Hospital,Southeast University(KJZC-HL-202325)
评论