正五聚蛋白3联合APACHE Ⅱ评分对急性感染患者脓毒症发生及预后的预测能力评估OA
Evaluation of the predictive ability of pentraxin 3 combined with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score for the occurrence and prognosis of sepsis in patients with acute infection
目的 探讨正五聚蛋白 3(PTX3)联合急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)对急诊感染/疑似感染患者脓毒症发生及不良结局的预测效能.方法 选择 2023 年 12 月 1 日至 2025 年 5 月 11 日首都医科大学康复医学院中国康复研究中心急诊科收治的急性感染/疑似感染患者作为研究对象,根据脓毒症3.0 标准分为非脓毒症组和脓毒症组,再按 28 d 生存结局将脓毒症患者分为存活组与死亡组.收集患者的人口学特点、基础疾病[高血压、冠心病、糖尿病、脑卒中、恶性肿瘤、心房颤动(房颤)、慢性肾病、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)、卧床]、实验室检查结果[白细胞计数(WBC)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、血乳酸(Lac)、降钙素原(PCT)、PTX3]、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、APACHEⅡ评分、快速 SOFA 评分(qSOFA),以及受累器官数、发生急性肾损伤(AKI)患者数、行机械通气(MV)患者数、休克患者数、营养风险筛查 2002(NRS 2002)评分和住院时间,比较是否发生脓毒症两组和不同临床结局两组上述指标的差异.采用多因素 Logistic 回归分析脓毒症发病的独立危险因素及影响脓毒症患者 28 d 预后的危险因素,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC 曲线)分析 PCT、PTX3、APACHEⅡ评分对脓毒症发病的预测能力,评估 PTX3 联合 APACHEⅡ评分对脓毒症患者不良预后的评估效能.结果 共纳入 218 例急性感染/疑似感染患者,非脓毒症 101 例,脓毒症 117 例.总体 28 d 病死率18.8%(41/218),脓毒症患者 28 d 病死率为 29.1%(34/117).与非脓毒症组比较,脓毒症组年龄更大,卧床患者比例更高,营养状态更差,受累器官数和AKI发生率、MV比例、休克发生率、WBC、CRP、Lac、PCT、PTX3 水平及危重症评分均更高,住院时间更长,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05).与脓毒症生存组比较,死亡组卧床患者比例更高,受累器官数目更多,MV 比例和休克发生率更高,营养状态更差,PTX3、PCT及危重症评分均更高,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05).多因素 Logistic 回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分、PCT 和 PTX3 水平是影响脓毒症发病的独立危险因素[优势比(OR)和 95%可信区间(95%CI)分别为 1.202(1.091~1.324)、1.064(1.004~1.127)、1.362(1.223~1.515),P值分别为 0.000、0.035、0.000];经Lasso回归筛选变量,多因素Logistic回归分析显示,休克、PTX3 和 APACHEⅡ评分是影响脓毒症患者 28 d 预后的独立危险因素[OR 和 95%CI 分别为 4.025(1.393~11.629)、1.203(1.042~1.389)、1.169(1.076~1.269),P值分别为 0.010、0.012、0.010].ROC曲线分析表明,PTX3 联合APACHEⅡ评分对脓毒症发生及 28 d不良预后有良好的预测效能[ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.911、0.860,敏感度分别为 79.5%、85.3%,特异度 91.1%、83.1%].结论 PTX3 可能对急性感染患者发展为脓毒症有早期识别的价值,并且对脓毒症患者 28 d预后有较好的预测价值,联合APACHEⅡ评分会进一步提高预测能力.
Objective To explore the predictive value of pentraxin 3(PTX3)combined with acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)score for sepsis development and adverse outcomes in emergency patients with infection or suspected infection.Methods Patients with acute infection or suspected infection admitted to Rehabilitation Medical College of Capital Medical University,Department of Emergency,China Rehabilitation Research Center,from December 1,2023,to May 11,2025,were enrolled as research subjects.Patients were classified into non-sepsis and sepsis groups according to the Sepsis 3.0 criteria,and sepsis patients were further divided into survivors and non-survivors based on 28-day survival status.Collect the patients'demographic characteristics,underlying diseases[hypertension,coronary heart disease,diabetes,stroke,malignant tumor,atrial fibrillation,chronic kidney disease,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD),and bedridden status],laboratory findings[white blood cell count(WBC),C-reactive protein(CRP),lactic acid(Lac),procalcitonin(PCT),and PTX3],sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score,APACHE Ⅱ score,quick SOFA(qSOFA)score,as well as number of affected organs,number of patients with acute kidney injury(AKI),number of patients receiving mechanical ventilation(MV),number of patients with shock,nutritional risk screening 2002(NRS 2002)score,and length of hospital stay,and compare the differences in the above indicators between the two groups with and without sepsis and between the two groups with different clinical outcomes.Multivariate Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for sepsis development and factors influencing the 28-day prognosis of sepsis patients.Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)were constructed to evaluate the predictive ability of PCT,PTX3 and APACHEⅡscore for sepsis,and the efficacy of PTX3 combined with APACHEⅡscore in predicting adverse outcomes in septic patients was assessed.Results A total of 218 patients were enrolled,comprising 101 non-sepsis cases and 117 sepsis cases.The overall 28-day mortality rate was 18.8%(41/218),while the 28-day mortality rate for sepsis patients was 29.1%(34/117).Compared with the non-sepsis group,the sepsis group was older,had a higher proportion of bedridden patients,had poorer nutritional status,and showed significantly higher numbers of affected organs,incidence of AKI,proportion of patients receiving MV,incidence of shock,levels of WBC,CRP,Lac,PCT,and PTX3,as well as critical illness scores,along with a longer length of hospital stay;all differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Compared with the sepsis survivor group,the non-survivor group had a higher proportion of bedridden patients,a greater number of affected organs,higher proportions of patients receiving MV and experiencing shock,poorer nutritional status,and higher levels of PTX3 and PCT as well as critical illness scores;all differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression revealed that APACHEⅡscore,PCT and PTX3 level were independent risk factors for sepsis development[odds ratios(OR)and 95%confidence interval(95%CI):1.202(1.091-1.324),1.064(1.004-1.127),and 1.362(1.223-1.515);P values were 0.000,0.035,and 0.000,respectively].After variable selection using Lasso regression,multivariate Logistic regression found that the occurrence of shock,PTX3,and APACHEⅡscore as independent predictors of 28-day mortality in sepsis patients[OR and 95%CI:4.025(1.393-11.629),1.203(1.042-1.389),1.169(1.076-1.269);P values:0.010,0.012,0.010,respectively].ROC curve analysis showed that the combination of PTX3 and APACHEⅡscore had good predictive performance for the development of sepsis and adverse 28-day outcomes[area under the curve(AUC)=0.911,0.860,sensitivity were 79.5%,85.3%,specificity were 91.1%,83.1%).Conclusions PTX3 may have the value of early identification for the development of sepsis in patients with acute infection and has a good predictive value for the 28-day prognosis of sepsis patients.Combined with APACHEⅡscore,it will further improve predictive ability.
刘芦姗;王丰容;秦卓;李俊玉;王雅慧;王娜
首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心急诊科,北京 100068
正五聚蛋白3急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ脓毒症早期识别预后
Pentraxin 3Acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡSepsisEarly recognitionPrognosis
《中国中西医结合急救杂志》 2026 (4)
408-414,7
中国残联研究课题(20&YB019)中国康复研究中心科研课题(2023-ZX-06) China Disabled Persons'Federation Research Project(20&YB019)China Rehabilitation Research Center Project(2023-ZX-06)
评论