首页|期刊导航|中国医学装备|脑膜瘤瘤周水肿的磁共振成像特征量化分析与术中脑组织粘连程度及病理浸润的关系研究

脑膜瘤瘤周水肿的磁共振成像特征量化分析与术中脑组织粘连程度及病理浸润的关系研究OA

Relationship between quantitative analysis for MRI features,and intraoperative adhesion and pathological invasion in peritumoral edema of brain tissue of patients with meningioma

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨脑膜瘤瘤周水肿的磁共振成像(MRI)特征量化分析与术中脑组织粘连程度及病理浸润的关系.方法:回顾性收集2023年1月至2025年12月黄冈市中心医院收治且进行手术治疗的180例脑膜瘤手术患者临床资料,根据术后是否有脑浸润的病理结果将其分为浸润组(36例)和未浸润组(144例).所有患者术前均接受多模态MRI检查,量化分析脑膜瘤瘤周水肿的影像参数,采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析筛选与脑浸润及重度粘连相关的独立影响因素.结果:MRI量化特征显示,浸润组多模态MRI的不均匀强化占比(69.44%)和囊变坏死占比(58.33%)均显著高于未浸润组的(38.19%)和(22.92%),差异均有统计学意义(x2=11.391、17.202,P<0.05).脑浸润组在男性比例、水肿最大径、胆碱(Cho)值、肌酸(Cr)及瘤周水肿区各向异性分数(FA)值等方面均显著高于未浸润组,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.846、9.570、7.633、2.061、6.178,P<0.05),而表观弥散系数(ADC)值、平均扩散率(MD)、轴向扩散率(AD)、径向扩散率(RD)及水肿/瘤体体积比等参数均显著低于未浸润组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.384、3.405、2.452、3.245、11.510,P<0.05).多因素分析显示,强化方式不均匀、水肿最大径增大及Cho/Cr比值升高是脑浸润和重度粘连的独立危险因素(OR=3.337、3.357、2.549,P<0.05),而肿瘤形态规则、ADC值较高及水肿/瘤体体积比较大是其独立保护因素(OR=0.305、0.372、0.147,P<0.05).结论:脑膜瘤瘤周水肿的MRI量化特征与术中脑组织粘连程度及病理浸润显著相关,强化方式、水肿范围、Cho/Cr比值、肿瘤形态、ADC值及水肿/瘤体体积比可作为术前预测肿瘤侵袭性和粘连程度的重要影像学指标,为优化手术策略提供依据.

Objective:To investigate the relationship between quantitative analysis for the features of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),and intraoperative adhesion and pathological invasion of peritumoral edema of brain tissue of patients with meningioma.Methods:The clinical data of 180 patients who underwent surgery for meningioma at Huanggang Central Hospital were retrospectively enrolled from January 2023 to December 2025,and they were divided into a brain invasion group(36 cases)and a non-invasion group(144 cases)according to postoperatively pathological results.All patients underwent preoperatively multimodal MRI examination,and the imaging parameters of peritumoral edema were quantitatively analyzed.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were adopted to identify independent influencing factors that associated with brain invasion and severe adhesion.Results:MRI quantitative features indicated that the proportion of uneven enhancement(69.44%)and cystic necrosis(58.33%)of brain invasion group were significantly higher than those(38.19%and 22.92%)of non-invasion group,and the differences were statistically significant(x2=11.391,17.202,P<0.05).The male proportion,maximum diameter of edema,choline(Cho)value,Creatine(Cr)value,and fractional anisotropy(FA)values of peritumoral edema area of brain invasion group were significantly higher than those of non-invasion group,with statistically significant differences(t=6.846,9.570,7.633,6.178,4.321,P<0.05).However,the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),mean diffusivity(MD),axial diffusivity(AD),radial diffusivity(RD),and volume ratio of edema-to-tumor of brain invasion group were significantly lower than those of non-invasion group,and the differences were significant(t=3.384,3.405,2.452,3.245,11.510,P<0.05).Multivariate analysis revealed that uneven enhancement method,increased maximum diameter of edema,and elevated Cho/Cr ratio were independent risk factors for brain invasion and severe adhesion(OR=3.337,3.357,2.549,P<0.05),while regular morphology of tumor,higher ADC value,and larger volume ratio of edema-to-tumor were independent protective factors for them(OR=0.305,0.372,0.147,P<0.05).Conclusion:Quantitative MRI features of peritumoral edema of meningioma significantly relate to the degree of intraoperative adhesion of brain tissue,and the pathological invasion.Enhancement mode,edema range,Cho/Cr ratio,tumor morphology,ADC value,and volume ratio of edema-to-tumor can be used as important imaging indicators for predicting tumor invasiveness and adhesion severity before surgery,which can provide a basis for optimizing surgical strategy.

杨均铖;江鹏;丁理;周都

黄冈市中心医院影像科 黄冈 438000黄冈市中心医院影像科 黄冈 438000黄冈市中心医院影像科 黄冈 438000黄冈市中心医院影像科 黄冈 438000

医药卫生

脑膜瘤瘤周水肿磁共振成像(MRI)粘连程度病理浸润

MeningiomaPeritumoral edemaMagnetic resonance imaging(MRI)Adhesion degreePathological invasion

《中国医学装备》 2026 (9)

50-58,9

湖北省卫生健康委科研立项(WJ2022F150) Health Commission of Hubei Province Scientific Research Project(WJ2022F150)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2026.09.009

评论