首页|期刊导航|中国循证儿科杂志|基于遗传负荷构建新生儿重症监护室轻度脑电异常患儿预后不良预测模型的巢式病例对照研究

基于遗传负荷构建新生儿重症监护室轻度脑电异常患儿预后不良预测模型的巢式病例对照研究OA

Developing a genetic burden-based prediction model for adverse prognosis in neonates with mild electroencephalogram abnormalities in the NICU:a nested case-control study

中文摘要英文摘要

背景 脑电图(electroencephalogram,EEG)轻度异常在新生儿重症监护室(neonatal intensive care unit,NICU)中极为常见,但预后差异显著,部分患儿为一过性改变,部分则隐匿进展为严重神经发育障碍.目的 探索NICU轻度EEG异常患儿遗传风险基因与不良预后的关联,构建并验证具备临床可操作性的预测模型.设计 巢式病例对照研究.方法 纳入2020年6月至2024年12月于复旦大学附属儿科医院NICU住院、完成基因检测的轻度EEG异常患儿.分析其中遗传诊断阳性患儿的遗传疾病谱.以其中遗传诊断阴性患儿为队列人群,以1岁时随访出现神经发育迟缓、运动发育迟缓、脑瘫或死亡中任何一项定义为预后不良(病例组),否则定义为预后良好.通过1∶3倾向性评分匹配预后良好的患儿为对照组.比较两组在目标基因中有害罕见变异的携带率或负荷差异,识别潜在的风险基因,并计算患儿罕见变异负荷评分;提取患儿定量脑电特征并收集患儿临床资料.以2020年6月1日至2024年2月1日纳入的患儿作为模型构建集,以2024年2月2日至12月31日纳入的患儿作为独立的验证集用于模型验证.主要结局指标 遗传疾病谱和预测模型性能.结果 2020年6月至2024年2月纳入NICU住院轻度EEG异常新生儿1 082例.男609例(56.3%),女473例(43.7%).其中遗传诊断阳性235例(21.7%),呈现显著遗传异质性:脑发育及功能相关基因91例共103种,以神经系统、代谢系统及综合征为主,ABCC8为最常见基因;153例携带177种非脑发育及功能相关基因,涉及代谢、循环、血液等多系统基因,G6PD最常见.遗传诊断阴性847例,模型构建集543例(其中病例组133例,匹配对照组410例).验证集80例,其中病例组20例,对照组60例.模型构建集与验证集在临床基线特征方面差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).模型构建集中,基因水平负荷分析识别出54个与预后不良相关的风险基因,提取到42项核心脑电特征,根据单因素逻辑回归分析筛选出4项临床表型(临床惊厥发作、呼吸衰竭/呼吸困难、新生儿脑病/脑损伤和头颅MRI)和1项遗传预测因子(罕见变异负荷评分).基于4项临床表型、EEG特征和遗传预测因子的联合模型在模型构建集中的AUC=0.80(95%CI:0.76~0.83);在验证集中AUC=0.86(95%CI:0.74~0.98).结论 遗传因素在NICU轻度EEG异常患儿预后分层中起到关键作用,并且提出的遗传负荷模型是一种有前景的工具,可用于识别潜在不良神经发育结局的高风险新生儿,为实现精准儿童神经病学提供了新策略.

Background Mild electroencephalogram(EEG)abnormalities are extremely common in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit(NICU).However,their prognoses vary significantly—while some cases represent transient changes,others insidiously progress into severe neurodevelopmental disorders.Objective To investigate the association between genetic risk genes and adverse outcomes in NICU patients with mild EEG abnormalities,and to construct and validate a clinically actionable predictive model.Design A nested case-control study.Methods Patients admitted to the NICU at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University between June 2020 and December 2024 who presented with mild EEG abnormalities and underwent genetic testing were enrolled.The spectrum of genetic disorders among patients with positive genetic diagnoses were analyzed.Children with negative genetic diagnoses were used as the cohort population.Poor prognosis(case group)was defined as the presence of any one of the following at 1 year of age:neurodevelopmental delay,motor developmental delay,cerebral palsy,or death.Otherwise,good prognosis was defined as the outcome of the disease.Patients with favorable outcomes were matched to the case group at a 3∶1 ratio using propensity score matching to serve as the control group.The carrier rates or burdens of rare deleterious variants within specific target genes between the two groups were compared to identify potential risk genes,and a"rare variant burden score"for each patient was calculated.Additionally,quantitative EEG features were extracted and clinical data were collected.The patients included from June 1,2020 to February 1,2024 were used as the model construction set,and the children included from February 2,2024 to December 31,2024 were used as an independent validation set for model validation.Main Outcome Measures The spectrum of genetic disorders and the performance of the predictive model.Results Between June 2020 and February 2024,a total of 1,082 neonates admitted to the NICU with mild EEG abnormalities were enrolled in the study.The cohort comprised 609 males(56.3%)and 473 females(43.7%).Among them,235 cases(21.7%)received a positive genetic diagnosis,exhibiting significant genetic heterogeneity:91 cases involved a total of 103 genes related to brain development and function—predominantly associated with neurological,metabolic,and syndromic disorders—with ABCC8 identified as the most common gene;conversely,153 cases carried 177 genes unrelated to brain development and function—most frequently G6PD—involving genes across multiple systems,including metabolic system,circulatory system and hematological system.There were 847 cases with a negative genetic diagnosis;these constituted the model construction set,comprising 543 cases(including 133 cases in the case group and 410 in the matched control group).The validation set consisted of 80 cases,including 20 cases in the case group and 60 cases in the control group.There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline characteristics between the model construction set and the validation set(all P>0.05).Within the model construction set,gene-level burden analysis identified 54 risk genes associated with poor prognosis;furthermore,42 core EEG features were extracted.Based on univariate logistic regression analysis,four clinical phenotypes(clinical seizures,respiratory failure/distress,neonatal encephalopathy/brain injury,and cranial MRI findings)and one genetic predictor(rare variant burden score)were selected for model construction.The combined model,incorporating the four clinical phenotypes,EEG features,and the genetic predictor,yielded an AUC of 0.80(95%CI:0.76-0.83)in the model construction set,and an AUC of 0.86(95%CI:0.74-0.98)in the validation set.Conclusion Genetic factors play a pivotal role in the prognostic stratification of NICU patients with mild EEG abnormalities;furthermore,the proposed genetic burden model represents a promising tool for identifying neonates at high risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes,thereby offering a novel strategy for the realization of precision child neurology.

杨芳;杨琳;周文浩;李佳琦;努尔比亚·哈力克;胡黎园;王来栓;程国强;卢宇蓝;吴冰冰;董欣然

温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院 温州,325003||复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 内分泌代谢科,上海,201102温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院 温州,325003||广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心 广州,510623||上海市出生缺陷防治重点实验室 复旦大学附属儿科医院 上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 新生儿科,上海,201102广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心 广州,510623复旦大学附属儿科医院 分子医学中心,上海,201102复旦大学附属儿科医院 分子医学中心,上海,201102

新生儿脑电图异常预后遗传负荷

NeonateElectroencephalogram abnormalitiesPrognosisGenetic load

《中国循证儿科杂志》 2026 (4)

279-286,8

国家重点研发计划(新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病早期筛查与诊疗方案优化研究):2024YFC2707700

10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2026.04.010

评论