首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|中国碳交易市场转型中的多元目标法律规制

中国碳交易市场转型中的多元目标法律规制OA

Legal regulation of multiple objectives in the transition of China's carbon trading market

中文摘要英文摘要

在"双碳"目标驱动下,中国碳交易市场正由以强度控制为主向强化总量控制过渡,并由单一减排工具拓展为兼顾经济效率、环境约束与公平分配的复合治理机制.然而,多重目标的并存使不同目标之间的协调难题也随之凸显.该研究综合运用规范分析、比较分析和目标—工具匹配分析方法,梳理《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》的相关规范与碳市场政策文本,并以欧盟碳市场治理模式为比较参照,考察中国碳市场在转型过程中面临的多目标协同困境.研究发现,当前中国碳市场主要面临3个方面的问题:①在规范层面,法律规则与技术机制衔接不足,配额形成、数据核查和监管责任边界等仍需细化;②在结构层面,全国碳市场与地方试点碳市场之间存在规则差异和价格传导障碍,整体仍呈分割状态;③在价值层面,减排约束、经济效率和公平分配之间缺乏稳定的协调机制,制度工具与治理目标之间尚未形成有效匹配.研究表明,碳市场规制不能仅依赖增加政策工具或强化行政履约约束,而应形成能够统合目标冲突的价值基准.生态公平可以作为碳市场多目标协调的解释性原则,并为制度工具配置提供评价标准.基于生态公平,碳市场法律规制路径应围绕3个维度展开:①通过差异化配额分配、跨区域协同和碳汇交易机制,优化减排责任分担,促进代内公平;②通过强化总量约束、跨期收益转化和政策工具评估机制,维护后代利益,保障代际公平;③通过统一市场衔接规则、完善协同监管和责任配置机制,提升制度运行的稳定性与可预期性,实现制度公平.

Driven by the"dual carbon"goals,China's carbon trading market is transitioning from a primarily intensity-based control system to one emphasizing total emissions cap management.Its institutional functions have also evolved from a single emission reduc-tion tool into a composite governance mechanism that balances economic efficiency,environmental constraints,and equitable distribu-tion.However,the coexistence of multiple objectives has also highlighted challenges in coordinating these goals.This study integrates normative analysis,comparative analysis,and goal-instrument matching methods to examine relevant provisions in the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China and carbon market policy documents,using the European Union's carbon mar-ket governance model as a comparative benchmark to explore the multi-objective coordination difficulties facing China's carbon market during its transformation.The study finds that China's current carbon market faces three main issues:(1)At the normative level,legal rules and technical mechanisms are inadequately integrated,with quota allocation,data verification,and regulatory responsibility boundaries still requiring refinement.(2)At the structural level,discrepancies in rules and price transmission barriers exist between the national carbon market and local pilot markets,leaving the system fragmented overall.(3)At the value level,the absence of stable coor-dination mechanisms among emission reduction constraints,economic efficiency,and fair distribution has produced a persistent mis-alignment between institutional tools and governance objectives.The study demonstrates that carbon market regulation cannot rely sole-ly on adding policy instruments or strengthening administrative compliance enforcement;instead,it must establish a value foundation capable of integrating conflicting objectives.Ecological fairness can serve as an interpretive principle for coordinating multiple objec-tives in carbon markets and provide a standard for evaluating institutional instrument design.Based on ecological fairness,carbon mar-ket legal regulation should focus on three dimensions:(1)promoting intragenerational equity through differentiated quota allocation,cross-regional collaboration,and carbon sink trading mechanisms to optimize the distribution of emission reduction responsibilities;(2)ensuring intergenerational equity by reinforcing total emissions caps,facilitating intertemporal benefit conversion,and establishing policy instrument evaluation mechanisms to safeguard the interests of future generations;and(3)enhancing institutional stability and predictability through unified market integration rules,improved coordinated supervision,and refined responsibility allocation mecha-nisms to achieve institutional fairness.

赖虹宇;先文灏

西南财经大学法学院,四川 成都 611130西南财经大学法学院,四川 成都 611130

社会科学

碳排放权交易"双碳"目标生态公平生态环境法典

carbon emissions trading"dual carbon"goalsecological equityEcological and Environmental Code

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (8)

63-72,10

国家社会科学基金青年项目"降碳与增长协同下碳排放权交易金融化的体系性法律机制研究"(批准号:23CFX054).

10.12062/cpre.20260307

评论