首页|期刊导航|中国临床医学影像杂志|探讨瘤周非强化区MRI征象对大脑半球高级别胶质瘤的诊断及鉴别意义

探讨瘤周非强化区MRI征象对大脑半球高级别胶质瘤的诊断及鉴别意义OA

Diagnostic and differential value of MRI signs in the non-enhancing peritumoral area for high-grade gliomas of the cerebral hemisphere

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨瘤周非强化区(NEPA)MRI征象在大脑半球高级别胶质瘤(HGG)与单发脑转移瘤鉴别诊断中的价值.方法:回顾性纳入2021年1月—2024年12月于我院经病理证实的大脑半球HGG患者68例及单发脑转移瘤患者58例,外部验证集44例(HGG 24例、单发脑转移瘤20例)用于模型泛化能力评价.所有患者术前完成常规MRI、DWI及DSC灌注检查,部分患者行多模型扩散、APT及¹H-MRS检查.评估NEPA形态学征象,并在强化灶外周近端区(IPR)及远端区(DPR)测量ADC、rCBV等定量参数.采用Logistic回归构建鉴别模型,绘制ROC曲线并计算AUC,以Youden指数确定最佳截断值.结果:HGG组NEPA FLAIR高信号异质性(82.4%vs.37.9%)、过渡带模糊(73.5%vs.31.0%)及皮质/灰白质交界受累(50.0%vs.17.2%)比例均高于转移瘤组(均P<0.001).HGG组IPR-ADC低于转移瘤组((1.05±0.18)×10⁻³ mm²/s vs.(1.28±0.20)×10⁻³ mm²/s),IPR-rCBV高于转移瘤组(2.10±0.55 vs.1.25±0.40)(均P<0.001).综合形态学与定量参数的模型AUC为0.95(95%CI:0.90~0.98),敏感度为0.90,特异度为0.88,准确率为0.89;在外部验证集中,综合模型AUC为0.92(95%CI:0.83~0.98),敏感度为0.88,特异度为0.85,准确率为0.86.结论:NEPA的形态学征象结合扩散与灌注定量指标可提高大脑半球HGG与单发脑转移瘤的鉴别诊断效能;IPR区相对低ADC与高rCBV可能提示强化边缘外存在浸润性肿瘤成分.

Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of MRI signs in the non-enhancing peritumoral area(NEPA)for differentiating hemispheric high-grade gliomas(HGGs)from solitary brain metastasis.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 68 patients with pathologically confirmed hemispheric HGG and 58 patients with solitary brain metastasis who underwent preoperative conventional MRI,DWI and DSC perfusion MRI between January 2021 and December 2024.An external validation set of 44 patients(n=44;24 HGGs and 20 metastases)was additionally created for model validation.A subset also underwent advanced diffusion imaging,APT imaging and ¹H-MRS.Two neuroradiologists blindly evaluated the morphological features of NEPA and measured ADC and rCBV in the inner peritumoral region(IPR)and distal peritumoral region(DPR).Logistic regression and ROC analyses were performed,and optimal cut-off values were determined by the Youden index.Results:Compared with metastases,HGGs more frequently showed heterogeneous FLAIR hyperintensity(82.4%vs.37.9%),a blurred transition zone(73.5%vs.31.0%)and cortical/gray-white junction involvement(50.0%vs.17.2%)in NEPA(all P<0.001).The IPR-ADC was lower in HGGs than in metastases((1.05±0.18)×10-³ mm²/s vs.(1.28±0.20)×10-³ mm²/s),whereas the IPR-rCBV was higher(2.10±0.55 vs.1.25±0.40)(both P<0.001).The combined qualitative-quantitative model achieved an AUC of 0.95(95%CI:0.90~0.98),with a sensitivity of 0.90,specificity of 0.88 and accuracy of 0.89.In the external validation set,the combined model yielded an AUC of 0.92(95%CI:0.83~0.98),with a sensitivity of 0.88,specific-ity of 0.85 and accuracy of 0.86.Conclusion:The morphological features of NEPA combined with diffusion and perfusion quantitative indicators can improve the differential diagnostic efficiency between cerebral hemisphere HGG and single brain metastases.The relatively low ADC and high rCBV in the IPR area may indicate the presence of invasive tumor components outside the enhanced edge.

刘莹;甄文剑;郭宇;王国杰

邢台市中心医院,河北 邢台 054000邢台市中心医院,河北 邢台 054000邢台市中心医院,河北 邢台 054000邢台市中心医院,河北 邢台 054000

医药卫生

脑肿瘤神经胶质瘤磁共振成像

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMagnetic Resonance Imaging

《中国临床医学影像杂志》 2026 (9)

609-614,6

邢台市重点研发计划项目(2020ZC308).

10.12117/jccmi.2026.09.001

评论