首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学与治疗学|三种喹诺酮类药物的体外抗菌活性和防突变能力评价

三种喹诺酮类药物的体外抗菌活性和防突变能力评价OA

Evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity and mutant prevention potential of three quinolone antibiotics

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨奈诺沙星、左氧氟沙星及莫西沙星三种喹诺酮类抗菌药物对革兰氏阳性菌(G+)和革兰氏阴性菌(G-)的体外抑菌效果,为临床合理使用提供依据.方法:采用微量肉汤稀释法(broth microdilution method)对 292株临床分离菌株[包括甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(me-thicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus,MSSA)、表皮葡萄球菌、屎肠球菌、纹带棒状杆菌、大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌]进行药物敏感性试验,比较三种药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)分布、药效学特征.用琼脂稀释法进一步测定部分菌株的防突变浓度(MPC),评估防突变能力.结果:在G+菌中,奈诺沙星对金黄色葡萄球菌(MIC90=16 μg/mL)、表皮葡萄球菌(MIC90=2 μg/mL)及纹带棒状杆菌(MIC90=4 μg/mL)的活性均优于左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星.在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,MR-SA)菌株中,奈诺沙星的敏感率达 66.96%.在G-菌中,铜绿假单胞菌对左氧氟沙星的MIC90 为 2 μg/mL,低于奈诺沙星和莫西沙星(均为 4 μg/mL);肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠埃希菌及鲍曼不动杆菌对三药的MIC90 多为 64 μg/mL,整体敏感性较低.在防突变能力方面,MSSA中奈诺沙星的MPC90 为 2 μg/mL,低于莫西沙星(4 μg/mL)和左氧氟沙星(16 μg/mL),其选择指数(selec-tion index,SI)的范围最小;在耐药G-菌中三药MPC90 普遍较高,SI也明显增大.但左氧氟沙星对耐药铜绿假单胞菌的MPC90(16 μg/mL)低于莫西沙星(32 μg/mL)和奈诺沙星(64 μg/mL).结论:奈诺沙星在金黄色葡萄球菌(含MRSA)等G+菌中显示出更强的抗菌活性,且在MSSA中表现出最强的防突变能力.左氧氟沙星在铜绿假单胞菌中维持了较好的抗菌活性,且其防突变浓度在受试药中相对较低.临床应用中应结合病原体类型和耐药风险进行选择.

AIM:To evaluate the in vitro antibac-terial efficacy of three quinolones—nemonoxacin,levofloxacin,and moxifloxacin—against Gram-posi-tive(G+)and Gram-negative(G-)bacteria,providing a scientific basis for rational clinical use.METHODS:Drug susceptibility tests were conducted on 292 clinical isolates(including Staphylococcus aureus,Staphylococcus epidermidis,Enterococcus faecium,Corynebacterium striatum,Escherichia coli,Klebsiel-la pneumoniae,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,and Acinetobacter baumannii)using the broth microdi-lution method to compare the distribution of mini-mum inhibitory concentrations(MICs)and pharma-codynamic characteristics.The mutant prevention concentration(MPC)of selected strains was further determined by the agar dilution method to evalu-ate their mutant prevention capabilities.RESULTS:For G+bacteria,nemonoxacin exhibited superior ac-tivity against Staphylococcus aureus(MIC90=16 μg/mL),Staphylococcus epidermidis(MIC90=2 μg/mL),and Corynebacterium striatum(MIC90=4 μg/mL)compared to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.In MRSA strains,the susceptibility rate of nemonoxacin reached 66.96%.For G-bacteria,the MIC90 of levofloxacin against P.aeruginosa was 2 μg/mL,which was lower than that of nemonoxacin and moxifloxacin(both 4 μg/mL).For K.pneumoni-ae,E.coli,and A.baumannii,the MIC90 values for all three drugs were mostly 64 μg/mL,indicating over-all low susceptibility.In terms of mutant preven-tion,nemonoxacin showed an MPC90 of 2 μg/mL in MSSA,which was lower than that of moxifloxacin(4 μg/mL)and levofloxacin(16 μg/mL),with the nar-rowest range of selection index(SI).In resistant G—bacteria,the MPC90 and SI values for all three drugs were generally higher.However,the MPC90 of lev-ofloxacin against resistant P.aeruginosa(16 μg/mL)was lower than that of moxifloxacin(32 μg/mL)and nemonoxacin(64 μg/mL).CONCLUSION:Nemonoxacin demonstrates stronger antibacterial activity against G+bacteria such as S.aureus(includ-ing MRSA)and possesses the most potent mutant prevention capability in MSSA.Levofloxacin main-tains favorable antibacterial activity against P.aeruginosa,and its MPC is relatively lower among the tested drugs.Clinical selection should be based on the specific pathogen type and the risk of resis-tance.

罗开萍;徐杰;张险峰;石新;杭永付

苏州大学附属第一医院 药学部,苏州 215006,江苏||苏州大学药学院,苏州 215006,江苏苏州大学附属第一医院 临床检测中心,苏州 215006,江苏苏州大学附属第一医院 临床检测中心,苏州 215006,江苏苏州大学附属第一医院 药学部,苏州 215006,江苏苏州大学附属第一医院 药学部,苏州 215006,江苏||苏州大学药学院,苏州 215006,江苏

医药卫生

奈诺沙星左氧氟沙星莫西沙星最低抑菌浓度防突变浓度

nemonoxacinlevofloxacinmoxi-floxacinminimum inhibitory concentrationmu-tant prevention concentration

《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 2026 (8)

1064-1069,6

江苏省医学重点学科(ZDXK202247)白求恩公益基金会-社区感染性疾病科研能力建设项目(BCF-XC-SQ-20221206-10)

10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.08.006

评论