首页|期刊导航|中国康复理论与实践|老年脑卒中偏瘫患者不同站立姿势下静态平衡特征的比较

老年脑卒中偏瘫患者不同站立姿势下静态平衡特征的比较OA

Comparison of static balance characteristics under different standing postures in older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较老年脑卒中偏瘫患者在不同站立姿势下静态平衡特征的差异. 方法 选取2022年9月至2024年8月江苏盛泽医院老年脑卒中偏瘫患者38例,采用Prokin平衡测试和训练系统评估患者在7种站立姿势下的静态平衡特征,包括双足并拢站姿(BS)、患侧半串联站姿(ASTS)、健侧半串联站姿(USTS)、患侧串联站姿(ATS)、健侧串联站姿(UTS)、健侧单腿站姿(UMS)和自选站姿(SS).每项任务中维持姿势稳定15 s.采集静态平衡的压力中心(COP)参数,包括前后方向平均运动速度(VAP)、左右方向平均运动速度(VML)、运动面积(SA)、运动长度(SL)、前后方向标准差(SDAP)和左右方向标准差(SDML). 结果 不同站立姿势对患者的COP参数均有显著主效应(F>39.793,χ2=109.632,P<0.001).SS在多数COP指标上表现出较小的姿势摆动(P<0.05),UMS在VAP、VML、SA和SL方面高于其他站姿(P<0.05),除SDML外,UTS的COP参数均高于BS、ASTS和USTS(P<0.05),且UTS的VAP、SA、SL和SDAP高于ATS(P<0.05).除VML和SDML外,ATS的COP参数均高于BS、ASTS和USTS(P<0.05).USTS的VAP高于BS(P<0.05). 结论 在具有较好独立站立能力的老年脑卒中偏瘫患者中,不同站姿下COP参数存在差异.SS的姿势摆动较小,UMS和UTS姿势摆动较大;串联站姿下双足前后位置可能影响静态平衡控制.

Objective To compare static balance characteristics under different standing postures in older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Methods A total of 38 older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia in Jiangsu Shengze Hospital from September,2022 to August,2024 were enrolled.Static balance was assessed using the ProKin Balance Testing and Training System under seven standing postures:bipedal stance(BS),affected semi-tandem stance(ASTS),unaffected semi-tan-dem stance(USTS),affected tandem stance(ATS),unaffected tandem stance(UTS),unaffected monopedal stance(UMS)and self-selected stance(SS).Participants were required to maintain each posture for 15 seconds.Center-of-pressure(COP)parameters were recorded,including mean sway velocity in the anteroposterior direc-tion(VAP),mean sway velocity in the mediolateral direction(VML),sway area(SA),sway path length(SL),standard deviation in the anteroposterior direction(SDAP),and standard deviation in the mediolateral direction(SDML). Results Main effect of standing posture was significant in all COP parameters(F>39.793,χ2=109.632,P<0.001).SS showed smaller postural sway for most COP measures than the other postures(P<0.05).VAP,VML,SA and SL were higher during UMS than during the other postures(P<0.05).COP parameters during UTS were higher than those during BS,ASTS and USTS(P<0.05),and VAP,SA,SL and SDAP during UTS were higher than those during ATS(P<0.05).Except for VML and SDML,COP parameters during ATS were higher than those during BS,ASTS and USTS(P<0.05).VAP during USTS was higher than that during BS(P<0.05). Conclusion In older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia who have relatively good independent standing ability,COP parameters differ across standing postures.Postural sway is relatively small during SS,and great during UMS and UTS.The anteroposterior positioning of the feet during tandem stance may influence static balance control.

苏盼盼;何川;琼吉;孟殿怀

南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州市 215228南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院康复医学科,江苏 苏州市 215228拉萨市人民医院重症医学科,西藏 拉萨市 850000南京医科大学第一附属医院康复医学中心,江苏 南京市 210029

医药卫生

老年人脑卒中偏瘫站立姿势静态平衡

older adultsstrokehemiplegiastanding posturestatic balance

《中国康复理论与实践》 2026 (9)

1052-1060,9

1.江苏省重点研发项目(No.2021012-4)2.苏州市吴江区科教兴卫项目(No.WWK202610) Supported by Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program(No.2021012-4)and Wujiang Science-Education Program for Health Development of Suzhou(No.WWK202610)

10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2026.09.007

评论