论人工智能风格迁移输出物的法律属性及其归属OACHSSCD
On the Legal Attributes and Ownership of the Outputs of the AI Style Transfer Model
以吉卜力为代表的风格迁移类AI模型风靡一时,其"一键生成"的输出物属于人工智能生成内容(AIGC).鉴于AIGC的可版权问题素有争议,有必要加强对输出物法律属性及归属的探讨.模型用户的操作因缺乏创作空间且未能直接控制或影响表达要素,一般不宜定性为"创作";吉卜力等风格迁移模型输出物并非"作品",难以凭借赋权逻辑由模型用户享有版权,但这并不意味着社会公众能任意、无偿使用他人利用模型输出之物.AI输出物作为可能具有某种经济价值与效用之物,法律应对其属性及归属作出妥善安排.具体适用上,应按以下规则依次安排:首先应遵循约定优先原则,输出物的归属可依约定;其次在无约定或约定不明时,对于有可识别的强映射关系的输出物,可视为衍生品,一般由素材相关权利人享有,模型用户须获得授权后才有权对输出物进行使用、收益;对不具有可识别的映射关系的,输出物的使用、收益权等原则上由用户享有.
AI style-transfer models typified by Ghibli style generators have gained immense popularity,with their one-click output constituting AI-generated content(AIGC).Amid the controversial copyright eligibility of AIGC,an in-depth analysis of the legal nature and ownership of such outputs is essential.Model users' operations lack creative autonomy and direct control over expressive elements,and hence cannot be categorized as creation.The outputs of such models are not copyrightable works,precluding model users from claiming copyright based on the empowerment principle.Nevertheless,the public is not allowed to arbitrarily and gratuitously use such AI output,for they may possess economic value and utility,requiring proper regulation of their legal nature and ownership.The applicable rules follow a priority order:contractual agreements govern ownership in the first place;failing a valid agreement,outputs with a recognizable strong mapping relation to original materials shall be deemed derivative works and owned by the right holders of the original materials(model users need authorization for exploitation and profit-making),while model users shall in principle hold the exploitation and profit rights to outputs without such identifiable relations.
董慧娟;魏荣豪
厦门大学知识产权研究院厦门大学知识产权研究院
风格迁移输出物版权
style transferoutputcopyright
《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (4)
1-14,14
2025年国家社会科学基金重点项目《受算法控制或影响的弱势群体权益法治保障研究》(25AKX003)
评论