首页|期刊导航|生态环境学报|新疆景观生态风险评价及稳定性分析

新疆景观生态风险评价及稳定性分析OA

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Stability Analysis in Xinjiang

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]开展长时序景观生态风险评价及稳定性分析,为干旱区生态风险精准防控与区域生态安全格局的构建提供科学依据.[方法]基于2000-2020年5期土地利用数据计算景观生态风险指数,开展景观生态风险评价;并结合Slope趋势分析与变异系数构建稳定性矩阵,揭示风险演变及稳定性特征.[结果]1)研究区内景观生态风险以中风险区(约 53%)和较低风险区(约25%)为主,高风险区占比最低,仅约2.5%,主要集聚于塔里木、准噶尔盆地边缘绿洲带.2)20年间,新疆生态风险总体呈稳定向好态势,风险稳定区与风险降低区合计占研究区面积的82.59%,其中风险降低区主要分布于中天山地区,风险稳定区广泛分布于新疆大部分区域.3)新疆景观生态风险变化类型以基本稳定区为主,占全疆面积的70.09%;稳中微升区和波动升高区合计占17.57%,主要分布于山地生态敏感区及环盆地绿洲带,表明局部区域仍存在风险升高和波动性较强的特征.[结论]新疆景观生态风险整体以中低风险为主,其空间分异与波动特征受人类活动强度及生态本底敏感性的共同影响;对于不同的风险变化类型,需制定差异化分区管控对策.

[Objective]This study conducted a long-term assessment of landscape ecological risk and its stability to provide a scientific basis for precise ecological risk prevention and control and for the construction of regional ecological security patterns in arid regions.[Methods]Based on five periods of land-use data from 2000 to 2020,the landscape ecological risk index was calculated to evaluate the regional landscape ecological risk status.A stability matrix was constructed by integrating slope trend analysis with the coefficient of variation to reveal the evolutionary patterns and stability characteristics of ecological risks.[Results]1)Moderate-risk areas accounted for the largest proportion of the study area(approximately 53%),followed by low-risk areas(approximately 25%),whereas high-risk areas accounted for only about 2.5%and were largely confined to the oasis belts along the margins of the Tarim and Junggar Basins.2)Landscape ecological risk exhibited a stable and improving trend during the study period,with stable-risk and decreasing-risk areas jointly accounting for 82.59%of the total area.Areas with decreasing risk were mainly located in the central Tianshan Mountains,whereas stable-risk areas were widespread across most of Xinjiang.3)the stable risk-change type was dominant,covering 70.09%of the total area.Areas characterized by slight but persistent risk increases and fluctuating risk increases together accounted for 17.57%of the region and were mainly located in ecologically sensitive mountainous areas and the oasis belts surrounding the basins,indicating that localized areas remain vulnerable to increasing and unstable ecological risks.[Conclusion]Landscape ecological risk in Xinjiang is generally dominated by moderate and low levels.Its spatial differentiation and fluctuation characteristics are jointly influenced by the intensity of human activities and the sensitivity of the ecological background.Differentiated zonal management and control measures should be formulated for different types of risk change.

马雪莹;杜宏茹;马红莲;赵雪纯;林涛;周耘天

中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011||自然资源部荒漠-绿洲生态监测与修复工程技术创新中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830002||新疆师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011||中国科学院大学,北京 100049中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011||中国科学院大学,北京 100049自然资源部荒漠-绿洲生态监测与修复工程技术创新中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830002中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011||中国科学院大学,北京 100049

天文与地球科学

景观生态风险评价景观格局指数稳定性分析趋势分析变异系数新疆

landscape ecological risk assessmentlandscape pattern indicesstability analysistrend analysiscoefficient of variationXinjiang

《生态环境学报》 2026 (9)

1393-1401,9

第三次新疆综合科学考察"吐哈盆地土地资源承载力与生态农业调查评估"项目(2022xjkk1100)

10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.006

评论