首页|期刊导航|铁道标准设计|基于乘客决策行为的城市轨道交通网络韧性评估

基于乘客决策行为的城市轨道交通网络韧性评估OA

Resilience Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Network Based on Passenger Decision-Making Behavior

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]为保障城市轨道交通网络的安全运营,提升其在突发事件中的应急响应能力和恢复能力.[方法]基于韧性理念,从失效站点影响的客流规模和产生的系统总延误出发,构建网络性能指标,并对网络客流分配方法进行改进,如:引入虚拟换乘边、考虑失效场景下乘客决策行为、生成实时网络,弥补现有研究中对乘客决策行为考虑不足.最后,以北京地铁为例,进行单个站点失效和多个站点在 4 种不同攻击策略下的仿真实验.[结果]结果表明:(1)早高峰时段,北京地铁单个站点失效下网络韧性指标变化呈幂律分布,绝大多数站点失效给网络带来的性能损失量≯5%;(2)造成较大累积性能损失的站点多位于城区与市郊连接的关键区段,其失效导致大量乘客出行中断,最大累积性能损失可达 22.27%;(3)北京地铁网络多站点失效网络性能曲线会先急剧下降,而后趋于平缓,随机攻击下能保持较高网络韧性,网络韧性指标值维持在 0.247 2 左右,相较于度偏好、介数偏好和客流偏好3 种蓄意攻击下韧性指标值分别低43.77%、44.96%和26.41%.[结论]研究成果可为提升城市轨道交通网络安全性和应急响应能力提供理论依据和实践指南.

[Objective]This study aims to ensure the safe operation of urban rail transit networks and enhance their emergency response and recovery capabilities during emergencies.[Methods]Based on the concept of resilience,this study developed network performance indicators from the scale of passenger flow affected by failed stations and the resulting total system delays.It also improved the network passenger flow assignment method by introducing virtual transfer edges,considering passenger decision-making behavior under failure scenarios,and generating real-time networks,thereby addressing the insufficient consideration of passenger decision-making behavior in existing studies.Finally,using Beijing Metro as a case study,simulations of single-station failure and multiple-station failures under four different attack strategies were conducted.[Results]The results indicated that:(1)during the morning peak,the network resilience indicator of Beijing Metro under single-station failure followed a power-law distribution,with the performance loss caused by failures of most stations not exceeding 5%.(2)Stations causing relatively large cumulative performance losses were primarily located in key sections connecting urban areas and suburbs.Their failures caused disruptions to a large number of passenger trips,with the maximum cumulative performance loss reaching 22.27%.(3)Under multiple-station failures in the Beijing Metro network,the network performance curve initially decreased sharply and then gradually leveled off.Under random attacks,the network maintained relatively high resilience,with the resilience indicator remaining around 0.247 2,which was 43.77%,44.96%,and 26.41%lower than those under degree-preference,betweenness-preference,and passenger-flow-preference attacks,respectively.[Conclusion]The findings provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for improving the safety and emergency response capabilities of urban rail transit networks.

王佳;陈翔;林苗朋;张晓

长沙理工大学交通学院,长沙 410114长沙理工大学交通学院,长沙 410114广州港集团有限公司,广州 510100湖南省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司,长沙 410200

交通工程

城市轨道交通网络乘客决策行为韧性评估网络性能指标客流分配

urban rail transit networkpassenger decision-making behaviorresilience evaluationnetwork performance indicatorspassenger flow assignment

《铁道标准设计》 2026 (9)

18-25,68,9

湖南省交通运输厅科技项目(202232,202406)

10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202412300004

评论