首页|期刊导航|现代检验医学杂志|儿童AID与非AID患者血清抗核抗体荧光核型、滴度及特异性抗体检测的诊断价值

儿童AID与非AID患者血清抗核抗体荧光核型、滴度及特异性抗体检测的诊断价值OA

Diagnostic Value of Serum Antinuclear Antibody Fluorescence Patterns,Titers,and Specific Antibodies in Pediatric AID and non-AID Patients

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨儿童抗核抗体(ANA)阳性的临床意义,分析ANA荧光核型、滴度及特异性抗体谱在儿童自身免疫性疾病(AID)与非AID中的诊断价值,筛选儿童AID独立预测因素.方法 回顾性分析2024年7月~2025年6月于西北妇女儿童医院就诊的287例ANA阳性(滴度≥1:100)患儿临床资料,依据最终诊断分为AID组(85例)与非AID组(202例).比较两组ANA荧光核型、滴度及12种特异性抗体分布差异,采用二元Logistic回归分析筛选儿童AID独立预测因素.结果 287例ANA阳性患儿中,AID组占29.62%,非AID组占70.38%.AID组女性占比(71.76%)、年龄中位数[8.00(3.25,10.00)岁]均高于非AID组[53.96%,6.00(2.75,9.00)岁],差异具有统计学意义(χ2=7.854,Z=-2.246,均P<0.05).AID组颗粒型核型占比(49.41%)显著高于非AID组(26.73%),致密细颗粒型占比(8.24%)显著低于非AID组(27.23%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=13.823、12.742,均P<0.001);AID组高滴度(≥1:1000)占比(11.8%)显著高于非AID组(0.50%),非AID组以低滴度(1:100)为主(85.6%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=21.762,P<0.001);AID组特异性抗体总阳性率(45.88%)显著高于非AID组(11.88%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=40.369,P<0.001).Logistic回归分析显示,女性(OR=2.364,P=0.012)、年龄增长(OR=1.095,P=0.019)、抗线粒体M2型(AMA-M2)抗体阳性(OR=5.118,P=0.004)为儿童AID独立危险因素,致密细颗粒型核型(OR=0.326,P=0.025)为独立保护因素.结论 儿童ANA阳性不等同于AID,多为感染等非特异性反应所致;低滴度(1:100)、致密细颗粒型且无特异性抗体提示AID风险低,中高滴度(≥1:320)、颗粒型或均质型、抗dsDNA、抗Sm、抗NUC、抗AMA-M2抗体阳性提示AID风险显著升高.

Objective To explore the clinical significance of antinuclear antibody(ANA)positivity in children,analyze the diag-nostic value of ANA fluorescence patterns,titers,and specific antibody profiles in distinguishing autoimmune diseases(AID)and non-AID in children,and identify independent predictors of AID.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 287 children with ANA positivity(titer≥1:100)who were admitted to the Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital from July 2024 to June 2025.Patients were divided into an AID group(85 cases)and a non-AID group(202 cases)based on the final diagnosis.Differences in ANA fluorescence patterns,titers,and the distribution of 12 specific antibodies were compared be-tween the two groups,and binary Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of AID in children.Re-sults Among the 287 ANA-positive children,29.62%were in the AID group and 70.38%were in the non-AID group.The propor-tion of females(71.76%)and the median age[8.00(3.25,10.00)years]in the AID group were significantly higher than those in the non-AID group[53.96%,6.00(2.75,9.00)years](χ2=7.854,Z=-2.246,both P<0.05).The proportion of granular pattern in the AID group(49.41%)was significantly higher than that in the non-AID group(26.73%),while the proportion of dense fine granular pattern(8.24%)was significantly lower than that in the non-AID group(27.23%)(χ2=13.823 and 12.742,both P<0.001).The proportion of high titer(≥1:1 000)in the AID group(11.8%)was significantly higher than that in the non-AID group(0.50%),whereas the non-AID group was predominantly characterized by low titer(1:100)(85.6%)(χ2=21.762,P<0.001).The overall positive rate of specific antibodies in the AID group(45.88%)was significantly higher than that in the non-AID group(11.88%)(χ2=40.369,P<0.001).Logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender(OR=2.364,P=0.012),increasing age(OR=1.095,P=0.019),and positive anti-mitochondrial M2(AMA-M2)antibody(OR=5.118,P=0.004)were inde-pendent risk factors for AID in children,while dense fine-granular karyotype(OR=0.326,P=0.025)was an independent protec-tive factor.Conclusions Positive ANA in children is not equivalent to AID and is often caused by nonspecific reactions such as infection.Low titer(1:100),dense fine-granular pattern,and absence of specific antibodies indicate a low AID risk,while moder-ate-to-high titers(≥1:320),granular or homogeneous patterns,and positive anti-dsDNA,anti-Sm,anti-NUC,and anti-AMA-M2 antibodies indicate a significantly increased AID risk.

王小倩;刘鹏;谢云;王丽滨

西北妇女儿童医院医学检验中心,西安 710061西北妇女儿童医院医学检验中心,西安 710061西北妇女儿童医院医学检验中心,西安 710061西北妇女儿童医院医学检验中心,西安 710061

医药卫生

儿童抗核抗体自身免疫性疾病荧光核型特异性抗体

childrenantinuclear antibodyautoimmune diseasefluorescence patternspecific antibody

《现代检验医学杂志》 2026 (5)

8-13,25,7

陕西省重点研发计划项目(2023-YBSF-320).

10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2026.05.002

评论