首页|期刊导航|护理研究|基于二维量化分析框架的上海市失能老年人长期照护政策文本研究

基于二维量化分析框架的上海市失能老年人长期照护政策文本研究OA

Textual analysis of long-term care policies for disabled older adults in Shanghai city based on a two-dimensional quantitative analysis framework

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:分析上海市失能老年人长期照护政策的工具使用特征与体系建设重点,为政策优化提供依据.方法:依据Rothwell&Zegveld的政策工具理论,同时结合长期照护服务连续性的特点,构建"政策工具类型-长期照护服务递送流程"二维分析框架;对2014年1月—2024年12月上海市发布的相关政策文本进行逐条编码,提取政策分析单元;采用描述性统计方法,计算各维度的频次与百分比,并通过构建二维交叉表系统呈现政策工具类型与服务递送流程之间的分布关系.结果:共纳入55篇政策文本,提取134个政策分析单元.二维交叉分析显示,政策工具在不同要素间的分布不均.政策工具类型中,环境型工具(38.81%)与供给型工具(34.33%)主导,需求型工具(26.87%)薄弱.服务递送流程中,"服务提供与执行"(35.82%)与"服务规划与内容"(21.64%)占比较高,"需求评估与准入"(9.70%)与"质量监督与评估"(15.67%)环节相对不足.结论:上海市长期照护政策体系已具雏形,但存在工具结构失衡、流程衔接不畅等问题.应优化政策工具组合,强化需求评估与质量监管,以推动体系向精准化、连续化发展.

Objective:To analyze the characteristics of policy instrument usage and the key focuses of system construction in long-term care policies for disabled older adults in Shanghai city,so as to provide a basis for policy optimization.Methods:Based on Rothwell and Zegveld's policy instrument theory and the continuity of long-term care services,a two-dimensional framework(policy instrument types×service delivery processes)was developed.Content analysis was applied to policy documents issued in Shanghai city from January 2014 to December 2024,resulting in coded policy units.The coded data were quantified by using descriptive statistics,with frequencies and percentages calculated for each dimension.Cross-tabulations were constructed to examine the distribution between policy instrument types and service delivery processes.Results:A total of 55 policy texts were included,and 134 policy analysis units were extracted.Two-dimensional cross-analysis revealed an uneven distribution of policy instruments across different elements.Among the types of policy instruments,environmental(38.81%)and supply-type(34.33%)instruments dominated,while demand-type instruments were weak(26.87%).In the service delivery process,"service provision and execution"(35.82%)and"service planning and content"(21.64%)accounted for the higher proportions,while the links of"demand assessment and access"(9.70%)and"quality supervision and evaluation"(15.67%)were relatively underdeveloped.Conclusions:The long-term care policy system in Shanghai city has taken initial shape,but problems such as imbalanced instrument structure and poor process coordination persist.The policy instrument mix should be optimized,and demand assessment and quality supervision should be strengthened to promote the development of the system toward precision and continuity.

刘金龙;张洁;赵博伦;曲婉晨;罗宇;张薇

海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433大连医科大学护理学院海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433

政策工具失能老年人长期照护文本分析

policy instrumentsdisabled older adultslong-term caretextual analysis

《护理研究》 2026 (19)

3372-3378,7

国家自然科学基金项目,编号:72374205

10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.19.004

评论