首页|期刊导航|农业环境科学学报|邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯胁迫下不同水稻品种生理与代谢响应

邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯胁迫下不同水稻品种生理与代谢响应OA

Physiological and metabolic responses of different rice varieties to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate stress

中文摘要英文摘要

为揭示邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)对不同基因型水稻的生理毒性及其代谢调控机制,通过水培试验研究了DEHP胁迫对常规籼稻(NX24)和三系杂交籼稻(TYHZ)幼苗的生理毒性效应,并运用非靶向代谢组学技术解析了其代谢响应特征.结果表明,DEHP胁迫显著抑制了两种水稻的根系生长(最大降幅达36.94%),并对生物量积累表现出抑制效应.DEHP胁迫同时诱导了品种特异性的氧化应激:NX24的过氧化氢含量显著升高43.61%,而TYHZ的丙二醛含量则显著增加36.69%.此外,两品种激活了不同的抗氧化酶系统以抵御氧化损伤:NX24的超氧化物歧化酶活性被显著诱导(增幅达90.06%),而TYHZ的过氧化氢酶活性则显著提升了447.70%.代谢组学分析表明,DEHP胁迫下NX24主要激活了与细胞稳态维持、活性氧清除及能量代谢相关的多个代谢通路,包括鞘脂代谢、植物激素信号转导、类黄酮生物合成及泛酸和CoA生物合成.相比之下,TYHZ则主要通过上调与物理屏障强化(角质、木栓质和蜡质生物合成)和细胞膜结构维持与信号转导(亚油酸代谢)相关的代谢通路来应对胁迫.研究表明,DEHP对水稻幼苗表现出显著生理毒性,且不同基因型水稻的应对策略存在差异,常规稻NX24的响应主要涉及次生代谢网络与激素信号转导的调控,而杂交稻TYHZ则优先强化其物理屏障和膜系统的完整性.

To elucidate the physiological toxicity and underlying metabolic regulatory mechanisms of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(DEHP)in different rice genotypes,hydroponic experiments were conducted to assess the effects of DEHP exposure on seedlings of an inbred indica cultivar(NX24)and a three-line hybrid indica cultivar(TYHZ).Untargeted metabolomics was employed to characterize genotype-specific metabolic response profiles.DEHP exposure markedly inhibited root growth in both genotypes(maximum reduction of 36.94%)and suppressed biomass accumulation.DEHP also induced genotype-specific oxidative stress responses:hydrogen peroxide content increased significantly in NX24(by 43.61%),whereas malondialdehyde levels were significantly elevated in TYHZ(by 36.69%).Distinct antioxidant systems were mobilized to counteract oxidative damage:superoxide dismutase activity in NX24 was strongly induced(an increase of 90.06%),while catalase activity in TYHZ was markedly enhanced(by 447.70%).Metabolomic pathway analysis revealed that under DEHP stress,NX24 primarily activated metabolic routes associated with cellular homeostasis,reactive oxygen species scavenging,and energy metabolism,notably sphingolipid metabolism,plant hormone signal transduction,flavonoid biosynthesis,and pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis.In contrast,TYHZ responded primarily by upregulating pathways implicated in reinforcing physical barriers(cutin,suberin,and wax biosynthesis)and maintaining membrane integrity and signaling(linoleic acid metabolism).Collectively,DEHP exerts substantial phytotoxic effects on rice seedlings,with divergent coping strategies observed between genotypes.NX24 relies predominantly on modulation of secondary metabolism and hormone signaling,whereas TYHZ preferentially enhances its physical barriers and membrane integrity.

陈璘涵;谢宁;王辉;郑飞予;姜美玲;罗斯;杨洋;吴伟健;邓潇

湖南省生态环境监测中心,长沙 410019||生态环境部重金属污染监测重点实验室,长沙 410019湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南省生态环境监测中心,长沙 410019湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128湖南农业大学环境与生态学院,长沙 410128

农业科技

邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯水稻氧化应激代谢响应基因型差异

di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatericeoxidative stressmetabolic responsegenotype differences

《农业环境科学学报》 2026 (8)

1927-1939,13

湖南省自然科学基金项目(2025JJ50193)生态环境部重金属污染监测重点实验室开放基金项目(KLMHM202430) Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province(2025JJ50193)State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Monitoring for Heavy Metal Pollutants(KLMHM202430)

10.11654/jaes.2025-0828

评论