维持性血液透析患者参与血管通路决策体验质性研究的Meta整合OA
Experiences of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis involved in vascular access decision-making:a qualitative Meta-synthesis
目的 系统整合维持性血液透析患者在血管通路决策过程中的体验、困境与需求.方法 系统检索中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、中华医学期刊全文数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus数据库中关于维持性血液透析患者血管通路决策体验的质性研究,检索时限为建库至2025年11月30日.结果 共纳入9篇文献,归纳为9个类别,综合为3个整合结果:血管通路决策的多重困境;血管通路决策的核心考量;血管通路决策支持的关键要素与期待.结论 患者在血管通路决策中面临多重困境,其决策逻辑以生活价值为核心,并高度依赖信任关系与社会支持.临床需建立个体化、动态的沟通与支持模式,尊重患者偏好,以提升决策质量.
Objective To systematically synthesize the experience,challenges,and needs of patients receiving maintenance hemodial-ysis(MHD)during vascular access decision-making process.Methods A systematic search for qualitative studies on experience of MHD patients regarding vascular access decision-making was conducted in databases including China National Knowledge Infrastruc-ture(CNKI),VIP Database,Wanfang Data,China Biomedical Literature Service System,Chinese Medical Journal Full-text Database,PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO,and Scopus,with a retrieval period spanning from database inception to November 30,2025.Results Nine studies were collected.The findings were categorized into nine groups and synthe-sized into three integrated findings:Multiple dilemmas in vascular access decision-making;Core considerations in vascular access de-cision-making;Key elements of and expectations for support in vascular access decision-making.Conclusion Patients face multi-ple challenges in vascular access decision-making.Their decision-making is centered on life value and highly dependent on trust rela-tionship and social support.Clinicians should establish individualized,dynamic communication and support models that respect patient preferences to enhance decision quality.
钱雨萌;俞伟萍;叶雪萍;马锡平
浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 护理部,浙江 杭州 310013浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 护理部,浙江 杭州 310013浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 护理部,浙江 杭州 310013浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 护理部,浙江 杭州 310013
医药卫生
维持性血液透析血管通路决策Meta整合
maintenance hemodialysisvascular accessdecision-makingMeta-integration
《护理学报》 2026 (18)
59-64,6
浙大一院护理科研项目(2025ZYHL12)
评论